Advertisement

Application of Integrodifferential Equations Using Sumudu Transform in Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy MAGDM Problems

  • P. John Robinson
  • S. Jeeva
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Trends in Mathematics book series (TM)

Abstract

Decision-making is a most powerful, well-organized, civic, and pecuniary effect. Power to produce logical and correct choices is the burden of any decision process imbued with uncertainty. In offices where the information or the data is of the form of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, to construct the MAGDM problem, intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy weighted geometric (ITFWG) and intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy hybrid geometric (ITFHG) operators are applied. In this paper, a novel method of deriving the unknown decision-maker weights using Sumudu transform combined with integrodifferential equation is proposed, and the derived weights are used in computations for identifying the best alternative. A goodness of fit for this method is provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 20(1), 87–96 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atanassov, k., Gargov, G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 31, 343–349 (1989)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bulut, H., Baskonus, H.M., Belgacem, F.B.M.: The analytical solution of some fractional ordinary differential equations by the Sumudu transform method. A.Appl.Anal. Article ID 203875, 1–6 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eltayeb, H., Kilicman, A.: A note on the Sumudu transform and differential equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences. 4(22), 1089–1098 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerstenkorn, T., Manko, J.: Correlation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 44, 39–43 (1991)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeeva, S., Robinson, J.P., Application of Sumudu Transform in Intuitionistic Fuzzy MAGDM Problems. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. 119(11), 109–117, (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hukuhara, M.: Integration des applications measurable don’t la value rest un compact convexe. Funkcial. Ekvac. 10, 205–229 (1967)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khan, N.A., Razzaq, O.A.: On the solution of fuzzy differential equations by Fuzzy Sumudu Transform. Nonlinear Engineering. 4(1), 49–60 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, D.F.: Multi attribute decision-making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 70, 73–85 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, D-F., Ye Y-F.: Interval-valued least square prenucleolus of interval-valued cooperative games and a simplified method. Operational Research. 18(1), 205–220 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, D-F., Wan, S-P.: Minimum Weighted Minkowski Distance Power Models for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Madm with Incomplete Weight Information, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making. 16(5), 1387–1408 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, J-C., Li, D-F.: Correlations to TOPSIS-Based Nonlinear-Programming Methodology for Multiattribute Decision making With Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems. 26(1), 391 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: A short primer on the correlation coefficient of Vague sets. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications. 1(12), 55–69 (2011a) https://doi.org/10.4018/ijfsa.2011040105 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H., Extended TOPSIS with correlation coefficient of Triangular Intuitionistic fuzzy sets for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology. 3(3), 15–40 (2011b) https://doi.org/10.4018/jdsst.2011070102 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: Vague Correlation coefficient of Interval Vague sets. International Journal of fuzzy System Applications. 2(1), 18–34 (2012a)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: A search for the Correlation coefficient of Triangular and Trapezoidal intuitionistic Fuzzy sets for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Communications in computer and Information Sciences-283, Springer-Verlag. 333–342 (2012b)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: A Strategic TOPSIS algorithm with correlation coefficient of interval vague sets. International Journal of Computing Algorithm. 2, 314–33 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: MADM Problems with Correlation Coefficient of Trapezoidal Fuzzy Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Advances in Decision Sciences. 2014, 1–10 (2014a)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: MAGDM-Miner: A New Algorithm for Mining Trapezoidal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Correlation Rules, International Journal of Decision Support System Technology. 6(1), 34–58 (2014b)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: Efficient Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Models with Correlation Coefficient of Vague sets. International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems. 5(3), 27–51 (2014c)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: MAGDM Problems with Correlation coefficient of Triangular Fuzzy IFS. International Journal of Fuzzy Applications. 4(1), 1–32 (2015) https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFSA.2015010101 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robinson, J.P., Amirtharaj, E.C.H.: Multiple Attribute Group Decision Analysis for Intuitionistic Triangular and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications. 5(3), 42–76 (2016) https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFSA.2016070104 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robinson, J.P., Jeeva, S.: Mining Trapezoidal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Correlation Rules for Eigen Valued Magdm Problems. International Journal of Control Theory and Applications. 9(7), 585–616 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robinson, J.P., Jeeva, S.: Application of Jacobian & Sor Iteration process in Intuitionistic Fuzzy MAGDM Problems. Mathematical Sciences International Research Journal. 6(2), 130–134 (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 114, 505–518 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Control and Cybernetics. 31, 1037–1053 (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, J.Q., Zhang, Z.: Multi-criteria decision-making method with incomplete certain information based on intuitionistic fuzzy number, Control Decision. 24, 226–230 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wei, G.: Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Applied Soft Computing. 10(2), 423–431 (2010a)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wei, G.: Some arithmetic aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. Journal of Computers. 5(3), 345–351 (2010b). https://doi.org/10.4304/jcp.5.3.345-351 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wu, J., Cao, Q-W.: Same families of geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Applied Mathematical Modelling. 37, 318–327 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.03.001.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu, Z.S.: Dynamic Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 48(1), 246–262 (2008).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu, Z.S., Chen, J.: On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. in: Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2007). 2, 466–471 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu, Z.S., Yager, R.R.: Some geometric aggregation operators based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy sets. International Journal of General Systems, 35, 417–433 (2006).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 18, 183–190 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yu, G-F., Li, D-F.: Application of satisfactory degree to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 32(1), 1019–1028 (2017)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yu, G-F., Li., D-F., Qiu, J-M., Zheng X-X.: Some operators of intuitionistic uncertain 2-tuple linguistic variables and application to multi-attribute group decision making with heterogeneous relationiship among attributes. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 34(1), 599–611 (2018)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control. 8(3), 338–356 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. John Robinson
    • 1
  • S. Jeeva
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsBishop Heber CollegeTrichyIndia

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options