Advertisement

Abstract

Displacement estimation is a critical step in ultrasound elastography and failing to estimate displacement correctly can result in large errors in strain images. As conventional ultrasound elastography techniques suffer from decorrelation noise, they are prone to fail in estimating displacement between echo signals obtained during tissue deformations. This study proposes a novel elastography technique which addresses the decorrelation in estimating displacement field. We call our method GLUENet (GLobal Ultrasound Elastography Network) which uses deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to get a coarse but robust time-delay estimation between two ultrasound images. This displacement is later used for formulating a nonlinear cost function which incorporates similarity of RF data intensity and prior information of estimated displacement [3]. By optimizing this cost function, we calculate the finer displacement exploiting all the information of all the samples of RF data simultaneously. The coarse displacement estimate generated by CNN is substantially more robust than the Dynamic Programming (DP) technique used in GLUE for finding the coarse displacement estimates. Our results validate that GLUENet outperforms GLUE in simulation, phantom and in-vivo experiments.

Keywords

Convolutional neural network Ultrasound elastography Time-delay estimation TDE Deep learning Global elastography 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research has been supported in part by NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2015-04136). We would like to thank Microsoft Azure Research for a cloud computing grant and NVIDIA for GPU donation. The ultrasound data was collected at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The principal investigators were Drs. E. Boctor, M. Choti, and G. Hager. We thank them for sharing the data with us.

References

  1. 1.
    Amundsen, B.H., et al.: Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47(4), 789–793 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dosovitskiy, A., et al.: FlowNet: learning optical flow with convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2758–2766 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hashemi, H.S., Rivaz, H.: Global time-delay estimation in ultrasound elastography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 64(10), 1625–1636 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoerig, C., Ghaboussi, J., Insana, M.F.: An information-based machine learning approach to elasticity imaging. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 16(3), 805–822 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hussain, M.A., Anas, E.M.A., Alam, S.K., Lee, S.Y., Hasan, M.K.: Direct and gradient-based average strain estimation by using weighted nearest neighbor cross-correlation peaks. IEEE TUFFC 59(8), 1713–1728 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ilg, E., Mayer, N., Saikia, T., Keuper, M., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T.: FlowNet 2.0: evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), vol. 2 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen, J.A.: FIELD: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 34(suppl. 1, pt. 1), 351–353 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kibria, M.G., Hasan, M.K.: A class of kernel based real-time elastography algorithms. Ultrasonics 61, 88–102 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, Y., Audigier, C., Ziegle, J., Friebe, M., Boctor, E.M.: Ultrasound thermal monitoring with an external ultrasound source for customized bipolar RF ablation shapes. IJCARS 13(6), 815–826 (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ophir, J., et al.: Elastography: imaging the elastic properties of soft tissues with ultrasound. J. Med. Ultra. 29(4), 155–171 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pesavento, A., Perrey, C., Krueger, M., Ermert, H.: A time-efficient and accurate strain estimation concept for ultrasonic elastography using iterative phase zero estimation. IEEE TUFFC 46(5), 1057–1067 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rivaz, H., Boctor, E.M., Choti, M.A., Hager, G.D.: Real-time regularized ultrasound elastography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(4), 928–945 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE TIP 13(4), 600–612 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zahiri-Azar, R., Salcudean, S.E.: Motion estimation in ultrasound images using time domain cross correlation. IEEE TMB 53(10), 1990–2000 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.PERFORM CentreMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations