In this Chapter, the feminist virtue of ontological heterogeneity is addressed as it relates to SO2 climate engineering. In particular, the scientific practices that underlie sulfate geoengineering studies with respect to whether it fulfills the principles of feminist epistemology laid out by Helen Longino and FCE is examined. Overall, it is argued that this approach to climate change mitigation does not.
KeywordsHeterogeneity Modeling Feminist empiricism Helen Longino Geoengineering Sulphate Volcanoes Rural Urban
- Alston, M. (2015). Women and climate change in Bangladesh. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boden, T., et al. (2010). Global, regional, and national fossil-Fuel CO 2 emissions tech. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- Boyd, R. (1991). Observations, explanatory power, and simplicity: Toward a non-Humean account. In R. Boyd, P. Gasper, & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science (pp. 349–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Curry, C. L., et al. (2014). A multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119(7), 3900–3923.Google Scholar
- Dankelman, I. (2010). Gender and climate change: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- EPA. (2016). Global greenhouse gas emissions data. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data#Sector. Accessed 20 Nov 2016.
- Ferraro, A. J., Highwood, E. J., & Charlton-Perez, A. J. (2014). Weakened tropical circulation and reduced precipitation in response to geoengineering. Environmental Research Letters, 9(1), 014001. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/014001/meta. Accessed 22 Nov 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fink, J. H. (2013). Geoengineering cities to stabilise climate. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, ES5, 242–248.Google Scholar
- Forster, P., et al. (2007). Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In S. Solomon et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ge, M., et al. (2014). 6 graphs explain the world’s top 10 emitters. World Resource Institute. http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/11/6-graphs-explain-world’s-top-10-emitters. Accessed 22 Nov 2016.
- Gerber, P. J., Henderson, B., & Makkar, H. P. (2013). Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production. A review of technical options for non-CO 2 emissions. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- Habtezion, S. (2013). Overview of linkages between gender and climate change. United Nations Development Programme. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/gender/Gender%20and%20Environment/PB1-AP-Overview-Gender-and-climate-change.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2016.
- Hessing, M. (1993). Women and sustainability: Ecofeminist perspectives. Alternatives Journal, 1(19), 14.Google Scholar
- Hodder, I. (1997). Interpreting archaeology: Finding meaning in the past. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Kellert, S. H., et al. (2006). Scientific pluralism (Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science). Minnesota: Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Khondker, H. H., & Schuerkens, U. (2014). Social transformation, development and globalization. Sociopedia.isa, International Sociological Association. https://doi.org/10.1177/205684601423.
- Kovács, Á. (2012). Gender in the substance of chemistry, Part 1: The ideal gas. HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 18(2), 95–120. http://hyle.org/journal/issues/18-2/kovacs1.htm. Accessed 19 Dec 2016.
- Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E. (2008). Values, heuristics, and the politics of knowledge. In M. Carrier, D. Howard, & J. Kourany (Eds.), The challenge of the social and the pressure of practice, science and values revisited (pp. 68–86). Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E. (2013a). Studying human behavior: How scientists investigate aggression and sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. (2013b). Subjects, power and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 101–120). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E., & Lennon, K. (1997). Feminist epistemology as a local epistemology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 71, 19–54.Google Scholar
- NCAR/UCAR. (2017). New approach to geoengineering simulations is significant step forward. NCAR/UCAR AtmosNews. Available at: https://www2.ucar.edu/atmosnews/news/129835/new-approach-geoengineering-simulations-significant-step-forward. Accessed 6 May 2018.
- Nhanenge, J. (2011). Ecofeminism: Towards integrating the concerns of women, poor people, and nature into development. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
- Niemeier, U., Schmidt, H., Alterskjær, K., & Kristjánsson, J. E. (2013). Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(21), 11905–11917.Google Scholar
- NSSO. (2011). National accounts statistics. Government of India, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. http://www.mospi.gov.in/publication/national-accounts-statistics-2011. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
- Rasch, P. J, Tilmes, S, Turco, R. P, Robock, A Oman, L, Chen, C, Stenchikov, G. L, & Garcia, R. R. (2008, November). An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols. Philosophical Transactions. Series A Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 366(1882), 4007–4037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. (2006). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Saurin, J. (1996). International relations, social ecology and the globalisation of environmental change. In J. Volger & M. F. Imber (Eds.), The environment and international relations, global environmental change series. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Scheffran, J., et al. (2016). Climate engineering: Potential pathways, consequences and risks. Hamburg: Research Group Climate Change and Security (CLISEC), KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
- Sedjo, R. A. (2010). Adaptation of forests to climate change. Resources for the Future, DP, 10-06.Google Scholar
- Spanier, B. (1995). Im/partial science: Gender ideology in molecular biology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Steinfeld, H., et al. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow. FAO: Rome.Google Scholar
- Strickland, S. (2012). Feminism, postmodernism and difference. In K. Lennon & M. Whitford (Eds.), Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology (pp. 265–274). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Trenberth, K. E., & Dai, A. (2007). Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, 15. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2007GL030524/full. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
- Victor, D. G, et al. (2009, March–April). The geoengineering option: A last resort against global warming? Geoengineering. Council on Foreign Affairs. Accessed 19 Nov 2016.Google Scholar
- Wallerstein, I. (1992). The concept of national development, 1917–1989: Elegy and requiem. American Behavioral Scientist, 35, 517–529.Google Scholar
- Warrick, R. A., & Ahmad, Q. K. (2012). The implications of climate and sea-level change for Bangladesh. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar