Advertisement

Testbed for Identify IoT-Devices Based on Digital Object Architecture

  • Mahmood Al-BahriEmail author
  • Anton Yankovsky
  • Alexey Borodin
  • Ruslan Kirichek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11118)

Abstract

Currently, the methods of identification of devices of the Internet of things are one of the main topics due to the increase in the number of devices connected to the Internet. The use of a large number of heterogeneous physical and logical identifiers led to the fact that there were instances of their falsification, which threatens many vital processes. This article describes the architectural network model of a software and hardware complex for IoT device identification. Using the digital object architecture (DOA), it is possible to implement any of the heterogeneous identifiers to create a unique IoT snapshot of the device and store it with a unique global identifier. The article presents a method and developed the software-hardware system for enabling and facilitating the use of DOA for Identify IoT-devices. It is also proposed to develop a software and hardware complex for testing the identification procedure of “smart” devices using.

Keywords

DOA Identification Internet of Things Handle Counterfeit Prefix Suffix 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The publication has been prepared with the support of the “RUDN University Program 5-100.”

References

  1. 1.
    Kahn, R., Lyons, P.: Representing value as digital objects. J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law 5(1), 189 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahn, R., Wilensky, R.: A framework for distributed digital object services. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 6(2), 115–123 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kirichek, R., Koucheryavy, A.: Internet of Things laboratory test bed. In: Zeng, Q.-A. (ed.) Wireless Communications, Networking and Applications. LNEE, vol. 348, pp. 485–494. Springer, New Delhi (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2580-5_44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muthanna, A., Paramonov, A., Koucheryavy, A., Prokopiev, A.: Comparison of protocols for ubiquitous wireless sensor network. In: 6th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops, ICUMT 2014, pp. 334–337 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paramonov, A., Koucheryavy, A.: M2M traffic models and flow types in case of mass event detection. In: Balandin, S., Andreev, S., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN 2014. LNCS, vol. 8638, pp. 294–300. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10353-2_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirichek, R., Grishin, I., Okuneva, D., Falin, M.: Development of a node-positioning algorithm for wireless sensor networks in 3D space. In: 2016 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 279–282 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirichek, R., Kulik, V., Koucheryavy, A.: False clouds for Internet of Things and methods of protection. In: 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, pp. 201–205 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berber, F., Yahyapour, R.: A high-performance persistent identifier management protocol. In: 2017 International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage (NAS), pp. 1–10 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Ahson, S.A., Ilyas, M.: RFID Handbook: Applications, Technology, Security, and Privacy, 712 p. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirichek, R., Vladyko, A., Zakharov, M., Koucheryavy, A.: Model networks for Internet of Things and SDN. In: 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 76–79 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ateya, A.A., Muthanna, A., Gudkova, I., Vybornova, A., Koucheryavy, A.: Intelligent core network for Tactile Internet system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems, p. 15 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mihovska, A., Sarkar, M.: Smart connectivity for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. In: Yager, R.R., Pascual Espada, J. (eds.) New Advances in the Internet of Things. SCI, vol. 715, pp. 105–118. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58190-3_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lund, D., MacGillivray, C., Turner, V., Morales, M.: Worldwide and regional Internet of Things (IoT) 2014–2020 forecast: a virtuous circle of proven value and demand. International Data Corporation (IDC), Technical report, vol. 1. 29 p. (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, J.: Copyright limitations and exceptions for education and research: unity in diversity. In: Wang, J. (ed.) Conceptualizing Copyright Exceptions in China and South Africa. CLS, vol. 6, pp. 49–89. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71831-6_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    The DONA Foundation. https://dona.net/. Accessed March 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahmood Al-Bahri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anton Yankovsky
    • 1
  • Alexey Borodin
    • 2
  • Ruslan Kirichek
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.The Bonch-Bruevich Saint-Petersburg State University of TelecommunicationsSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.PJSC “Rostelecom”MoscowRussia
  3. 3.Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations