Kurdish Movement’s Democratic Autonomy Proposals in Turkey

  • Cengiz Gunes
  • Çetin Gürer
Part of the Comparative Territorial Politics book series


From the early 2000s onwards, Turkey’s Kurdish movement has been conceptualising the accommodation of Kurdish political demands for autonomy and self-rule in Turkey around the ‘democratic autonomy’ proposal. This proposal is based on a critique and rejection of the nation-state model and seeks to accommodate the rights of Kurds and other ethnic and religious minorities without challenging Turkey’s territorial integrity. It involves creation of decentralised local self-governance structures that are designed to involve citizens in the decision-making process and empower communities to engage in solving the immediate problems that they face. This chapter examines the key texts through which democratic autonomy proposal has been articulated to unpack what it entails and the specific demands for minority groups it puts forward.


  1. Akkaya, A. H., & Jongerden, J. (2011). The PKK in the 2000s: Continuity Through Breaks? In Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue (pp. 143–162). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Akkaya, A. H., & Jongerden, J. (2013). Confederalism and Autonomy in Turkey: The Kurdistan Workers’ Party and the Reinvention of Democracy. In C. Gunes & W. Zeydanlıoğlu (Eds.), The Kurdish Question in Turkey: New Perspectives on Violence, Representation and Reconciliation (pp. 186–204). London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  3. Demokratik Toplum Kongresi (DTK). (2012). Kürt Sorununun Çözümü İçin Demokratik Özerklik [Democratic Autonomy as a Solution for the Kurdish Question]. Diyarbakır: Aram.Google Scholar
  4. Gunes, C. (2012). The Kurdish National Movement in Turkey: From Protest to Resistance. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Gunes, C. (November–December 2017). Turkey’s New Left. New Left Review, 107, 9–30.Google Scholar
  6. Guneser, H. (Tr.). (2017). The Political Thought of Abdullah Öcalan. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gürer, Ç. (2015). Demokratik Özerklik: Bir Yurttaşlık Heterotopyası [Democratic Autonomy as a Heterotopia of Citizenship]. Ankara: Notabene.Google Scholar
  8. Happel, K. (2006). Introduction. In A. Öcalan, Prison Writings: The Roots of Civilisation (K. Happel, Trans.). Pluto Press: London.Google Scholar
  9. HDP. (2012). Parti Programı.
  10. HDP. (2015). Büyük İnsanlık-Bizler Meclise. Ankara.Google Scholar
  11. Negri, A., & Hardt, M. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Nimni, E. (Ed.). (2005). National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Nimni, E., Osipov, A., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2013). The Challenge of Non-territorial Autonomy Theory and Practice. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishers. Google Scholar
  14. Öcalan, A. (1993). Kürdistan Devriminin Yolu [The Path of Kurdistan Revolution]. Köln: Wêşenen Serxwebun.Google Scholar
  15. Öcalan, A. (1999). Savunma: Kürt Sorununda Demokratik Çözüm Bildirgesi [Defence: The Democratic Solution Declaration for the Kurdish Question]. Istanbul: Mem Yayınları.Google Scholar
  16. Öcalan, A. (2004). Bir Halkı Savunmak [Defending a People]. İstanbul: Çetin Yayınları.Google Scholar
  17. PKK. (2005). Program ve Tüzüğü. Cologne: Weşanên Serxwebûn.Google Scholar
  18. PKK. (2009). Kürt Sorununda Çözüme Doǧru Demokratik Özerklik [A Solution for the Kurdish Question: Democratic Autonomy]. Abdullah Öcalan Sosyal Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cengiz Gunes
    • 1
  • Çetin Gürer
    • 2
  1. 1.Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations