The academic mission (education, research, publication, and patient care) in today’s era of corporate domination is in danger. The problems stem from several issues: (1) cost-effectiveness has become the prime goal for many institutions, reducing clinical spending; (2) hospitals, and especially university hospitals, are costly, mainly because they are high-technology and multidisciplinary enterprises, and reimbursement has declined.
With respect to their teaching mission, the financial constraints and obligations discourage hospitalists from traditional academic pursuits. Moreover, recent reductions in resident training hours and an increasing demand to provide safe and 24-h coverage have altered the traditional role of teachers. Last, working hour restrictions have widened the knowledge gap separating what should be known and what is known and so have intensified the teaching burden on academics.
Teaching and good teachers are costly, and without adequate funding and dedicated faculty time, in or outside the operating room, the quality of the formation of future academics is imperiled.
Lengthy operations and high-tech techniques not only cost more money but take time away from other academic activities. Teaching in the operating room takes more time and costs more. Most countries and faculties are poorly organized with regard to teaching, research, and publishing activities. Solutions have to be found but most likely require a new mind-set for both the academic physicians and the administration. We owe this to our profession and to our patients.
Academic mission Education Research Publication Patient care Budget restrictions Conflicts Teaching
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Zelenock GB, Zambricki CS. The health care crisis. Impact on surgery in the community. Hospital Setting Arch Surg. 2001;136:585–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelenock GB, Stanley JC, More RA, et al. Differential clinical workloads among faculty at a major academic health center. Ann Surg. 1997;226:336–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keswani SG, Moles CM, Morowitz M, Zeh H, Kuo JS, Levine MH, Cheng LS, Hackam DJ, Ahuja N, Goldstein AM, Basic Science Committee of the Society of University Surgeons. The future of basic science in academic surgery: identifying barriers to success for surgeon-scientists. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1053–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko CY, Whang EE, Longmire WP Jr, McFadden DW. Improving the surgeon’s participation in research: is it a problem of training or priority? J Surg Res. 2000;91:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narahari AK, Mehaffey JH, Hawkins RB, Charles EJ, Baderdinni PK, Chandrabhatla AS, Kocan JW, Jones RS, Upchurch GR, Kron IL, Kern JA, Ailawadi G. Surgeon scientists are disproportionately affected by declining NIH funding rates. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:474–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Moy E, Blumenthal D. Status of clinical research in Academic Health Centers views from the research leadership. JAMA. 2001;286:800–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis JPA. Defending biomedical science in an era of threatened funding. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2483–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz IT, Wright AA. Scientific drought, golden eggs, and global leadership—why Trump’s NIH funding cuts would be a disaster. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1701–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar