Advertisement

Designing a Performance Measurement System

  • Fiorenzo Franceschini
  • Maurizio Galetto
  • Domenico Maisano
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

The present chapter discusses a core problem of quality management for organizations: establishing and maintaining a performance measurement system. Flowing from the mission and strategic planning of one organization, a performance measurement system is supposed to include the data to collect, analyze, report and, finally, use to make sound business decisions.

The remainder of this chapter is divided into eight sections. Sections 5.1 and 5.2 present the basic characteristics of an integrated performance measurement system. Section 5.3 discusses some popular approaches to develop performance measurement systems: the Balanced Scorecard , the Critical Few , the Performance Dashboards, and the EFQM model. Description is supported by the use of practical examples. Sections 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6 discuss how to develop/synthesise indicators and maintain an effective performance measurement system. Sections 5.7 and 5.8 deal with the possible misuse of indicators and their impact on organizations.

References

  1. AECD. (1997). Rewarding progress towards goals: Highlights of Alberta’s performance envelope funding. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.Google Scholar
  2. AECD. (1999). 1998/99 Annual Report. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.Google Scholar
  3. Akao, V. (1988). Quality function deployment. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  4. APQI (Associazione Premio Qualità Italia). (2018). Migliorare le organizzazioni pubbliche attraverso l’autovalutazione. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.apqi.it/media/1128/caf_2013_italiano.pdf.
  5. Atkinson, A. (1997). Linking performance measurement to strategy. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, 1(4), 5.Google Scholar
  6. Auditor General of Canada and the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. (2017). Developing performance measures for sustainable development strategies. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/meth_gde_e_23715.html.
  7. Barnetson, B., & Cutright, M. (2000). Performance indicators as conceptual technologies. Higher Education, 40, 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourne, M. C., & Bourne, P. (2011). Handbook of corporate performance management. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, M. G. (1996). Keeping score: Using the right metrics to drive world-class performance. New York: Quality Resources, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  10. DISPEA. (2004–2005). Dipartimento di Sistemi di produzione ed economia dell’Azienda, Project: “Il nuovo Call Center del Comune di Torino: monitoraggio della qualità della comunicazione offerta ai cittadini” (in alliance with AICQ and Comune di Torino).Google Scholar
  11. DISPEA. (2005). Dipartimento di Sistemi di produzione ed economia dell’Azienda, Project: “Valutazione della qualità nei servizi SO (Service Operations)” (in alliance with RAI).Google Scholar
  12. Eccles, R. (1991). The performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 131–137.Google Scholar
  13. EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management). (2013). Retrieved September 2018, from www.efqm.org.
  14. Flapper, S. D. P., Fortuin, L., & Stoop, P. P. M. (1996). Toward consistent performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(7), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franceschini, F. (2001). Dai Prodotti ai Servizi. Le nuove frontiere per la misura della qualità. Torino: UTET Libreria.Google Scholar
  16. Franceschini, F. (2002). Advanced quality function deployment. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press/CRC Press LLC.Google Scholar
  17. Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2005). A short survey on air quality indicators: Properties, use, and (mis)use. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 16(5), 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2007). Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurement systems. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  19. Franceschini, F., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2018). Service gap deployment: A framework to link quality gaps to service activities. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 29(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franceschini, F., & Romano, D. (1999). Control chart for linguistic variables: A method based on the use of linguistic quantifiers. International Journal of Production Research, 37(16), 3791–3801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauser, J., & Katz, G. (1998). Metrics: You are what you measure! European Management Journal, 16(5), 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houghton College. (2004). Dashboard indicators: The top mission-critical indicators for Houghton College. Retrieved September 2018, from http://campus.houghton.edu/.
  23. Juran, J. M. (2016). Quality control handbook (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71–79.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The execution premium. Linking strategy to operations for competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  26. Kells, H. (1992). Self-regulation in higher education: A multinational perspective on collaborative systems of quality assurance and control. London: Jessica-Kingsley.Google Scholar
  27. Lohman, C., Fortuin, L., & Wouters, M. (2004). Designing a performance measurement system: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mintzberg, H. (1996). Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 75–83.Google Scholar
  30. Neely, A. (Ed.). (2002). Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Neely, A., Richards, H., Mills, J., Platts, K., & Bourneal, M. (1997). Designing performance measures: A structured approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(11), 1131–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nemhauser, G. L., & Wolsey, L. A. (1988). Integer and combinatorial optimization. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newcomer, K. (Ed.). (1997). Using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs, New directions for evaluation (Vol. 75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parker, R. G., & Rardin, R. L. (1988). Discrete optimization. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Perrin, B. (1998). Effective use and misuse of performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Polster, C., & Newson, J. (1998). Don’t count your blessing: The social accomplishments of performance indicators’. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Critical perspective (pp. 173–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in sciences and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2-3), 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmenner, R. W., & Vollmann, T. E. (1994). Performance measures: Gaps, false alarms and the usual suspects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(12), 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomson, J., & Varley, S. (1997). Developing a balanced scorecard at AT&T. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, 1(4), 14.Google Scholar
  43. Thorburn, W. M. (1918). The myth of Occam’s razor. Mind, 27, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. U.S. Department of Energy. (1996a). Guidelines for performance measurement (DOE G 120.1-5). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.orau.gov.
  45. U.S. Department of Energy. (1996b). Critical few performance measures-definitions and methodology. Office of Environmental Management (DOE/EM).Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Department of Energy – PBM SIG (Performance-Based Management Special Interest Group). (2012). Performance-based management handbook of techniques and tools–How to measure performance (revised). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.orau.gov/pbm.
  47. U.S. Department of Energy/Nevada Operations – DOE/NV. (1994, June). Performance measurement process guidance document. DOE/NV Family Quality Forum.Google Scholar
  48. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (1994). Criteria for developing performance measurement systems in the public sector.Google Scholar
  49. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2012). Performance measurement and evaluation: Definitions and relationships (revised). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/gg98026.pdf.
  50. University of California. (2017). SMART goals: A how to guide. Retrieved September 2018, from https://www.ucop.edu.
  51. Winston, J. (1993). Performance indicators: Do they perform? Evaluation News and Comment, 2(3), 22–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiorenzo Franceschini
    • 1
  • Maurizio Galetto
    • 1
  • Domenico Maisano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP)Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations