Advertisement

Making Manifestos in Absentia: Of a World Without Curriculum Theory

  • Molly QuinnEmail author
  • Niki Christodoulou
Chapter

Abstract

What if we lived in a world where there was no curriculum theory, where curriculum theory had never been nor would be, or of curriculum theory at its end? As we come together to consider both the current tasks of curriculum theorists, and those possibly to come, and the compelling makings of manifesto matters therein, we begin to ponder these questions. Here, we take them up: the vital presence or movement of curriculum theory, perhaps, felt and perceived most keenly in imagining and contemplating its absence. Yet we seek, in undertaking this endeavor, to promote and perform in some way, too, the import of living interpretation, and community. In proposing, thus, to think through, beside, against and with one another about such absence, and its implications for our loyalties and labors in curriculum, we do so from our own autobiographical grounds, and in relation to historical roots in the field that have nurtured and sustained us, and also regarding the work as an affirmative and transformative human project. Specifically, writ large we proceed in examining a world without curriculum theory through a vital thrust of the field: theory itself.

References

  1. Aoki, T. T. (2004). Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, A. (2010). And they’ll say it’s a movement. In E. Malewski (Ed.), A curriculum handbook: The next moment (pp. 523–527). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Britzman, D. P. (2000). If the story cannot end: Deferred action, ambivalence, and difficult knowledge. In S. Rosenberg & C. Eppert Rog (Eds.), Between hope and despair: Pedagogy and the remembrance of historical trauma. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Casemore, B. (2008). The autobiographical demand of place: Curriculum inquiry in the American South (Vol. 21). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, C. (1999). A topography for Canadian curriculum theory. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 24, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chodorow, N. J. (1999). The power of feelings: Personal meaning in psychoanalysis, gender, and culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Christodoulou, N. (2012). A place full of wisdom and inspiration. In R. L. S. Harper (Ed.), 3010: Presented to William H. Schubert. Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Christodoulou, N. (2014). Oral history and living memory in Cyprus: Performance and curricular considerations. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 30–43. http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/tci.
  10. Christodoulou, N. (2015). Contested language, memory, and oral history as curriculum questions: A tale from Cyprus. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2(2), 324–345. http://pages.ie.uminho.pt/ejcs/index.php/ejcs/article/view/95.
  11. Connelly, F. M., He, M. F., & Phillion, J. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1964a). Human nature and conduct. In R. Archambault (Ed.), John Dewey on education (pp. 61–69). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (original work published 1922).Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1964b). What is freedom? In R. Archambault (Ed.), John Dewey on education (pp. 81–88). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (original work published 1922).Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  15. Doll, W. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Doll, W. (2012). Pragmatism, post-modernism, and complexity theory: The “fascinating imaginative realm” of William E. Doll, Jr. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Continuum International Publishing Group (original work published 1975).Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, D. (2008). Curriculum and the idea of a cosmopolitan inheritance. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2010). The grand design. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row (original work published 1954).Google Scholar
  21. Huebner, D. E. (1999). The lure of the transcendent: Collected essays by Dwayne E. Huebner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Ibrahim, A. (2005). The question of the question is the foreigner: Towards an economy of hospitality. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 4(21), 149–162.Google Scholar
  23. Ladd, E. T., & Brubacher, J. S. (1956, July 2). Philosophical foundations of the curriculum: A report prepared at the request of the Secretariat of Unesco. Paris: International Advisory Committee on the School Curriculum, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).Google Scholar
  24. Lear, J. (2006). Radical hope: Ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. MacDonald, J. (1995). Theory as a prayerful act: The collected essays of James B. MacDonald. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Malewski, E. (2010a). A way of knowing in the future of curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 534–539). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Malewski, E. (2010b). Introduction: Proliferating curriculum. In E. Malewski (Ed.), A curriculum handbook: The next moment (pp. 1–39). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, J. (1990). Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, J. (2005a). Sounds of silence breaking: Women, autobiography, curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, J. (2005b). The American curriculum field and its worldly encounters. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 21(2), 9–24.Google Scholar
  31. Pacheco, J. A. (2012). Curriculum studies: What is the field today? Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 8, 1–25.Google Scholar
  32. Pinar, W. F. (2009). The worldliness of a cosmopolitan education: Passionate lives in public service. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Pinar, W. F. (2010). The next moment. In E. Malewski (Ed.), A curriculum handbook: The next moment (pp. 528–533). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Pinar, W. F. (2012a). Introduction. In D. Trueit (Ed.), Pragmatism, post-modernism and complexity theory: The “fascinating imaginative realm” of William E. Doll, Jr. (pp. 1–10). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Pinar, W. F. (2012b). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (original published 2004, 1st ed.).Google Scholar
  36. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  37. Pinar, W., & Kincheloe, J. (1991). Curriculum as social psychoanalysis: The significance of place. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  38. Quinn, M. (2001). Going out, not knowing whither: Education, the upward journey and the faith of reason. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  39. Quinn, M. (2010). ‘No room in the inn’? The question of hospitality in the post(partum)-labors of curriculum studies. In E. Malewski (Ed.), A curriculum handbook: The next moment (pp. 101–117). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Robinson, K., Sir. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. West Sussex, UK: Capstone Publishing (original work published 2001).Google Scholar
  41. Saint-Exupéry, A. de. (1950). The wisdom of the sands (S. Gilbert, Trans.). New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company (English translation of the French Citadelle).Google Scholar
  42. Saint-Exupéry, A. de. (2015). The little prince (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (original work published 1941).Google Scholar
  43. Scanlon, L. (2009). All the world. New York: Beach Lane Books.Google Scholar
  44. Schubert, W. H. (1996). Perspectives on four curriculum traditions. Educational Horizons, 74, 169–176.Google Scholar
  45. Schubert, W. H., & Ayers, W. C. (1991). Teacher lore: Learning from our own experience. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  46. Schubert, W. H., Lopez-Schubert, A. L., Thomas, T. P., & Carroll, W. M. (2002). Curriculum books: The first hundred years (2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  47. Slattery, P. (2006). Curriculum development in the postmodern era: Teaching and learning in an age of accountability (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taubman, P. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., & Rife, A. (2005). Dialogic inquiry in an urban second-grade classroom: How intertextuality shapes and is shaped by social interactions and scientific understandings. In R. Yerrick & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  51. Walker, D. (1990). Fundamentals of curriculum. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  52. Watkins, W. (1993). Black curriculum orientations: A preliminary inquiry. Harvard Educational Review, 63(3), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Augusta UniversityAugustaUSA
  2. 2.StrovolosCyprus

Personalised recommendations