Advertisement

Comparative GIS-Based Automated Landform Classifications: Application of Jenness and Shary Methods to the Jebel Chaambi Area (West-Central Tunisia)

  • Meriem Labiadh
  • Ibtissem Amri
  • Mohamed Chedly Rabiaa
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Two landform classifications (Jenness and Shary methods) using spatial statistics and image processing algorithms were performed for the first time in Tunisia. They were applied to the J. Chaambi area (West-central Tunisia). Attempting to highlight geo-morphometric properties of 30 m resolution Digital Elevation Models (DEM), the Jenness classification leads to define ten classes using the ‘Topographical Position Index’ as performed by the module in Arcgis 10.2. The Shary classification is based on a combination of five slope curvature signs producing twelve main landform categories. Plains characterize the main landform type in the first classification; however, convex and concave saddles correspond to the second. The window of perception, in both classification cases, has a major influence on the representation of results. Indeed, the scale effect on classification should be tested by applying both methods to the same area but at different scales.

Keywords

Landform Classification DEM TPI Curvature J. Chaambi 

References

  1. 1.
    Florinsky, I.V.: Digital Terrain Analysis in Soil Science and Geology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iwahashi, J., Pike, R.: Automated classifications of topography from DEMs by an unsupervised nested-means algorithm and a three-part geometric signature. Geomorphology 86(3–4), 409–440 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jenness, J.: Topographic Position Index Extension for ArcView 3.x. Jenness Enterprises (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richard, J.F., Allouch-Khébour, F., Labiadh, M., Morschel, J., Riahi, O., Temple-Boyer, E.: L’eau et le paysage dans la Dorsale Tunisienne. UMR LISAH. IRD Tunis, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rigol-Sanchez, J.P., Stuart, N., Pulido-Bosch, A.: ArcGeomorphometry a toolbox for geomorphometric characterisation of DEMs in the ArcGIS environment. Comput. Geosci. 85, 155–163 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shary, P.A.: Land surface in gravity points classification by a complete system of curvatures. Math. Geol. 27, 373–390 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weiss, A.: Topographic position and landforms analysis. In: Poster Presentation, ESRI Users Conference, vol. 200, San Diego (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, J.P.: Digital terrain modeling. Geomorphology 137(1), 107–121 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meriem Labiadh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ibtissem Amri
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mohamed Chedly Rabiaa
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences of BizerteUniversity of CarthageZarzouna, BizerteTunisia
  2. 2.Research Unit 02UR10-01, Geomatics of GeosystemsCampus UniversitaireManoubaTunisia
  3. 3.Faculty of Arts and Humanities of ManoubaUniversity of ManoubaManoubaTunisia

Personalised recommendations