Advertisement

Difference and Robustness: An Aristotelian Approach

  • Alfredo Marcos
Chapter
Part of the History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences book series (HPTL, volume 23)

Abstract

The paper starts by recalling the ordinary and etymological sense of the word “robustness”, for placing it then in the context of the current systemic view. Then I focus discussion on systems robustness in the paradigmatic case of living organisms. We discover that the notion of robustness is closely linked, in the case of organism, with the notion of difference, given that organisms arise precisely by a differentiation process (Sect. 13.1). So, in order to understand the ontology of robustness, we need to explore the ontology of difference; and in order to do so, we must distinguish between constitutive and comparative difference (Sect. 13.2.1). Then I deal with the problem of unity of the constitutive differences: I wonder if it is possible to unify the many differences that an organism exhibits in a single difference. It is an important question, given that unity is one of most essential characteristics of the organism (Sect. 13.2.2). And the answer to this question raises immediately a query for the intelligibility of this final and unique constitutive difference (Sect. 13.2.3). Such intellibility is possible thanks to the formal nature of the final difference, but it requires also a pluralistic approach. Besides that, we have to sketch the ontological and epistemological relationships between difference, identity and similarity (Sect. 13.3), which will be crucial for intelligibility of the difference, since according to a certain tradition, intelligibility depends on identity.

Keywords

Robustness Constitutive difference Comparative difference Identity Similarity 

References

  1. Amundson, R. (2005). The changing rule of the embryo in evolutionary biology: Structure and synthesis. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle. Metaphysics.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. On the Generation of Animals.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. On the Parts of Animals.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. On the Soul.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle. Physics.Google Scholar
  7. Aristotle. Sophistical Refutations.Google Scholar
  8. Balme, D. (1987a). Aristotle’s use of divisio and differentiae. In A. Gotthelf & J. Lennox (Eds.), Philosophical issues in Aristotle’s biology (pp. 69–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balme, D. (1987b). Aristotle’s biology was not essentialist. In A. Gotthelf & J. Lennox (Eds.), Philosophical issues in Aristotle’s biology (pp. 291–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. París: P.U.F..Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (1967). L’Écriture et la différence. París: Seuil.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. (2002). Identity and Difference (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Inciarte, F. (1974). El reto del positivismo lógico. Madrid: Rialp.Google Scholar
  14. Lennox, J. (2017). An Aristotelian philosophy of biology: Form, Function and Development. In M. Bertolaso (Ed.), Emerging trends in the philosophy of biology. Acta Philosophica (Vol 26, pp. 33–52).Google Scholar
  15. Lyotard, J. F. (1983). Le différend. París: Minuit.Google Scholar
  16. Marcos, A. (1996). Aristóteles y otros animales. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
  17. Marcos, A. (2012). Postmodern Aristotle. Newcastle: CSP.Google Scholar
  18. Mitchell, S. (2004). Why integrative pluralism? E:CO Special Double Issue, 6(1–2), 81.Google Scholar
  19. Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos. Why the materialist Neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholson, D. J. (2014). The return of the organism as a fundamental explanatory concept in biology. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pellegrin, P. (1982). La classification des animaux chez Aristote. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  22. Scaltsas, T. (1994). Substances & Universals in Aristotle’s metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Zubiri, X. (1980). La inteligencia sentiente [Sentient Intelligence]. Madrid, Alianza. English translation from http://www.zubiri.org/works/englishworks/si/SI1C1.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ValladolidValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations