Advertisement

Representing and Analyzing Enterprise Capabilities as Specialized Actors - A BPM Example

  • Mohammad Hossein Danesh
  • Eric Yu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11158)

Abstract

The notion of capability is used by practitioners and researchers alike to enable better understanding of business trajectories and the role of IT in achieving them. Building on the origins of the concept from strategic management, this paper lays out the requirements for capturing enterprise-specific and social characteristics of capabilities. The paper proposes adoption of a goal-driven agent-oriented modeling approach to satisfy the requirements. The ability of such an approach to explicate social and technical design alternatives and enable decision making on their tradeoffs is illustrated on a BPM capability.

Keywords

Enterprise capability Dynamic capability Agent-oriented modeling i* framework Enterprise modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Stirna, J., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development – an approach to support evolving organizations. In: Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 134, pp. 117–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34549-4_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burton, B.: Eight Business Capability Modeling Best Practices. Gartner (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Business Architecture Guild: A Guide to the Business Architecture Body of Knowledge (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azevedo, C.L.B., Iacob, M.-E., Almeida, J.P.A., van Sinderen, M., Pires, L.F., Guizzardi, G.: Modeling resources and capabilities in enterprise architecture: a well-founded ontology-based proposal for ArchiMate. Inf. Syst. 54, 235–262 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capability and strategic management. Strat. Manag. J. 18, 509–533 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strat. Manag. J. 24, 997–1010 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McKelvie, A., Davidsson, P.: From resource base to dynamic capabilities: an investigation of new firms. Br. J. Manag. 20, S63–S80 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Danesh, M.H., Loucopoulos, P., Yu, E.: Dynamic capabilities for sustainable enterprise IT – a modeling framework. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 358–366. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, E.: Modeling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering (1995). ftp://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/eric/DKBS-TR-94-6.pdf
  11. 11.
    Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Gilbert, B.A.: Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. J. Manag. 37, 1390–1412 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leonard-Barton, D.: Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strat. Manag. J. 13, 111–125 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Helfat, C.E., et al.: Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Collis, D.J.: Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strat. Manag. J. 15, 143–152 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adner, R., Helfat, C.E.: Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strat. Manag. J. 24, 1011–1025 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zollo, M., Winter, S.G.: Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13, 339–351 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross, J.W., Sebastian, I.M., Beath, C.M., Jha, L., Technology Advantage Practice of the Boston Consulting Group: Designing Digital Organizations - Summary of Survey Findings. MIT CISR, Boston, MA (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bosch, J.: Speed, data, and ecosystems: the future of software engineering. IEEE Softw. 33, 82–88 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nevo, S., Wade, M.: The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: antecedents and consequences. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 34, 163–183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Horkoff, J., et al.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study. Requir. Eng. 1–28 (2017). https://rdcu.be/7sH5
  21. 21.
    Danesh, M.H., Yu, E.: Modeling enterprise capabilities with i*: reasoning on alternatives. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNBIP, vol. 178, pp. 112–123. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07869-4_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56509-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Homann, U.: A business-oriented foundation for service orientation. MSDN, Microsoft Corporation (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Danesh, M.H., Yu, E.: Analyzing IT flexibility to enable dynamic capabilities. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNBIP, vol. 215, pp. 53–65. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of InformationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations