Mutuality of Interaction
This Chapter discusses the mutuality of interaction or complexity of relationship virtue. An overview of its conditions is provided as well as examples of where this kind of process-oriented science can be found. Of all the theoretical virtues, this is the one that the science of sulphate geoengineering has come closest to fulfilling Yet, it pointed out that there are aspects of this particular virtue not fully taken advantage of as a result of the way geoengineering science is structured.
KeywordsInteraction Mutuality Feminist virtues Feminist science Midwifery Networks Agential Feedback loops
- Alaimo, S. (2008). Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Andrews, T., et al. (2012). Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, 9.Google Scholar
- Appelbaum, P. (2016). Mathematics education as a matter of curriculum. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–6). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bjornerud, M. (1997). Gaia: Gender and scientific representations of the Earth. NWSA Journal, 9(3), 89–106.Google Scholar
- Bleier, R. (1986). Introduction. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science (pp. 15–16). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Cass, L. R., & Pettenger, M. E. (2007). Conclusion: The constructions of climate change. In Kirton et al. (Eds.), The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses (pp. 235–246). New York: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Crasnow, S. (2003). In C. L. Pinnick, N. Koertge, & R. F. Almeder (Eds.), Scrutinizing feminist epistemology: An examination of gender in science (pp. 130–141). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Dimen, M. (1989). Power, sexuality and intimacy. In A. Jaggar & S. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/Body/Knowledge. Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing (pp. 34–51). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- GCRP. (2009). Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate science. Available at: https://cpo.noaa.gov/sites/cpo/Documents/pdf/ClimateLiteracyPoster-8_5x11_Final4-11LR.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2018.
- Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Embracing “Nepantla”: Rethinking knowledge and its use in teaching. REDIMAT-Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29–56.Google Scholar
- Heckman, S. (1990). Gender and knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Heyward, C., & Rayner, S. (2013). A curious asymmetry: Social science expertise and geoengineering. Climate Geoengineering Governance Project Working Paper, 7.Google Scholar
- IPCC. (2007). Fourth assessment report: Climate change 2007 (AR4). IPCC. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml#1. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.
- Keller, E. F. (1987). Feminism and science. In S. G. Harding & J. F. O’Barr (Eds.), Sex and scientific inquiry (pp. 233–246). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kirton, J. J., et al. (2013). The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses. New York: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lahsen, M. (2002). Brazilian climate epistemers’ multiple epistemes: An exploration of shared meaning, diverse identities and geopolitics in Global Change Science. Harvard University. Global Environmental Assesment Project.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E., & Lennon, K. (1997). Feminist epistemology as a local epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 71, 19–54.Google Scholar
- Spanier, B. (1995). Im/partial science: Gender ideology in molecular biology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Subramaniam, B. (2014). Ghost stories for Darwin: The science of variation and the politics of diversity. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Tillman, R. (2015). Toward a new materialism: Matter as dynamic. Minding Nature, 8, 1. http://www.humansandnature.org/toward-a-new-materialism-matter-as-dynamic. Accessed 27 Jan 2017.
- Tuana, N. (2001). Material locations: An interactionist alternative to realism/social constructivism. In Engendering Rationalities (pp. 221–243). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Wehling, P. (2006). The situated materiality of scientific practices: Postconstructivism–a new theoretical perspective in science studies? Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 1(1), 81.Google Scholar
- Yousefi, B. (1998). Dissecting the ethical scientist: Baha’i and feminist perspectives. MA thesis, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar