How Can We Utilize Self-service Technology Better?

  • Keiichi UedaEmail author
  • Setsuya Kurahashi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11186)


Self-service technology (SST) has been broadly recognized as a promising cost-saving alternative to a workforce. Interest in SST has been increasing owing to the imminent shortage of workforce in developed countries. In such a context, the successful implementation of SST is regarded more seriously. This study focuses on a self-service kiosk at an airport to discuss how the gaming framework contributes to exploring the successful implementation of SSTs in actual service operation. We review and discuss the results of the cooperative game that equips the autonomously behaving passengers as in the real world. Through gaming, players discuss how the new technology needs to reflect old operational practices, how people embrace and adapt to SST, and how effectively the multiple players can cooperate and coordinate to minimize the waiting time of the multiple departure lobbies as a whole. Players need to manage their staff to operate an interpersonal check-in service and to guide and support passengers using technology-based self-service equipment. They communicate with each other to secure the level of service in the ambivalent ongoing conditions. Using computer simulations, we show that the extracted ideas of queue management effectively function to accomplish tolerable waiting time by utilizing the given productive resources.


Self-service technology Agent-based modeling Airport Game Simulation Service 

Supplementary material


  1. 1.
    Berry, L.L., Seiders, K., Grewal, D.: Understanding service convenience. J. Mark. 66(3), 1–17 (2002). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bitner, M.J., Brown, S.W., Meuter, M.L.: Technology infusion in service encounters. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 28(1), 138–149 (2000). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bitner, M.J., Ostrom, A.L., Meuter, M.L.: Implementing successful self-service technologies. Acad. Manag. Executive 16(4), 96–108 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dabholkar, P.A., Bagozzi, R.P.: An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(3), 184–201 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q., 319–340 (1989). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duke, R.D.: Gaming: The Future’s Language. Wiley, Boston (1974)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gelderman, C.J., Paul, W.T., Van Diemen, R.: Choosing self-service technologies or interpersonal services? The impact of situational factors and technology-related attitudes. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 18(5), 414–421 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenblat, C.S.: Designing Games and Simulations: An Illustrated Handbook. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ito, G., Yamakage, S.: From KISS to TASS modeling: a preliminary analysis of the segregation model incorporated with spatial data on Chicago. Jpn. J. Polit. Sci. 16(4), 553–573 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurahashi, S.: State-of-the-art of social system research 4 model estimation and inverse simulation. J. Soc. Instrum. Control Eng. 52(7), 588–594 (2013). (in Japanese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liljander, V., Gillberg, F., Gummerus, J., Van Riel, A.: Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 13(3), 177–191 (2006). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J., Roundtree, R.: The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. J. Bus. Res. 56(11), 899–906 (2003). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Roundtree, R.I., Bitner, M.J.: Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. J. Mark. 64(3), 50–64 (2000). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rieber, L.P.: Seriously considering play: designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 44(2), 43–58 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sunaguchi, H., Shirai, H., Sato, R.: Evaluation of the business strategy design method using a combination of gaming and computer simulation. Stud. Simul. Gaming 26(1), 1–8 (2016). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ueda, K., Kurahashi, S.: How passenger decides a check-in option in an airport. In: Social Simulation Conference (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ueda, K., Kurahashi, S.: The passenger decision making mechanism of self-service kiosk at the airport. In: Kurahashi, S., Ohta, Y., Arai, S., Satoh, K., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10247, pp. 159–175. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ueda, K., Kurahashi, S.: Agent-based self-service technology adoption model for air-travelers: exploring best operational practices. Front. Phys. 6, 5 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Watts, C., Gilbert, N.: Simulating Innovation: Computer-Based Tools for Rethinking Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TsukubaTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations