Skip to main content

Enhancing the Implicit Association Test: A Four-Step Model to Find Appropriate Stimuli

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 29))

Abstract

The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a promising tool to assess implicit attitudes. Next to neuroscientific methods applied within the field of NeuroIS the IAT helps to overcome limits of traditional approaches, such as self-report studies. Introduced 20 years ago, it has been developed further within subsequent years. However, hardly any attention has been paid to optimize the stimuli sets. This is unfortunate, as if the time span participants need to decode the stimuli varies across the IAT, or if the subjects do not understand the stimuli equally, reaction times can be biased. As an IAT includes 120 measuring points per subject such biases might potentiate across all participants. The results might be biased and neither the researchers nor the participants would recognize such confounding effects. Thus, we focus on the time span between stimulus onset and response and develop a four-step model to create an optimized stimuli set including (1) brainstorming, (2) forming & performing (i.e. pretesting), (3) backward-brainstorming and (4) informing & interviewing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dimoka, A.: What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Q. 34(2), 373–396 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Riedl, R., Javor, A.: The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology, and functional brain imaging. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 5(2), 63–91 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Walla, P., Koller, M.: Emotion is not what you think it is: Startle reflex modulation (SRM) as a measure of affective processing in NeuroIS. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience, Gmunden Retreat on Neuro IS 2015, pp. 181–186. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dortrecht, London (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gawronski, B., De Houwer, J.: Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In: Reis, H.T., Judd, C.M. (eds.) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, pp. 283–310. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregg, A.P., Klymowsky, J., Owens, D., Perryman, A.: Let their fingers do the talking? Using the Implicit Association Test in market research. Int. J. Market Res. 55(4), 23–39 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosshard, S., Bourke, J.D., Kunaharan, S., Koller, M., Walla, P.: Established liked versus disliked brands: brain activity, implicit associations and explicit responses. Cogent Psychol. 3, 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walla, P., Koller, M., Brenner, G., Bosshard, S.: Evaluative conditioning of established brands: implicit measures reveal other effects than explicit measures. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 10(1), 24–41 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio, R.H., Olson, M.A.: Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 54, 297–327 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gawronski, B., Strack, F.: On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: dissonance changes explicit but not implicit attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 535–542 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rydell, R.J., McConnell, A.R., Mackie, D.M., Strain, L.M.: Of two minds: forming and changing valence-inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 17(11), 954–958 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Nosek, B.A.: Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: an improved scoring algorithm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 197–216 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A.: Health of the implicit association test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 48, 85–93 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L., Banaji, M.R.: Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97(1), 17–41 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lane, K.A., Banaji, M.R., Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G.: Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV—what we know (so far) about the method. In: Wittenbrink, B., Schwarz, N. (eds.) From Implicit Measures of Attitudes, pp. 59–102. The Guilford Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R.: The Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31, 166–180 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R.: The Implicit Association Test at age 7: a methodological conceptual review. In: Bargh, J.A. (ed.) Automatic Processes in Social Thinking and Behavior, pp. 265–292. Psychology Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., Schwartz, J.L.K.: Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiedler, K., Messner, C., Bluemke, M.: Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: a logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 17, 74–147 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gattol, V., Sääksjärvi, M., Carbon, C.-C.: Extending the Implicit Association Test (IAT): assessing consumer attitudes based on multi-dimensional implicit associations. PloS ONE 6 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Project Implicit: https://implicit.harvard.edu. Last accessed 21 Mar 2018

  21. Westgate, E.C., Riskind, R.G., Nosek, B.A.: Implicit preferences for straight people over lesbian women and gay men weakened from 2006 to 2013. Collabra 1(1), 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Brenner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brenner, G., Koller, M., Walla, P. (2019). Enhancing the Implicit Association Test: A Four-Step Model to Find Appropriate Stimuli. In: Davis, F., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics