Advertisement

On Extended Guttman Condition in High Dimensional Factor Analysis

  • Kentaro HayashiEmail author
  • Ke-Hai Yuan
  • Ge (Gabriella) Jiang
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 265)

Abstract

It is well-known that factor analysis and principal component analysis often yield similar estimated loading matrices. Guttman (Psychometrika 21:273–285, 1956) identified a condition under which the two matrices are close to each other at the population level. We discuss the matrix version of the Guttman condition for closeness between the two methods. It can be considered as an extension of the original Guttman condition in the sense that the matrix version involves not only the diagonal elements but also the off-diagonal elements of the inverse matrices of variance-covariances and unique variances. We also discuss some implications of the extended Guttman condition, including how to obtain approximate estimates of the inverse of covariance matrix under high dimensions.

Keywords

High dimensions Principal components Unique variances 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. Dylan Molenaar’s comments. Ke-Hai Yuan’s work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-1461355.

References

  1. Anderson, T. W. (2003). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M. (1976). Multistructure statistical model applied to factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 11, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guttman, L. (1956). Best possible systematic estimates of communalities. Psychometrika, 21, 273–285.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harville, D. A. (1997). Matrix algebra from a statistician’s perspective. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayashi, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). On the relations among regular, equal unique variances and image factor analysis. Psychometrika, 65, 59–72.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayashi, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). The asymptotic covariance matrix of maximum-likelihood estimates in factor analysis: The case of nearly singular matrix of estimates of unique variances. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 321, 153–173.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krijnen, W. P. (2006). Convergence of estimates of unique variances in factor analysis, based on the inverse sample covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 71, 193–199.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971). Factor analysis as a statistical method (2nd ed.). New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  9. Pourahmadi, M. (2013). High-dimensional covariance estimation. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schneeweiss, H. (1997). Factors and principal components in the near spherical case. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schneeweiss, H., & Mathes, H. (1995). Factor analysis and principal components. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 55, 105–124.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M. (1999). Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 61, 611–622.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Warton, D. I. (2008). Penalized normal likelihood and ridge regularization of correlation and covariance matrices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 340–349.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2008). Structural equation modeling with near singular covariance matrices. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 4842–4858.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yuan, K.-H., & Chan, W. (2016). Structural equation modeling with unknown population distributions: Ridge generalized least squares. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 163–179.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kentaro Hayashi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ke-Hai Yuan
    • 2
  • Ge (Gabriella) Jiang
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  3. 3.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana-ChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations