Advertisement

Methodologies, Methods, Techniques and Tools Used on SLR Elaboration: A Mapping Study

  • Marco Palomino
  • Abraham Dávila
  • Karin Melendez
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 865)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to perform a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM) about methodologies, methods, techniques and tools used on the development of Systematic Literature Reviews (SLR). As a result, on the mapping, we expected to find and classify methodologies, methods, techniques and tools commonly used on SLR. In addition, we have considered other contexts such as, Medicine or Education with the purpose of getting multiple methodologies, methods, techniques and tools that allow performing SLR on efficient ways. It is mainly expected to identify techniques related to research questions formulation and the methods used for building search strings in order to get the higher number of studies associated to the research topic. In our study, we found multiple methodologies, methods, techniques and tools already implemented for performing SLRs On the mapping we describe some of them to highlight the most used and referenced studies.

Keywords

Systematic Literature Review Methodologies Methods Techniques 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is framed within the “Soporte a RSL” project funded by “III Fondo Concursable para la Innovación en la Docencia Universitaria” by Dirección Académica del Profesorado and partially supported by the Grupo de Investigación y Desarrollo de Ingeniería de Software (GIDIS) from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

References

  1. 1.
    Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D.: Refining the systematic literature review process—two participant-observer case studies. Empir. Softw. Eng. 15(6), 618–653 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reed, L.: performing a literature review. In: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 380–383. IEEE (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., Khalil, M., Turner, M.: Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 80(4), 571–583 (2007) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lavallee, M., Robillard, P., Mirsalari, R.: Performing systematic literature reviews with novices: an iterative approach. Trans. Educ. 57(3), 175–181 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levy, Y., Timothy, E.: A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Inf. Sci. J. 9, 171–181 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wohlin, C.: Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, p. 38. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marshall, C., Brereton, P.: Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a mapping study. In: Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 296–299. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(1), 7–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Li, Z., Budgen, D., Burn, A.: Repeatability of systematic literature reviews. In: Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), pp. 46–55 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borrego, M., Foster, M., Froyd, J.: Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. J. Eng. Educ. 103(1), 45–76 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Elsevier, Staffordshire (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghafari, M., Saleh, M., Ebrahimi, T.: A federated search approach to facilitate systematic literature review in software engineering. Int. J. Softw. Eng. & Appl. 3(2), 13 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riaz, M., Sulayman, M., Salleh, N., Mendes, E.: Experiences conducting systematic reviews from novices’ perspective. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), pp. 44–53 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carver, J., Hassler, E., Hernandes, E., Kraft, N.: Identifying barriers to the systematic literature review process. In: Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 203–212. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, H., Babar, M.: Systematic reviews in software engineering: an empirical investigation. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(7), 1341–1354 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petersen, K., Mujtaba, S., Feldt, R., Mattsson, M.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barbara, K., Budgen, D., Brereton, P.: Using mapping studies as the basis for further research – a participant–observer case study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(6), 638–651 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(9–10), 833–859 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shea, B., Grimshaw, J., Wells, G., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Bouther, L.: Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. (2007) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Popay, J., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Birtten, N.: Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a product from the ESRC methods programme (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jalali, S., Wohlin, C.: Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. In: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 29–38. ACM (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Palomino
    • 1
  • Abraham Dávila
    • 1
  • Karin Melendez
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de IngenieríaPontificia Universidad Católica del PerúLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations