Advertisement

Introduction

  • Christian MaroyEmail author
  • Xavier Pons
Chapter
Part of the Educational Governance Research book series (EGTU, volume 11)

Abstract

This book provides a multilevel and comparative analysis of the effective implementation of performance-based accountability policies in French and Quebec education. Generally speaking, these policies can be defined as sets of objectives, measures, organizational processes, and tools whose goal is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of education systems through the introduction of mechanisms encouraging or forcing actors to aim for measurable objectives or targets and to be answerable for their actions and performances. Studied as such in this volume, these policies are also very rewarding empirical subjects for researchers aiming to investigate broader issues such as the implementation of New Public Management in education, state reforms and the globalization of education governance, since these policies are probably indicative of more general changes in public governance.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrère, A. (2006). Sociologie des chefs d’établissement. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  6. Bezes, P. (2005). Le renouveau du contrôle des bureaucraties. Informations sociales, 6, 26–37.Google Scholar
  7. Broadfoot, P. (2000). Un nouveau mode de régulation dans un système décentralisé: l’État évaluateur. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 130, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buisson-Fenet, H., & Pons, X. (2014). School evaluation policies and educating states: Trends in four European countries. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  9. Carney, S. (2012). Imagining globalisation: Educational policyscapes. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 339–353). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale, R., & Robertson, S. L. (2002). The varying effects of regional organizations as subjects of globalization of education. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demailly, L. (2001). Evaluer les politiques éducatives: sens, enjeux, pratiques. In L. Demailly (Ed.), Enjeux de l’évaluation et régulation des systèmes scolaires. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  13. Demailly, L. (2003). L’évaluation comme apprentissage et négociation. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 142, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demailly, L., & collègues. (1998). Evaluer les établissements scolaires: enjeux, expériences, débats. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  15. Desrosières, A. (1993). La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  16. Dupriez, V., & Mons, N. (2011). Introduction. Les politiques d’accountability. Du changement institutionnel aux transformations locales. Éducation Comparée, 5, 7–16.Google Scholar
  17. Easley, J., II, & Tulowitzki, P. (Eds.). (2016). Educational accountability. International perspectives on challenges and possibilities for school leadership. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Education Comparée. (2011). Les politiques d’accountability. Du Changement Institutionnel aux Transformations Locales, 5, 1–240.Google Scholar
  19. Education Comparée. (2014). Le développement des politiques d’accountability et leur instrumentation dans le domaine de l’éducation. (11), 1–265.Google Scholar
  20. Gunter, H. M., Grimaldi, E., Hall, D., & Serpieri, R. (Eds.). (2016). New public management and the reform of education. Londres: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Halpern, C., Hassenteufel, P., & Zittoun, P. (2018). Policy analysis in France. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297–327.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3326211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, D. N., & Herrington, C. D. (2006). Accountability, standards, and the growing achievement gap: Lessons from the past half-century. American Journal of Education, 112(2), 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hood, C. (1986). The tools of government. Chatham, UK: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  25. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hood, C. (1996). Exploring variations in public management reform of the 1980s. H. A. G. Hans, M. Bekke, J. L. Perry, T. A. Toonen, Civil service systems in comparative perspective 268–287). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., & Varone, F. (2006). Analyse et pilotage des politiques publiques. Zurich, Switzerland: Verslag Rüegger.Google Scholar
  28. Kogan, M. (1988). Education accountability: An analytic overview. London/Dover, NH: USA Hutchinson Education.Google Scholar
  29. Lascoumes, P. (1996). Rendre gouvernable: de la “traduction” au “transcodage”. L’analyse des processus de changement dans les réseaux d’action publique. In CURAPP (Ed.), La gouvernabilité (pp. 325–338). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  30. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2004). Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de la fondation nationale des sciences politiques.Google Scholar
  31. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Sociologie de l’action publique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, J. (2006). Input-guarantee versus performance-guarantee approaches to school accountability: Cross-state comparisons of policies, resources, and outcomes. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(4), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, J. (2008). Is test driven external accountability effective synthesizing the evidence from cross state causal comparative and correlational studies. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 608–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leithwood, K., & Earl, L. (2000). Educational accountability effects: An international perspective. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lessard, C., & Carpentier, A. (2015). Politiques éducatives: la mise en oeuvre. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  36. Lessard, C., & Meirieu, P. (2008). L’obligation de résultats en éducation: évolutions, perspectives et enjeux internationaux. Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck Supérieur.Google Scholar
  37. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lingard, B. (2006). Globalisation, the research imagination and deparochialising the study of education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.820042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New scalar politics: Implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489–502.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.555941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Malen, B. (2006). Revisiting policy implementation as a political phenomenon. In New directions in education policy implementation (pp. 83–105). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  43. Maroy, C., Pons, X., & Dupuy, C. (2017). Vernacular globalisations: Neo-statist accountability policies in France and Quebec education. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 100–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1239841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maroy, C., & Voisin, A. (2014). Une typologie des politiques d’accountability en éducation: l’incidence de l’instrumentation et des théories de la régulation. Education Compare, 11, 31–58.Google Scholar
  45. Mattei, P. (2009). Restructuring welfare organizations in Europe: From democracy to good management? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mattei, P. (2012). Market accountability in schools: Policy reforms in England, Germany, France and Italy. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 247–266.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.689694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mattei, P., Mitra, M., Vrangbæk, K., Neby, S., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2013). La réorganisation de l’imputabilité publique: les réformes hospitalières en Allemagne, en Norvège et au Danemark. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives, 79(2), 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neave, G. (1988). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: An overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986–1988. European Journal of Education, 23(1–2), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Normand, R. (2011). Gouverner la Réussite Scolaire: Une Arithmétique Politique des Inégalités. Lyon, France/Berne, Switzerland: ENSL, Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Normand, R., & Derouet, J.-L. (2009). Quelles politiques pour l’égalité ? Savoirs, gouvernances et obligation de résultats. Réflexions croisées anglo-américaines. Lyon, France: INRP.Google Scholar
  51. Ozga, J., Dahler-Larsen, P., Segerholm, C., & Simola, H. (2011). Fabricating quality in education: Data and governance in Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ozga, J., & Jones, R. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: The case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pierson, P. (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093032000124848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of governance. A guide to the new governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Segerholm, C. (2012). The quality turn: Political and methodological challenges in contemporary educational evaluation and assessment. Education Inquiry, 3(2), 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, A. (1999). Public policy analysis in contemporary France: Academic approaches, questions and debates. Public Administration, 77(1), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spillane, J., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Voisin, A. (2017). Systèmes d’accountability basés sur la performance: types, logiques instrumentales et effets sur l’efficacité et l’équité des systèmes éducatifs d’Europe et du Canada. Une étude comparative à partir des données PISA 2012. PhD Thesis, Université de Montréal, Montréal.Google Scholar
  63. Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wößmann, L. (2007). International evidence on school competition, autonomy, and accountability: A review. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(2–3), 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.University of Eastern-Paris CreteilParisFrance

Personalised recommendations