Advertisement

How about Professionalism, Professions and Standards: The Creation of Acculturated Professionals

  • Fernando F. PadróEmail author
  • Megan Y. C. A. Kek
  • Nona Press
  • Karen Trimmer
  • Jonathan H. Green
  • Michael Hawke
  • Laurie Hawke
Chapter

Abstract

Professional education is both an epistemological and ontological experience. The end game is to be a practitioner within a selected profession that satisfies personal expectations while contributing to society through practice. There is a triadic sensemaking relationship between the individual wanting to be a professional, the higher education institution (HEI) providing the preparatory curriculum and related experiences and the different stakeholders who employ the new professional and those expecting intellectual capital and productivity gains from these new professionals. Therefore, quality is a many-sided perception dependent on whose purpose frames its evaluation and the extent to which outcomes are determined to be gains. This chapter discusses the various perspectives of what quality is and the transferability of determinations between the different perceivers.

Keywords

Autopoiesis Immanent Intentional Quality FOR purpose Quality OF purpose Stakeholder Temporality 

References

  1. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2012). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. In L. Moller & J. B. Huett (Eds.), The next generation of distance education: Unconstrained learning (pp. 49–69). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. The Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askenazy, P., & Galbis, E. M. (2007). The impact of technological and organizational changes on labor flows. Evidence on French establishments. Labour, 21(2), 265–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audi, R. (1988). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Banks, S. (2010). Integrity in professional life: Issues of conduct, commitment and capacity. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2168–2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bekkers, V., & Edwards, A. (2007). Legitimacy and democracy: A conceptual framework for assessing governance practices. In V. Bekkers, G. Dijkstra, A. Edwards, & M. Fenger (Eds.), Governance and the democratic deficit: Assessing the democratic legitimacy of governance practices (pp. 35–60). Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  8. Billett, S. (2010). Emerging perspectives of work: Implications for university learning and teaching. In J. Higgs, I. Goulter, S. Loftus, J. Reid, & F. Trede (Eds.), Education for future practice (pp. 97–112). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2008). Job values in professional education: The role of achievement goals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(3), 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. (1996). Frames for thinking: Ways of making meaning. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 93–105). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Büthe, T. (2002). Taking temporality seriously: Modeling history and the use of narratives as evidence. The American Political Science Review, 96(3), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chaudhuri, D., Mukhopadhyay, A. R., & Ghosn, S. K. (2011). Assessment of engineering colleges through application of the six sigma metrics in a state of India. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 28(9), 969–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng, M. (2016). Quality in education: Developing a virtue of professional practice. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crowe, J. (2007). Dworkin on the value of integrity. Deakin Law Review, 12(1), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deleuse, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Deming, W. E. (1994). The new economics for industry, government, education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dewey, J. (1887). Psychology. New York: Harper & Brothers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  25. Edgar, A., & Pattison, S. (2011). Integrity and the moral complexity of professional practice. Nursing Philosophy, 12, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elassy, N. (2015). The concepts of quality, quality assurance and quality enhancement. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(3), 250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academy Emergency Medicine, 15, 988–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eriksen, A. (2015). What is professional integrity? Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 9(2), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feigenbaum, A. V. (1983). Total quality control (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic—On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  34. Friedman, L. (1995). C.S. Peirce’s transcendental and immanent realism. Transactions of The Charles S. Peirce Society, 31(2), 374–392.Google Scholar
  35. Giddens, A. (1968). ‘Power’ in the recent writings of Talcott Parsons. Sociology, 2(3), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gobet, F., Lane, P. C. R., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C.-H., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hagström, L., & Scheja, M. (2014). Using meta-reflection to improve learning and throughput: Redesigning assessment procedures in a political science course on power. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity. In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  39. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heidegger, M. (2008/1927). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  41. Hershey, J.L. (2007). The lived experience of becoming a professional nurse for associate degree nursing graduates: A phenomenological study. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  42. Higgs, J., & Titchen, A. (2001). Rethinking the practice-knowledge interface in an uncertain world: A model for practice development. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(11), 526–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hindle, K., Klyver, K., & Jennings, D. F. (2009). An ‘informed’ intent model: Incorporating human capital, social capital, and gender variables into the theoretical model of entrepreneurial intentions. In A. L. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box (pp. 35–50). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hollander, E. P., & Willis, R. H. (1967). Some current issues in the psychology of conformity and nonconformity. Psychological Bulletin, 68(1), 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Howard, S. A. (2015). Metaemotional intentionality. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98, 406–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. B. Gibson, Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwind LTD.Google Scholar
  47. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Volume I. New York: Henry Holt and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jarvis, P. (1999). The practitioner-researcher: Developing theory from practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). The quality control process. In J. M. Juran, A. B. Godfrey, R. E. Hoogstoel, & E. G. Schilling (Eds.), Juran’s quality handbook (5th ed., pp. 4.1–4.29). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. Juran, J. M., & Gryna, F. M., Jr. (1970). Quality planning and analysis: From product development through usage. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Martens, J.-B. (2009). User experience over time: An initial framework. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009 (pp. 729–738). Boston, MA, 4–9 April 2009.Google Scholar
  53. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Kemmis, S. (2005). Knowing practice: Searching for salience. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 13(3), 391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. King, M., & Thornhill, C. (2003). Niklas Luhmann’s theory of politics and law. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee, D. H., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1994). Toward a predictive model of the consumer inference process: The role of expertise. Psychology & Marketing, 11(2), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). The communication of meaning in anticipatory systems: A simulation study of the dynamics of intentionality in social interactions. In D. M. Dubois (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing Anticipatory Systems CASYS’07, Liège, Belgium, 6–11 August 2007 (Vol. 1051, pp. 33–49). Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
  59. Lieberherr, E. (2013). The role of throughput in the input-output legitimacy debate: Insights from public and private governance modes in the Swiss and English water sectors. Paper presented at ICPP 2013, Panel 39: The New Policies of Privatization, June 26–28, Grenoble, France. Retrieved from http://archives.ippapublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_39_s2_lieberherr.pdf
  60. Lindberg, M. (2014). Implications of the Bologna process for throughput in the higher education sector: An empirical illustration based on a Finnish-British comparison. European Journal of Education, 49(2), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Locke, J. (1689/1952). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  62. Lomas, L. (2004). Embedding quality: The challenges for higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(4), 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems (J. Bednarz & D. Baecker, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Luhmann, N. (1997). The limits of steering. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Theorizing about curriculum: Conceptions and definitions. International Journal of Scholarly Intellectual Diversity, 13(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  66. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice—New directions for adult and continuing education, no. 74 (pp. 5–12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  68. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in Progress (pp. 3–34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  69. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  70. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mockler, N. (2018). Teaching quality is not teacher quality. How we talk about ‘quality’ matters, here’s why. EduResearch Matters (blog). Retrieved from Australian Education Research Association website: http://www.aare.edu.au/blog/?p=2845&utm_campaign=website
  73. Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Noordegraaf, M. (2011). Remaking professionals? How associations and professional education connect professionalism and organizations. Current Sociology, 59(4), 465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Padró, F. F. (1988). Quality circles and their existence in present-day school administration. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  76. Padró, F. F., & Green, J. H. (in press). Education administrators in wonderland: Figuring out how policy-making and regulatory compliance when making decisions. In K. Trimmer, R. Dixon, & Y. Findlay (Eds.), Education and the law: Considering the legal context of schools. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer International Publishing AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Padró, F. F., & Hawke, M. F. (2003). A perceptual model of organization behavior. National Social Sciences Journal, 19(2), 102–112.Google Scholar
  78. Padró, F. F., Hawke, M. F., & Hawke, L. M. (2016). Assessment and quality: Policy-steering and the making of a deus ex machina. In J. Bower & P. L. Thomas (Eds.), De-testing and de-grading schools: Authentic alternatives to accountability and standardization (Revised ed., pp. 33–50). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  79. Parsons, T. (1963). On the concepts of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107(3), 232–262.Google Scholar
  80. Parsons, T. (1981/1951). The social system. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Parsons, T., Bales, R. F., & Shils, E. A. (1953). Working papers in the theory of action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  82. Pascale, R. T. (1999). Surfing at the edge of chaos. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 83–94.Google Scholar
  83. Peirce, C. S. (1958). Values on a universe of chance: Charles S. Peirce: Selected writings (P. P. Wiener, Ed.). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  84. Peirce, C. S. (1994). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Electronic edition (C. Hartshorne & P. Wiess, Eds., vols. 1–6, 1935; A. W. Burk, Ed., vols. 7–8, 1958). Retrieved from https://colorysemiotica.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/peirce-collectedpapers.pdf
  85. Pitsoe, V. J., & Letseka, M. (2018). Heidegger and Althusser on quality management systems in open and distance learning. In L. Kounis (Ed.), Quality management systems: A selective presentation of case-studies showcasing its evolution (pp. 47–60). London: IntechOpen.Google Scholar
  86. Press, N. I. (2018). Educating for a profession: A phenomenological case study of professional practice preparation for the Nursing discipline from a sociocultural perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland.Google Scholar
  87. Press, N., & Padró, F. F. (2017). Educating for a profession: Curriculum as transformation and curriculum transformation. In R. G. Walker & S. B. Bedford (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Curriculum transformation, 40 (pp. 313–322). Sydney, Australia, 27–30 June 2017.Google Scholar
  88. Reeves, C. A., & Bednar, D. A. (1994). Defining quality: Alternatives and implications. The Academy of Management Review, Special Issue: “Total Quality”, 19(3), 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Robinson, A. (2010). Trinity, evolution, and the metaphysical semiotics of C.S. Peirce. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Roest, H., & Rindfleisch, A. (2010). The influence of quality cues and typicality cues on restaurant purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rogers, A. (2014). The base of the iceberg: Informal learning and its impact on formal and non-formal learning. Opladen, Germany: Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sahi, G., Gupta, M. C., & Patel, P. C. (2017). A measure of throughput orientation: Scale development and nomological validation. Decision Sciences, 48(3), 420–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Schumpeter, J. A. (2003). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Seidl, D. (2004). Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic social systems. Munich Business Research Paper 2004-2. Munich, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.Google Scholar
  96. Sheehan, T., & Palmer, R.E. (Eds.). (1997). Edmund Husserl, Psychological and transcendental phenomenology and the confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931): The Encyclopedia Britannica Article, the Amsterdam Lectures, ‘Phenomenology and Anthropology’, and Husserl’s Marginal Notes in Being and Time and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Collected Works, Volume 6. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  97. Steinbock, A. J. (2001). (Transl.). Edmund Husserl: Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  98. Swan, D. (1998). The changing university: Fitness of purpose. Irish Educational Studies, 17(1), 272–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Taylor, E. W. (2009). Fostering transformative learning. In J. Mezirow, E. W. Taylor, & Associates (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 3–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  100. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Van Meerkerk, I., Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2015). Connective management and governance network performance: The mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Space, 33(4), 746–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Vanderstraeten, R. (2002). Parsons, Luhmann and the theorem of double contingency. Journal of Classical Sociology, 2(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  104. Westbroek, H. B., Klaassen, K., Bulte, A., & Pilot, A. (2010). Providing students with a sense of purpose by adapting a professional practice. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 603–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wong, Q. Y.-Y. (2012). An alternative view of quality assurance and enhancement. Management in Education, 26(1), 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wittgenstein, L. (1986). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  107. Yielder, J. (2004). An integrated model of professional expertise and its implications for higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 23(1), 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando F. Padró
    • 1
    Email author
  • Megan Y. C. A. Kek
    • 1
  • Nona Press
    • 1
  • Karen Trimmer
    • 1
  • Jonathan H. Green
    • 1
  • Michael Hawke
    • 2
  • Laurie Hawke
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Tarleton State UniversityStephenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations