Advertisement

Technical Architecture to Deepen Our Solar System Awareness

  • Peter VerešEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Space and Society book series (SPSO)

Abstract

This chapter deals with individual assets involved in discovery of NEOs. Past, current and future surveys are described, with their diverse technical architectures and objectives. In addition to the ground-based telescopes that deliver the most discoveries, past, current and future space-based missions are presented. Current limits for discovery are defined by the aperture size of the telescope and the observing geometry and viewing angle of a telescope, with the Earth representing an obstruction that avoids looking closer to the Sun. The smallest NEOs are still discovered only incidentally; ground-based telescopes cannot reach asteroids with orbits mostly inside the Earth’s orbit. Long periodic comets remain a low-level threat. Discovery and follow-up have migrated from manual efforts and individual observers toward an automated regime and large dedicated discovery surveys, supported by software development and automated processing of large data.

Keywords

NEO surveys NEO discovery CCD 

References

  1. Denneau, Larry, Robert Jedicke, Tommy Grav, Mikael Granvik, Jeremy Kubica, Andrea Milani, Peter Vereš, et al. 2013. “The Pan-STARRS Moving Object Processing System.” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125 (926): 357–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/670337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hodapp, Klaus W., Walter A. Siegmund, Nicholas Kaiser, Kenneth C. Chambers, Uwe Laux, Jeff Morgan, and Ed Mannery. 2004. “Optical Design of the Pan-STARRS Telescopes.” In Ground-Based Telescopes, edited by Jacobus M. Oschmann, Jr., 5489:667. \procspie. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.550179.
  3. Jones, R. Lynne, Mario Jurić, and Željko Ivezić. 2015. “Asteroid Discovery and Characterization with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.” Edited by S.~R. Chesley, A Morbidelli, R Jedicke, and D Farnocchia. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, IAU Symposium, 10 (S318): 282–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921315008510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Koehn, B. W., and E Bowell. 1999. “Enhancing the Lowell Observatory Near-Earth-Object Search.” In Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 31:1091. \baas.Google Scholar
  5. Larson, S, E Beshore, R Hill, E Christensen, D McLean, S Kolar, R McNaught, and G Garradd. 2003. “The CSS and SSS NEO Surveys.” In AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting, Session 36. Asteroid Dynamics II, 35:982. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society.Google Scholar
  6. Law, Nicholas M., Shrinivas R. Kulkarni, Richard G. Dekany, Eran O. Ofek, Robert M. Quimby, Peter E. Nugent, Jason Surace, et al. 2009. “The Palomar Transient Factory: System Overview, Performance, and First Results.” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 121 (886): 1395–1408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/648598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Magnier, E, Nick Kaiser, and Ken Chambers. 2006. “The Pan-STARRS PS1 Image Processing Pipeline.” In The Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, E50.Google Scholar
  8. Mainzer, A, T Grav, J Bauer, J Masiero, R. S. McMillan, R. M. Cutri, R Walker, et al. 2011. “Neowise Observations Of Near-Earth Objects: Preliminary Results.” The Astrophysical Journal 743 (2): 156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McMillan, R. S., and Spacewatch Team. 2006. “Spacewatch Preparations for the Era of Deep All-Sky Surveys.” In AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #38, 38:592. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society.Google Scholar
  10. Nugent, C. R., A. Mainzer, J. Masiero, J. Bauer, R. M. Cutri, T. Grav, E. Kramer, S. Sonnett, R. Stevenson, and E. L. Wright. 2015. “NEOWISE Reactivation Mission Year One: Preliminary Asteroid Diameters and Albedos.” The Astrophysical Journal 814 (2): id.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pravdo, Steven H., David L. Rabinowitz, Eleanor F. Helin, Kenneth J. Lawrence, Raymond J. Bambery, Christopher C. Clark, Steven L. Groom, et al. 1999. “The Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) Program: An Automated System for Telescope Control, Wide-Field Imaging, and Object Detection.” The Astronomical Journal 117 (3): 1616–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/300769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith, Roger M., Richard G. Dekany, Christopher Bebek, Eric Bellm, Khanh Bui, John Cromer, Paul Gardner, et al. 2014. “The Zwicky Transient Facility Observing System.” In Ground-Based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, edited by Suzanne K. Ramsay, Ian S. McLean, and Hideki Takami, 9147:914779. \procspie. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2070014.
  13. Stokes, Grant. 2000. “Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Program (LINEAR).” Icarus 148 (1): 21–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2000.6493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vereš, Peter, and Steven R. Chesley. 2017. “Near-Earth Object Orbit Linking with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.” The Astronomical Journal 154 (1): 13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aa73d0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wright, Edward L., Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, A Mainzer, Michael E. Ressler, Roc M. Cutri, Thomas Jarrett, J. Davy Kirkpatrick, et al. 2010. “The Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (Wise): Mission Description And Initial On-Orbit Performance.” The Astronomical Journal 140 (6): 1868–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard-Smithsonian Center for AstrophysicsCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations