Advertisement

Contending Internationalisms: Times, Spaces, Frames

  • Yonn Dierwechter
Chapter
Part of the Cities and the Global Politics of the Environment book series (CGPEP)

Abstract

This chapter engages with recent work on the histories and geographies of “internationalism,” tracing the story back to the early nineteenth century. While the internationalism of nations—of governing the world through a state-created framework—forms an important development of the older Westphalian order mentioned in Chapter  1, this chapter also draws attention to other outlooks and practices, including what Mark Mazower (Governing the world: The history of an idea, 1815 to the present. The Penguin Press, New York, 2012) calls diverse “brotherhoods” around free market ideals, evangelical moralism, anti-slavery campaigns, legal codification, and scientific knowledge as well as to what geographers have similarly charted as the heterogeneity of subaltern movements that challenge hegemonic forms of power and oppression (Featherstone, in Solidarity: Hidden histories and geographies of internationalism. Zed Books, London, New York, 2012; Political Geography, 49: 7–16, 2015; Ferretti, in Political Geography, 63: 10–19, 2018). Resisting the periodization of time, the chapter suggests that both Westphalian and post-Westphalian (or perhaps counter-Westphalian) forms of internationalism have long co-shaped global politics—and are therefore likely to do so in the future as cities gain even more clout. This ultimately requires us to reframe global political narratives that erase non-state spatialities and forms of agency, whether past, present, or future (Herod in Social Science History 27: 501–523, 2004).

Keywords

Internationalism Scale Space (Neo)Liberal order Rise of cities 

References

  1. Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4177090.
  2. Agnew, J. (2000). Global political geography beyond geopolitics. International Studies Review, 2(1), 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amen, M., Toly, N., McCarney, P., & Segbers, K. (Eds.). (2012). Cities and global governance: New sites for international relations. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined communities : Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Antentas, J. (2015). Sliding scale of spaces and dilemmas of internationalism. Antipode, 47(5), 1101–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antentas, J. (2016). Daniel Bensaïd, Melancholic strategist. Historical Materialism, 24(4), 51–106.  https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-12341500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Attwell, W. (2014). The rise of cities as global actors: What consequences for policy? Global Policy, 5(3), 374–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barchiesi, F. (2001). Transnational capital, urban globalisation and cross-border solidarity: The case of the South African municipal workers. In P. Waterman & J. Wills (Eds.), Place, space and the new labour internationalisms. Oxford, UK; Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Bodoni, C. (2013, February 12). A crisis of the state? The end of the postWestphalian model. Retrieved from http://www.socialeurope.eu/author/carlo-bordoni/.
  11. Bond, P. (2000). Elite transition: From apartheid to neoliberalism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4177507.
  13. Brenner, N. (2014). Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  14. Brennetot, A. (2015). The geographical and ethical origins of neoliberalism: The Walter Lippmann Colloquium and the foundations of a new geopolitical order. Political Geography, 49, 30–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooks, C. (2015). The apostle of internationalism: Stephen Duggan and the geopolitics of international education. Political Geography, 49, 64–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burke, R. (2017). The internationalism of human rights. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Calder, K., & Freytas, M. (2009). Global political cities as actors in twenty-first century international affairs. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(2), 79.Google Scholar
  18. Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., & Routledge, P. (2013). Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the commons, and solidarity. Antipode, 45(3), 602–620.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01025.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clapp, J., & Dauvergne, P. (2008). Paths to a green world: The political economy of the global environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Clavel, P. (1986). The progressive city. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Clavin, P. (2017). Men and markets: Global capital and the international economy. In G. Sluga & P. Clavel (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Curtis, S. (Ed.). (2014). The power of cities in international relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Curtis, S. (2016). Cities and global governance: State failure or a new global order? Millennium, 44(3), 455–477.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816637233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (2002). A tale of three cities: Or the globalization of city management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Didier, S., Morange, M., & Peyroux, E. (2013). The adaptative nature of neoliberalism at the local scale: Fifteen years of city improvement districts in Cape Town and Johannesburg. Antipode, 45(1), 121–139.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00987.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dierwechter, Y. (2017). Urban sustainability through smart growth: Greater Seattle, intercurrence, and the new geography of regional development. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dilworth, R. (Ed.). (2009). The city in American political development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Engelke, P. (2013). Foreign policy for an urban world: Global governance and the rise of cities. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council.Google Scholar
  29. Featherstone, D. (2012). Solidarity: Hidden histories and geographies of internationalism. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  30. Featherstone, D. (2015). Maritime labour and subaltern geographies of internationalism: Black internationalist seafarers’ organising in the interwar period. Political Geography, 49, 7–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferretti, F. (2018). Geographies of internationalism: Radical development and critical geopolitics from the Northeast of Brazil. Political Geography, 63, 10–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Forman, M. (1998). Nationalism and the international labor movement: The idea of the nation in socialist and anarchist theory. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Frankowski, P. (2010). One world-many orders? In S. Krishna-Hensel (Ed.), Order and disorder in the international system. Farnham: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  34. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.Google Scholar
  35. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Fukuyama, F. (2013). Political order and political decay. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.Google Scholar
  37. George, S. (1999). A short history of neoliberalism: Twenty years of elite economics and emerging opportunities for structural change. Paper presented at the Conference on Economic Sovereignty in a Globalizing World, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  38. Glassman, J. (2009). Critical geography I: The question of internationalism. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 685–692.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508101602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gunder, M. (2010). Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory, 9(4), 298–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Halperin, M. (1974). Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  42. Hardt, H., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hayman, P., & Williams, J. (2006). Westphalian sovereignty: Rights, intervention, meaning and context. Global Society, 20(4), 521–541.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820600929879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herod, A. (2004). Geographies of labor internationalism. Social Science History, 27(4), 501–523.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0145553200012669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Herrschel, T. (2013). Cities, state and globalisation. City-regional governance in Europe and North America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Herrschel, T., & Newman, P. (2017). Cities as international actors: Urban and regional governance beyond the nation state. London and New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hodder, J., Legg, S., & Heffernan, M. (2015). Introduction: Historical geographies of internationalism, 1900–1950. Political Geography, 49, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hodos, J. (2009). Against expectionalism: Intercurrence and intergovernmental relations in Britain and the United States. In R. Dilworth (Ed.), The city in American political development (pp. 44–63). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Imlay, T. (2017). Socialist internationalism after 1914. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history (pp. 213–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Iriye, A. (2017). Forward. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Jonas, A. (2012). City-regionalism as a contingent ‘geopolitics of capitalism’. Geopolitics, 18(2), 284–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jonas, A. (2015, October 8–9). Variegated city regionalisms: The geopolitics of city-region building. Paper presented at the Smart City-Regional Governance, Cosmopolis, Centre for Urban Policy Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels.Google Scholar
  53. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158–165.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krishna-Hensel, S. (2010). Order and disorder in the international system. Farnham: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  55. Lefebvre, H. (2013). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time, and everyday life. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  56. Lipsett, S., & Marks, G. (2000). It didn’t happen here: Why socialism failed in the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  57. Lucas, J. (2015). Urban governance and the American political development approach. Urban Affairs Review.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415620054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Maher, N. (2008). Nature’s new deal. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mathews, J. T. (1997). Power shift. (changing role of central government). Foreign Affairs, 76(1), 50.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20047909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mazower, M. (2012). Governing the world: The history of an idea, 1815 to the present. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  61. Merrifield, A. (2013). The urban question under planetary urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 909–922.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01189.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miller, D. L. (1989). Lewis Mumford, a life. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  63. Moisio, S. (2018). Urbanizing the nation-state? Notes on the geopolitical growth of cities and city-regions. Urban Geography, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1454685.
  64. Monbiot, G. (2000). Captive state: The corporate takeover of Britain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Morgan, K. (2007). The polycentric state: New spaces of empowerment and engagement? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1237–1251.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Newman, E. (2009). Failed states and international order: Constructing a post-Westphalian world. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(3), 421–443.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260903326479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Noortmann, M., Reinisch, A., & Ryngaert, C. (2015). Non-state actors in international law. Oxford; Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1996). Institutions and intercurrence: Theory building in the fullness of time. Nomos XXXVII, Political Order, 38, 111–146.Google Scholar
  69. Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The search for American political development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peck, J. (2008). Remaking laissez-faire. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 3–43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507084816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pred, A. (1977). The choreography of existence: Comments on Hagerstrand’s time-geography and its usefulness. Economic Geography, 53, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Ruffin, F. (2013). Municipal international relations: The South African case of metropolitan eThekwini. Loyola Journal of Social Sciences, XXVII(1), 119–141.Google Scholar
  74. Sarkar, J. (2015). Debating a post-Westphalian international order. Mainstream Weekly, LIII(15).Google Scholar
  75. Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Schroeder, H., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Global cities and the governance of climate change: What is the role of law in cities. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 314–360.Google Scholar
  77. Scott, A. (2001). Globalization and the rise of city regions. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 813–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Seabrooke, L. (2002). Bringing legitimacy back in to neo-Weberian state theory and international relations (Working Paper No. 6). Department of International Relations. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  79. Sellers, J. M. (2002). Governing from below: Urban regions and the global economy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). The real new world order. Foreign Affairs, Sept/Oct, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sluga, G., & Clavin, P. (2017a). Rethinking the history of internationalism. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth century history (pp. 3–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Sluga, G., & Clavin, P. (Eds.). (2017b). Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sowell, T. (1998). Conquests and cultures: An international history (1st ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  85. Steffek, J. (2015). Fascist internationalism. Millennium, 44(1), 3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815581870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Steger, M. (2002). Globalism. Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  87. Stone, C., & Whelan, R. (2009). Through the glass darkly: The once and future study of urban politics. In R. Dilworth (Ed.), The city in American political development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Swenson, P. (2002). Capitalists against markets: The making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Taylor, P. J. (2005). New political geographies: Global civil society and global governance through world city networks. Political Geography, 24(6), 703–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thrift, N., & Amin, A. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  91. Toly, N. (2017). The new urban agenda and the limits of cities. The Hedgehog Review, 19(2), 36–44.Google Scholar
  92. Walker, R. (2015). Building a better theory of the urban: A response to ‘Towards a new epistemology of the urban?’ City, 19(2–3), 183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1024073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Waterman, P., & Wills, J. (2001). Place, space and the new labour internationalisms. Oxford, UK; Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  94. Waterman, P., & Wills, J. (2012). Place, space and the new labor internationalisms: Beyond the fragments? In P. Waterman & J. Wills (Eds.), Place, space and the new labour internationalisms. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yonn Dierwechter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Washington TacomaTacomaUSA

Personalised recommendations