Advertisement

Evaluation of Impact of Climate Changes in the Lower Seyhan Irrigation Project Area, Turkey

  • Keisuke HoshikawaEmail author
  • Takanori Nagano
  • Takashi Kume
  • Tsugihiro Watanabe
Chapter
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 18)

Abstract

This study quantitatively assesses the impacts of climate change on the irrigated agriculture of the Lower Seyhan Irrigation Project (LSIP) area in Turkey in the 2070s by factoring the projected future climate data into computational simulations of crop growth and the hydrological structure. According to simulation results by models registered to Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) with the representative concentration (RCP) 8.5 scenario, annual temperatures and precipitation around the Mediterranean region in 2081–2100 are, respectively, 4–5 °C higher and 10–20% smaller than those in 1986–2005. To assess the effects on these factors at the same time, a grid-based distributed hydrological model – IMPAM (Irrigation Management Performance Assessment Model) – was used. IMPAM, which includes modules for quasi three-dimensional soil-water dynamics, evapo-transpiration, crop-growth, irrigation and seepage, and drainage was developed by the authors for the simulation of the hydrology in irrigated agricultural areas. Three scenarios of adaptation to climate change were employed for the simulations: (a) adaptation without a large amount of investment for water management, (b) increasing the irrigation area, and (c) increasing the net amount of water applied to crops with decreasing water diversion from the river and the introduction of groundwater irrigation for 21,900 ha of orchards. Climate data for the 2070s that was used in this study was derived through RCM (Regional Climate Model) downscaling of the NCEP-reanalysis data and results of two GCMs (MRI-CGCM2 and CCSR/NIES-CGCM) with the “pseudo warming” method. The results revealed that the direct effect of global warming on the hydrology of the LSIP may not be large enough to affect agricultural production. The effect of the sea-level rise might be limited to the range of a few kilometres from the coastline with scarce field crop areas. The reason why the effect of climate change on crop cultivation in the LSIP is not significantly larger than changes in water management is the existing water management, with plentiful water application, including losses. Even the scenarios with large decreases in water diversion from the Seyhan River brought positive effects to hydrological conditions and crop growth through the improvement of over-humidity. The average ratio of actual transpiration to potential transpiration (Ta/Tp ratio), which decreases as water stress on crops increases, varies from 0.81 to 0.89 with combinations of adaptation scenarios and projected climate, while all simulations based on the current management resulted in almost the same Ta/Tp ratio, 0.86. These facts indicate that the effects of changes in water management are much greater than the direct effects of climate change with regard to water balance and agricultural production in the LSIP.

Keywords

Climate change IMPAM Irrigation management simulation model Performance assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan carried out this study under ICCAP and RR2002, which were financially supported. We would like to express our gratitude to the Water Users’ Association of the Lower Seyhan Irrigation Project, which kindly provided valuable data for simulations.

The main components and modules of IMPAM were developed in Subject 6 of the Research Revolution 2002 (RR2002) “Development of Water Resource Prediction Models,” funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. This is a contribution from the ICCAP Project (Impact of Climate Changes on Agricultural Production in Arid Areas) promoted by the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN) and the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK). This research was financially supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid no. 16380164. Data for spatial distribution of crop types were provided by Dr. Suha Berberoglu at Çukurova University.

References

  1. Abe-Ouchi A, Yamanaka Y, Kimoto M (1996) Outline of coupled atmosphere and ocean model and experiment. Internal report, Centre for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Bakri J, Suleiman A, Abdulla F, Ayad J (2010) Potential impact of climate change on rainfed agriculture of a semi-arid basin in Jordan. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 36(5–6):125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Çetin M, Diker K (2003) Assessing drainage problem areas by GIS: A case study in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Irrigation and Drainage Journal 54(2):343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feddes RA, Kowalik PJ, Zaradny H (1978) Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Simulation Monographs. Pudoc. Wageningen.Google Scholar
  5. Fujihara Y, Tanaka K, Watanabe T, Kojiri T (2007) Assessing Impact of Climate Change on the Water Resources of the Seyhan River Basin, Turkey, Final Report of the ICCAP, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  6. Fujihara Y, Tanaka K, Watanabe T, Naganoa T, Kojiri T (2008) Assessing the impacts of climate change on the water resources of the Seyhan River Basin in Turkey: Use of dynamically downscaled data for hydrologic simulations. Journal of Hydrology 353:33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoshikawa K, Kume T, Watanabe T, Nagano T (2005) A model for assessing the performance of irrigation management systems and studying regional water balances in arid zones. Proceedings of the 19th Congress of International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  8. IPCC working group 1 (2014) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/ (8 September 2017).
  9. IPCC working group 2 (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability; at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/ (8 September 2017).
  10. Kimura F, Kitoh A (2007) Downscaling by Pseudo Warming Method, Final Report of the ICCAP, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  11. Kume T, Nagano T, Akca A, Donma S, Hoshikawa K, Berberoglu S, Serdem M, Kapur S and Watanabe T (2007) Impact of the Irrigation Water Use on the Groundwater Environment and the Soil Salinity, The final report of ICCAP, The research project on the impact of climate changes on agricultural productions system in Arid Areas (ICCAP), March 2007, RIHN-TUBITAK, ISBN: 4-902325-09-8.Google Scholar
  12. Mary PA, William WW, Randall JH (2015) Applied Groundwater Modeling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nagano T, Donma S, Önder S, Özekici B (2005) Water use efficiency of the selected tertiary canals in the Lower Seyhan Irrigation Project Area. Progress Report of the ICCAP, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  14. Nagano T, Hoshikawa K, Onishi T, Kume T, Watanbe T (2009) Long-term changes in water and salinity management in Lower Seyhan Plain, Turkey. In Taniguchi M, Burnttt WC, Fukushima Y, Haigh M, Umezawa Y (eds) From Headwaters to the Ocean: Hydrological Changes and Watershed Management. London: Taylor and Francis, 313–320.Google Scholar
  15. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett VR, Codignotto JO, Hay JE, McLean RF, Ragoonaden S, Woodroffe CD (2007) Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In Parry M, Canziani OF (eds) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate Change 2007 – Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–356.Google Scholar
  17. Şener S (1986) Development of drainage in Turkey over the last 25 years and its prospects for the future. Proceedings of 25th International Course on Land Drainage (ICLD), 236–246.Google Scholar
  18. Selek B, Tunçok IK (2013) Effects of climate change on surface water management of Seyhan basin, Turkey. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 21:391–409.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-013-0260-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Umetsu C, Palanisami, Coşkun Z, Donma S, Nagao T, Fujihara Y, Tanaka K (2007) Climate Change and Alternative Cropping Patterns in Lower Seyhan Irrigation Project: A Regional Simulation Analysis, Final Report of the ICCAP, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  20. Van Dam JC, Huygen J, Wesseling JG, Feddes RA, Kabat P, VanWalsum PEV, Groenendijk P, Van Diepen CA (1997) Theory of SWAP version 2.0. Wageningen Agricultural University and DLO Winand Staring Centre. Technical Document 45.Google Scholar
  21. Yukimoto S, Endoh M, Kitamura Y, Kitoh A, Motoi T, Noda A (2000) ENSO-like interdecadal variability in the Pacific Ocean as simulated in a coupled general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research 105, 13, 945-13, 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keisuke Hoshikawa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Takanori Nagano
    • 2
  • Takashi Kume
    • 3
  • Tsugihiro Watanabe
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringToyama Prefectural UniversityImizuJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Agricultural ScienceKobe UniversityNadakuJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Rural EngineeringEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan
  4. 4.Regional Planning, Graduate School of Global Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversitySakyo-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations