Advertisement

Estimating Crown Biomass of Oak Trees Using Terrestrial Photogrammetry in Zagros Forests

  • Zahra Azizi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Accurate methods for biomass estimation is necessary for numerous topics related to global warming. Amongst different component of trees, crown biomass is the most difficult to measure. In this study, we tested a simple approach using a hand-held consumer grade camera to estimate the biomass of different components of crown including large and small branches and leaves. Two perpendicular images were taken from 36 Oak trees and the trees were cut down and fresh weight of components was measured in the field. Biomass was calculated for each component by multiplying fresh weight and density of each component. For the estimation of biomass using terrestrial photogrammetric method, pixels of each component were separated and used as predictor in regression equations. Biomass of each component were estimated and bias and RMSE were calculated. Based on the result, this approach provided the most accurate results for medium size trees. In general, the bias and RMSE of total crown biomass estimation were 1.45 and 4.64, respectively. Also, the accuracy of biomass estimation of large branches was the highest while that of leaves biomass was the lowest. However, the density of the stands and the size of trees are two important factors that limit the applicability of this approach.

Keywords

Hand-held camera Oak trees Non-destructive estimation Terrestrial photogrammetry 

References

  1. 1.
    Shahrokhzadeh, U., Sohrabi, H., Copenheaver, C.A.: Aboveground biomass and leaf area equations for three common tree species of Hyrcanian temperate forests in Northern Iran. Botany 93, 663–670 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forsman, M., Börlin, N., Holmgren, J.: Estimation of tree stem attributes using terrestrial photogrammetry with a camera rig. In: XXII ISPRS Congress. Melbourne, 7 Aus, pp. 261–265 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mikita, T., Janata, P., Surovỳ, P.: Forest stand inventory based on combined aerial and terrestrial close-range photogrammetry. Forests 7, 1–14 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Polewski, P., Erickson, A., Yao, W., Coops, N., Krzystek, P., Stilla, U.: Object-based coregistration of terrestrial photogrammetric and Als point clouds in forested areas. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. III-3, 347–354 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, B., Dai, W., Dong, Z., Liu, Y.: Automatic forest mapping at individual tree levels from terrestrial laser scanning point clouds with a hierarchical minimum cut method. Remote Sens. 8, 372 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biskup, B., Scharr, H., Schurr, U., Rascher, U.: A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1299–1308 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liang, X., Jaakkola, A., Wang, Y., Hyyppä, J., Honkavaara, E., Liu, J., Kaartinen, H.: The use of a hand-held camera for individual tree 3D mapping in forest sample plots. Remote Sens. 6, 6587–6603 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Remote Sensing and GISScience and Research Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations