Advertisement

Jose Rizal pp 71-77 | Cite as

Conclusion: Resurrecting Plants

  • Lisandro E. Claudio
Chapter
Part of the Global Political Thinkers book series (GPT)

Abstract

This conclusion asks what Rizal’s vision of liberalism means for postcolonies and the Global South today. It critiques the tendency among postcolonial scholars to treat liberalism as the “Other” of their radical project from the margins. Their writings fail to acknowledge the contributions of postcolonial liberals like Rizal in forming independent political communities. Finally, it contends that a renewed liberalism is necessary amid the rise of global populism and illiberal democracy.

Keywords

Postcolonial theory Liberalism Global South Populism Illiberal democracy Duterte 

Bibliography

  1. Bruckner, Pascal. 2010. The Tyranny of Guilt: An Essay on Western Masochism. Trans. Steven Rendall. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Claudio, Lisandro E. 2017. Defending Liberalism in the Global South: Notes from Duterte’s Philippines. The Global South 11 (2): 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. 2001. Millenial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a Second Coming. In Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism, ed. Jean Comaroff and John L. Comaroff, 1–56. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curato, Nicole. 2015. Deliberative Capacity as an Indicator of Democratic Quality: The Case of the Philippines. International Political Science Review 36 (1): 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Furet, Francois. 2000. The Passing of an Illusion: The Idea of Communism in the Twentieth Century. Trans. Deborah Furet. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Go, Julian. 2017. Myths of Nation and Empire: The Logic of America’s Liberal Empire-State. Thesis 11 139 (1): 69–83.Google Scholar
  7. Hollander, Paul. 2016. From Benito Mussolini to Hugo Chavez: Intellectuals and a Century of Political Hero Worship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holmes, Oliver. 2016. Duterte Says Children Killed in Philippines Drug War Are ‘Collateral Damage.’ The Guardian, October 17. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/17/duterte-says-children-killed-in-philippines-drug-war-are-collateral-damage
  9. Judt, Tony. 2010. Ill Fares the Land. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mehta, Uday Singh. 1999. Liberalism and Empire. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Pulse Asia Research Inc. 2017. September 2017 Nationwide Survey on the Campaign Against Illegal Drugs. http://www.pulseasia.ph/september-2017-nationwide-survey-on-the-campaign-against-illegal-drugs/
  12. Quimpo, Nathan Gilbert. 2008. Contested Democracy and the Left in the Philippines After Marcos. Governance and Political Change. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Táíwò, Olúfẹmi. 2014. Africa Must Be Modern: A Manifesto. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Thompson, Mark R. 1996. Off the Endangered List: Philippine Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics 28 (2): 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisandro E. Claudio
    • 1
  1. 1.De La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations