Advertisement

Extraversion Affects Attentive Processes of Personal Images

  • Pietro Cipresso
  • Miriam Fanciullo
  • Giuseppe Riva
  • Emanuela Saita
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 253)

Abstract

Personality traits are an important part of the psychology with so many study to consider this actually a huge field. On the other hand, the relationship between personality traits and attentional process has not been deepen extended yet, above all using technological advanced measures to quantify attention. In this study we selected personal and neutral photos presenting all of them to the participants while tracking the eyes movements by using an eye-tracker. Results showed that personal images have in general higher number of fixation and more saccades. Specifically, while extroverts showed no differences in exploring personal and neutral photos, introverts participants showed an higher number of fixations and more saccades for personal images than neutral. These results if confirmed in further studies pone interesting questions about the role of personality in attentional processes linked to personal experiences.

Keywords

Psychometrics Personality Attention Personal images Extraversion Eye-tracking 

References

  1. 1.
    Mikels, J.A., Frederickson, B.L., Larkin, G.R., Lindberg, C.M., Maglio, S.J., Reuter-Lorenz, P.A.: Emotional category data on images from the international affective picture system. Behav. Res. Methods 5(4), 626–630 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher, R., Milfont, T.L.: Standardization in psychological research. Int. J. Psychol. Res. 31(1), 88–96 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allé, M.C., Manning, L., Potheegadoo, J., Coutelle, R., Danion, J.M., Berna, F.: Wearable cameras are useful tools to investigate and remediate autobiographical memory impairment: a systematic PRISMA review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 27(1), 81–99 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rubin, D.C.: Emotion and autobiographical memory: considerations from posttraumatic stress disorder. Phys. Life Rev. 7(1), 132–133 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mowincke, A.M., Pedersen, M.L., Eilertsen, E., Biele, G.: A meta-analysis of decision-making and attention in adults with ADHD. J Atten. Disord. 19(5), 355–367 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann Jr., W.B.: A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. J. Res. Pers. 37, 504–528 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parker, J.D., Taylor, G.J., Bagby, R.M.: The 20-item toronto alexithymia scale: III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population. J. Psychosoma Res. 55(3), 269–275 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pedrabissi, L., Santinello, M.: Verifica della validità dello STAI forma Y di Spielberger. Giunti Organizzazioni Speciali 191–192, 11–14 (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatr. 25(1), 49–59 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pietro Cipresso
    • 1
    • 2
  • Miriam Fanciullo
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Riva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emanuela Saita
    • 2
  1. 1.Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology LabIstituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations