Advertisement

Emerging Military Aviation Trends and Potential US Aerospace Adversaries

  • Bert Chapman
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes and analyzes emerging international military aviation, geopolitical, and security trends which could see the F-35’s operational deployment. Particular emphasis is placed on combat scenarios involving China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia and facilities in these countries which could be targeted by the United States and F-35’s from US allied countries. Coverage is also provided of potential combat scenarios involving aerial operations against transnational terrorist organizations across the globe.

References

  1. 2017 Index of U.S. Military Strength. Edited by Dakota Wood (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 2017). http://ims-2017.s3.amazonaws.com/2017_Index_of_Military_Strength_WEB.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  2. Airpower in Afghanistan 2005–2010: The Air Commanders’ Perspectives. Edited by Dag Henriksen (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University Press, 2014). http://www.au.af.mil/au/aupress/digital/pdf/book/b_0000_henriksen_commanders_perspectives.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  3. Allison, Roy. “Russian ‘Deniable” Intervention in Ukraine: How and Why Russia Broke the Rules.” International Affairs, 90 (6) (November 2014): 1255–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Khuzaa’l, Qaa’id K.M. “The Use of Airpower in Combating Terrorism in Iraq.” Air and Space Power Journal, 32 (1) (Spring 2009): 11–18. http://www.airpower.au.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj09/spr09/alkhuzaai.html. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  5. The American Way of Bombing: Changing Ethical and Legal Norms from Flying Fortresses to Drones, edited by Matthew Evangelista and Henry Shue (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
  6. Ballard, William H., Mark C. Harysch, Kevin J. Cole, and Brian S. Hall. “Operationalizing Air-Sea Battle in the Pacific.” Air & Space Power Journal, 29 (1) (January–February 2015): 20–47. http://www.au.af.mil/au/afri/aspj/digital/pdf/articles/2015-Jan-Feb/F-Ballard_Harysch_Cole_Hall.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  7. Beyond the Wall: Chinese Far Sea Operations. Edited by Peter A. Dutton and Ryan A. Martinson (Newport: U.S. Naval War College, China Maritime Studies Institute, 2015). http://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=cmsi-red-books. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  8. Blainey, Geoffrey. The Tyranny of Distance: How Distance Shaped Australia’s History (Melbourne: Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar
  9. Blair, Dave. “Ten Thousand Feet and Ten Thousand Miles: Reconciling Our Air Force Culture to Remotely Piloted Aircraft and the New Nature of Aerial Combat.” Air & Space Power Journal, 26 (3) (May–June 2012): 61–69. http://www.au.af.mil/au/afri/aspj/digital/pdf/articles/2012-May-Jun/V-Blair.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  10. Bowden, Mark. “Predator Drone.” Smithsonian Magazine, 41 (7) (November 2013): 53–56.Google Scholar
  11. Boyle, Michael J. “The Race for Drones.” Orbis, 59 (1) (Winter 2015): 76–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2014.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantwell, Houston R. “Operators of Air Force Unmanned Systems: Breaking Paradigms.” Air & Space Power Journal, 23 (2) (Summer 2009): 67–77. http://www.au.af.mil/au/afri/aspj/digital/pdf/articles/2012-May-Jun/V-Blair.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  13. Chapman, Bert. “Atomic Weapons Program, Soviet.” In Russia At War: From the Mongol Conquest to Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Beyond, edited by Timothy C. Dowling, 69–70 (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2015). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs/91/. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  14. ———. “China’s Nine-Dashed Map: Maritime Source of Geopolitical Tension.” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 8 (1) (2016): 155–157. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs/121/. Accessed February 8, 2017.
  15. Cheung, Tai Ming. “The Chinese Defense Economy’s Long March from Imitation to Innovation.” Journal of Strategic Studies, 34 (3) (June 2011): 325–354.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.574976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. The Chinese Air Force: Evolving Concepts, Roles, and Capabilities. Edited by Richard P. Hallion, Roger Cliff, and Phillip C. Saunders (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 2012). http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/pdf/books/chinese-air-force.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  17. Chubin, Shahram. “Is Iran a Military Threat?” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 56 (2) (2014): 65–88.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00306338.2014.91733.
  18. Cohen, Ariel. Backgrounder: A U.S. Response to Russia’s Military Modernization (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 2014). http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2014/pdf/BG2901.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2017.Google Scholar
  19. “Combat Robot Companies Enter the Table of Organizational Equipment.” OE Watch, 5 (1) (January 2015): 50–52. https://community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/m/oe-watch-past-issues/195464. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  20. Combating Terrorism: Strategies of Ten Countries. Edited by Yonah Alexander (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, Julian. “The Military Dimension of a More Militant Russia.” Russian Journal of Economics, 2 (2016): 143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje/2016.06.002.
  22. Cordesman, Anthony. “The Conventional Military.” In The Iran Primer: Power, Politics, and U.S. Policy, edited by Robin Wright, 66–69 (Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  23. Cordesman, Anthony, Scott Modell, Aaron Lin, and Michael Peacock. Iran’s Rocket and Missile Forces and Strategic Options (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2014). http://csis.org/files/publication/141007_Iran_Rocket_Missile_forces.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  24. Corum, James S., and Wray R. Johnson. Airpower in Small Wars: Fighting Insurgents and Terrorists (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2003).Google Scholar
  25. “Cross-Border Shootout.” Korea Times (October 12, 2014).Google Scholar
  26. Davies, Andrew, and James Mugg. “Submission to Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Inquiry into the Planned Acquisition of the F-35 Lightning II (Joint Strike Fighter).” Australian Strategic Policy Institute (February 19, 2016). https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=47ef7aab=5ff8-43e1-a2ce-9810f29290e3&subid=409407. Accessed August 14, 2018.
  27. Defense Intelligence Agency. “Russia Military Power: Building a Military to Support Great Power Aspirations.” (2017). http://www.dia.mil/Portals/27/Documents/News/Military%20Power%20Publications/Russia%20Military%20Power%20Report%202017.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2018.
  28. Drone Wars: Transforming Conflict, Law, and Policy. Edited by Peter L. Bergen and Daniel Rothenberg (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
  29. Etzioni, Amitai. “Cybersecurity in the Private Sector.” Issues in Science and Technology, 28 (1) (Fall 2011): 59.Google Scholar
  30. ———. “The Great Drone Debate.” Military Review, 93 (2) (March–April 2013): 2.Google Scholar
  31. ———. “The Air-Sea Battle ‘Concept’: A Critique.” International Politics, 51 (5) (2014): 577–596.  https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frear, Thomas. List of Close Military Encounters Between Russia and the West: March 2014–March 2015 (London: European Leadership Network, 2015). http://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/medialibrary/2015/03/11/4264a5a6/ELN Russia - West Full List of Incidents.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  33. Friedberg, Aaron. Beyond Air-Sea Battle: The Debate Over U.S. Military Strategy (London: IISS, 2014).Google Scholar
  34. From Cooperation to Competition: The Future of U.S.-Russian Relations: A Report on an Interdisciplinary War Game (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Press, 2015). http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/download.cfm?q=1283. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  35. Gallup Organization. Gallup Poll (February 2015) [survey question]. USGALLUP.022015.R01. Gallup Organization. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL. Accessed June 22, 2017.Google Scholar
  36. Ganguly, Sumit. “Nuclear Stability in South Asia.” International Security, 33 (2) (Fall 2008): 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Getting Ready for a Nuclear-Ready Iran.” Edited by Henry Sokolski and Patrick Clawson (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2005).Google Scholar
  38. Ghaleb, Alexander. Natural Gas as an Instrument of Russian State Power (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2011).Google Scholar
  39. Gorman, Siobhan, August Cole, and Yochi Dreazen. “Computer Spies Breach Fighter Jet Project.” Wall Street Journal (April 21, 2009): A1.Google Scholar
  40. Gray, Colin S. Air Power for Strategic Effect (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University Press, 2012). http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO?GO56522. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  41. Griffin, Jennifer. “Budget Cuts Impact U.S. Ability to Fight the Enemy, Air Force General Warns.” Fox News (May 26, 2015): 1–4. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/26/budget-cuts-impact-us-ability-to-fight-enemy-air-force-general-warns.html. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  42. Grinter, Lawrence E. Chinese Military Scenarios Against Taiwan: Premises, Options, Implications (Maxwell, AFB, AL: USAF Counterproliferation Center, 2002). http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/grinter.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  43. Gunter, Michael. “Iraq, Syria, ISIS, and the Kurds: Geostrategic Concerns for the U.S. and Turkey.” Middle East Policy, 22 (1) (Spring 2015): 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hammer, Alexander. “Made in China 2025” Attempts to Re-Stimulate Domestic Innovation.” (Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, September 2017): 1–2. http://usitc.gov/publications/332/executive_briefings/ebot_madeinchina2025hammer.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2018.
  45. Harrison, Ross. “Confronting the Islamic State’: Towards a Regional Strategy Contra ISIS.” Parameters, 44 (3) (Autumn 2014): 39–46.Google Scholar
  46. Hassan, Hussein D. “CRS Report for Congress: Iranian Nuclear Sites.” Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress (August 9, 2007). https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc814935/m2/1/high_res_d/RS22531_2007Aug09.pdf. Accessed August 14, 2018.
  47. Herman, Jonathan. “Iran’s Unconventional Counter U.S. Strategy.” M.A. Thesis (Johns Hopkins University, 2014). https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/handle/1774.2/37306/HERMAN-THESIS-2014.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed June 18, 2017.
  48. Hjortdal, Magnus. “China’s Use of Cyber Warfare: Espionage Meets Strategic Deterrence.” Journal of Strategic Security, 4 (2) (Summer 2011): 1–24. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol4/iss2/2/. Accessed June 22, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hsu, Kimberly, Craig Murray, Jeremy Cook, and Amalia Field. China’s Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Industry (Washington, DC: U.S.-China-Economic and Security Review Commission, 2013). http://origin.www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/China%27s Military UAV Industry_14 June 2013.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  50. Hurst, Cindy. “The Militarization of Gazprom.” Military Review, 90 (5) (September–October 2010): 59–67. http://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20101031_art010.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  51. Jae-hwan, Oh. “Security Agencies of North Korea Under the Kim Jong Un Regime.” The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 26 (1) (March 2014): 117–131.Google Scholar
  52. Japan. Ministry of Defense. “Statistics on Scrambles During the First Quarter of FY 2016.” (Tokyo: Ministry of Defense, 2016): 1, 4. http://www.mod.go.jp/js/Press/press2016/press_pdf/p20161014_06.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2018.
  53. “Japan: Russian Incursions Into Airspace Have More Than Doubled in Six Months.” Washington Times (October 21, 2014). https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/oct/21/japan-russian-incursions-into-airspace-have-more-t/. Accessed June 10, 2017.
  54. Kaiser, Henry J. Family Foundation. Kaiser Health Tracking Poll (November 2017). [survey question]. USSSRS111517.KR06E. Cornell University: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL. Accessed December 19, 2017.Google Scholar
  55. Keagle, James M., Richard D. Fisher, Jr., and Brian Johnson. “Enhancing the U.S. Rebalance Toward Asia: Elevating Allies.” Joint Force Quarterly, 70 (3rd Quarter 2013): 59–65. http://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-70/JFQ-70_59-65_Keagle-Fisher-Johnson.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  56. Kearn, Jr. David W. “Air-Sea Battle and China’s Anti-Access and Area Denial Challenge.” Orbis, 58 (1) (Winter 2014): 132–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2013.1106.
  57. Keck, Zachary. “Is Russia’s Lethal PAK-FA Fighter Stealthier Than America’s F-22.” The National Interest (May 26, 2015): 1–2. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-lethal-pak-fa-fighter-stealthier-americas-f-22-12972. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  58. Kennedy, Scott. The Fat Tech Dragon: Benchmarking China’s Innovation Drive (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2017).Google Scholar
  59. Kerr, Paul K., Mary Beth D. Nikitin, and Steven A. Hildreth. “Iran-North Korea-Syria Ballistic Missile and Nuclear Cooperation.” Current Politics and Economics of the Middle East, 5 (1) (2014): 1–16.Google Scholar
  60. Kline, Jeffrey P., and Wayne P. Hughes, Jr. “Between Peace and the Air-Sea Battle: A War at Sea Strategy.” Naval War College Review, 65 (4) (Autumn 2012): 35–40.Google Scholar
  61. Kukreja, Dhiraj. “Air Power: Future Challenges and Emerging Roles.” Air Power Journal, 9 (3) (July–September 2014): 55–78. http://capsindia.org/files/documents/APJ-Jul-Sep-2014-inside.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  62. Majumdfar, Dave. “The Russian Air Force’s Super Weapon: Beware the PAK-FA Stealth Fighter.” The National Interest (November 26, 2014): 1–2. http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-russian-air-forces-super-weapon-beware-the-pak-fa-11742. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  63. Manyin, Mark, Mary Beth Nikitin. Emma Chanlett-Avery, Ian E. Rinehart, and William H. Cooper. U.S.-South Korea Relations (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2013). http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462192/m1/1/high_res_d/R41481_2013Apr26.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  64. “Medals for Drone Pilots.” The Economist, 410 (8880) (March 29, 2014): 33.Google Scholar
  65. Military Balance. (London: International Institute of Strategic Studies, 2016).Google Scholar
  66. Millen, Raymond. “Air-Sea Battle and the Danger of Fostering a Maginot Line Mentality.” Military Review, 95 (2) (March–April 2015): 125–132.Google Scholar
  67. Narang, Vipin. “Nuclear Strategies of Emerging Nuclear Powers: North Korea and Iran.” The Washington Quarterly, 38 (1) (Spring 2015): 73–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2015.1038175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Brian, Kevin A. “Assessing Hostile Reconnaissance and Terrorist Intelligence Activities.” RUSI Journal, 153 (3) (October 2008): 134–139.Google Scholar
  69. O’Rourke, Ronald. China’s Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities-Background and Issues for Congress (Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2017). https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33153.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  70. Oliphant, Roland. “Mapped: Just How Many Incursions into NATO Airspace Has Russian Military Made?” London Daily Telegraph (May 15, 2015). https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/11609783/Mapped-Just-how-many-incursions-into-Nato-airspace-has-Russian-military-made.html. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  71. Ozawa, Jun. China’s ADIZ Over the East China Sea: A “Great Wall in the Sky”? (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2013). http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/12/17-china-air-defense-identification-zone-osawa. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  72. Paust, Jordan J. “Self-Defense Targetings of Non-State Actors and Permissibility of U.S. Use of Drones in Pakistan.” Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 19 (2) (2010): 237–280.Google Scholar
  73. Pelosi, Michael, and Carlo Kopp. “A Preliminary Assessment of Specular Radar Cross Section Performance in the Sukhoi T-50 Prototype.” Air Power Australia Analyses, 9 (2012–03). http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2012-03.html. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  74. Politico/Harvard Public Health Poll. (August 2017) [survey question]. USSSRS.091517PH.R01H. Cornell Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLL. Accessed December 19, 2017.Google Scholar
  75. Raska, Michael. “China’s Defence Aviation Industry: Searching for Innovation-Analysis.” Eurasia Review (October 18, 2012): 1–4. http://www.eurasiareview.com/18102012-chinas-defence-aviation-industry-searching-for-innovation-analysis/. Accessed May 30, 2018.
  76. “Russian Armed Forces UAV Developments in 2014.” OE Watch, 5 (2) (February 2015): 56–57. https://community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/m/oe-watch-past-issues/195463. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  77. Scobell, Andrew, and John M. Sanford. North Korea’s Military Threat: Pyongyang’s Conventional Forces, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and Cruise Missiles (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2007). http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB771.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  78. Sloan, Stephen. International Terrorism: An Action Strategy for Preemption and Punishment. Rev. ed. (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University Press, 2000). http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS204858. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  79. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Made in China 2025 (Beijing: The State Council, 2016): 1–3. http://english.gov.cn/2016special/madeinchina2025/. Accessed May 30, 2018.
  80. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database (Stockholm: SIPRI, 2018). https://www.sipri.org/database/milex. Accessed May 30, 2018.
  81. Sullivan, Conor, Schulyer Standley, and James M. Keagle. “Responding to Russia After the NATO Summit: Unmanned Aerial Systems Overmatch in the Black Sea.” Defense Horizons, 79 (April 2015): 1–8. http://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/defensehorizon/DH-79.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  82. Thaler, David E., Theodore W. Kerasik, et al. Future U.S. Security Relationships with Iraq and Afghanistan (Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, 2008). https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG681.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  83. Tichỳa, Lukáš. “Security and Foreign Policy of Dmitry Medvedev in the Period 2008–2012.” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 27 (4) (2014): 533–552.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2014.963398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. U.S. Air Force. Factsheet: MQ-1B Predator (Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force, 2010a): 1–2. http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets/Display/tabid/224/Article/104469/mq-1b-predator.aspx. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  85. ———. Factsheet: MQ-9 Reaper (Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force, 2010b): 1–2. http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets/Display/tabid/224/Article/104470/mq-9-reaper.aspx. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  86. ———. Factsheet: RQ-4 Global Hawk (Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force, 2014): 1–2. http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets/Display/tabid/224/Article/104516/rq-4-global-hawk.aspx. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  87. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. 2009 Report to Congress (Washington, DC: GPO, 2009). https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/annual_reports/2009-Report-to-Congress.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  88. U.S. Congress. House Committee on Armed Services. Addressing the Iranian Nuclear Challenge: Understanding the Military Options (Washington, DC: GPO, 2012). http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo32363. Accessed May 18, 2017.
  89. ———. P5+1 Negotiations Over Iran’s Nuclear Program and Its Implications for United States Defense (Washington, DC: GPO, 2015a. http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo54839. Accessed June 18, 2017.
  90. ———. Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces. Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) Requirements Assessment (Washington, DC: GPO, 2015b). http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo56620. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  91. ———. The State of the Military (Washington, DC: GPO, 2017): 75–80. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115hhrg24676/pdf/CHRG-115hhrg24676.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  92. U.S. Defense Science Board. The Role of Autonomy in DOD Systems (Washington, DC: Defense Science Board, 2012). https://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2010s/AutonomyReport.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  93. U.S. Department of Defense. Air-Sea Battle Office. Air Sea-Battle: Service Collaboration to Address Anti-Access and Area Denial Challenges (Washington, DC: DOD Air-Sea Battle Office, 2013a). http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/ASB-ConceptImplementation-Summary-May-2013.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  94. ———. Military and Security Developments Involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: Report to Congress (Washington, DC: DOD, 2013b). https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/Report_to_Congress_on_Military_and_Security_Developments_Involving_the_DPRK.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  95. ———. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2015 (Washington, DC: DOD, 2015a). http://www.defense.gov/pubs/2015_China_Military_Power_Report.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  96. ———. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea: Report to Congress (Washington, DC: DOD, 2015b). https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/Military_and_Security_Developments_Involving_the_Democratic_Peoples_Republic_of_Korea_2015.PDF. Accessed February 9, 2017.
  97. ———. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2016 (Washington, DC: DOD, 2016).Google Scholar
  98. ———. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2017 (Washington, DC: DOD, 2017a).Google Scholar
  99. ———. Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller/Chief Financial Officer). Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System. (Washington, DC: DOD, 2017b): 12. http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2014/FY2014_Weapons.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  100. U.S. Department of State. Counterterrorism. Bureau. Country Reports on Terrorism 2013 (Washington, DC: Department of State, 2014a). http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/225886.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2017.
  101. ———. International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2014 (Washington, DC: Department of State, 2014b). https://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2014/. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  102. ———. Trafficking in Persons Report 2014. (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, 2014c). http://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2014/. Accessed June 16, 2017.
  103. ———. Counterterrorism Bureau. Country Reports on Terrorism 2014 (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, 2015). http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/239631.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2017.
  104. U.S. Government Accountability Office. Defense Acquisitions: Assessments of Selected Weapons Programs (Washington, DC: GAO, 2013): 101. http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/653379.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  105. U.S. National Air and Space Intelligence Center. Ballistic & Cruise Missile Threat 2017 (Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: NASIC, 2017). http://www.nasic.af.mil/Portals/19/images/Fact%20Sheet%20Images/2017%20Ballistic%20and%20Cruise%20Missile%20Threat_Final_small.pdf?ver=2017-07-21-083234-343. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  106. U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence. Iranian Naval Forces: A Tale of Two Navies (Washington, DC: Office of Naval Intelligence, 2017). http://purl.gdlp.gov/GPO/gpo85530. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  107. “U.S. Says Russia Adds Air Defense Systems Inside Ukraine.” VOA News (April 22, 2015). https://www.voanews.com/a/reu-us-says-russia-adds-air-defense-systems-inside-ukraine/2731074.html. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  108. United Nations. Division for Ocean Affairs and Law of the Sea. Submission by China (New York: United Nations Commission on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), May 7, 2009): 1–2. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mysvnm33_09/chn_2009re_mys_vnm_e.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  109. Van Tol, Jan, Mark Gunzinger, Andrew Krepinevich, and Jim Thomas. AirSea Battle: A Point of Departure Operational Concept (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2010). https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/airsea-battle-concept/. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  110. Wall, Tyler, and Torin Monahan. “Surveillance and Violence from Afar: The Politics of Drones and Liminal Security-Scapes.” Theoretical Criminology, 15 (3) (2011): 239–254.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480610396650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ward, Stephen R. Immortal: A Military History of Iran and Its Armed Forces (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
  112. Weitz, Richard. Parsing Chinese-Russian Military Exercises (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Press, 2015). http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/download.cfm?q=1266. Accessed June 19, 2017.
  113. Wilgenbusch, Ronald, and Alan Heisig. “Command and Control Vulnerabilities to Communications Jamming.” Joint Force Quarterly, 69 (2nd Quarter 2013): 56–63. http://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-69/JFQ-69_56-63_Wilgenbusch-Heisig.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2017.
  114. Wyss, Marco. “Clashing Over Fighters: Winners and Losers.” CSS Analysis in Security Policy, 92 (2011): 1–3. http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:2957/eth-2957-01.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2017.
  115. Yung, Christopher D. “Sinica Rules the Waves?: The People’s Liberation Army Navy’s Power Projection and Anti-Access/Aerial Denial Lessons from the Falklands/Malvinas Conflict.” In Chinese Lessons from Other People’s Wars, edited by Andrew Scobell, David Lai, and Roy Kamphausen, 75–114 (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2011). http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/download.cfm?q=1090. Accessed June 17, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bert Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations