Advertisement

New Enemy, Old Pact? Past Defense Pacts and Future Planetary Defense Treaty

  • Tomáš BrunerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Space and Society book series (SPSO)

Abstract

This chapter draws a parallel between past defense pacts and a possible future planetary defense treaty regulating NEO deflection. Drafting a planetary defense treaty is compared to creating a defense pact. The data concerning the defense pacts offer insights in regard to the following questions: firstly, when it is the right time to establish legal framework for international cooperation; secondly, how to ensure that all the participating nations will contribute the same efforts and resources to the common defense project; thirdly, how the decision making should be regulated; and fourthly, how to safeguard that the outcomes of the project, e.g. in the form of advanced military technology, shall not be misused for the benefit of leading nation(s) and for the detriment of others. The chapter quantitatively investigates selected defense pacts concluded among nations between 1815 and 2003 and qualitatively examines five current defense pacts. It first evaluates the correlation between threat proximity and pact conclusion. The chapter then inquires what the actual wording of five current pacts is, i.e. whether it intends to prescribe same contributions of participants (freeriding prevention), whether it prohibits misusing the cooperation (abuse prevention) and how it regulates common capabilities development and decision-making.

Keywords

Earth Defense Treaty International law Asteroid Outer space Defense pacts Comparison 

References

  1. Adler, E. (1997). Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26(2), 249–277.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298970260021101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billings, L. (2006). To the Moon, Mars, and Beyond: Culture, Law, and Ethics in Space-Faring Societies. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(5), 430–437. : https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467606292504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, A. (2015). Security cosmopolitanism: the next phase. Critical Studies on Security, 3(2), 190–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1065109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Divine, R. (1993). The Sputnik Challenge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, J. (2015). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Hynek, N., & Stritecky, V. (2010). The rise and fall of the Third Site of Ballistic Missile Defense. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(2), 179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, J. C., & Leeds, B. A. (2011). Defense pacts: A prescription for peace? Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(1), 45–65.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00122.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knox, J. S. (1998). Planetary Defense: Legacy for a Certain Future. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA397269
  9. Kunich, J. C. J. C. (1997). Planetary Defense: The Legality of Global Survival. The Air Force Law Review, 41(41), 119–162. http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/airfor41&section=6
  10. Lachs, M. (2010). The Law of Outer Space: An Experience in Contemporary Law-Making. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Leeds, B., Ritter, J., Mitchell, S., & Long, A. (2002). Alliance treaty obligations and provisions, 1815-1944. International Interactions, 28(3), 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pashakhanlou, A. H. (2017). Realism and Fear in International Relations. Morgenthau, Waltz and Mearsheimer Reconsidered. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Peterson, M. J. (1997). The use of analogies in developing outer space law. International Organization, 51(2), 245–274.  https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Remo, J. L. (2015). The dilemma of nuclear energy in space. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(3), 38–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215581359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Remo, J. L., & Haubold, H. J. (2014). Threats from space: 20 Years of progress. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 70(4), 85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340214539125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosas, A. (1983). The Militarization of Space and International Law. Journal of Peace Research, 20(4), 357–364.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338302000406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, W. (2004). Earth-Moon Defense Management. In 2004 Planetary Defense Conference: Protecting Earth from Asteroids. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-1422
  18. Tannenwald, N. (2004). Law Versus Power on the High Frontier: The Case for a Rule-Based Regime for Outer Space. Yale J. Int’l L., 29, 363–422.Google Scholar
  19. Thangavelu, M., Wilson, T., Hussein, A., Aliaj, B., Entrena, C., Lee, C., et al. (2015). READI - Roadmap of Earth Defense Initiatives. Athens (OH). https://isulibrary.isunet.edu/opac/doc_num.php?explnum_id=722
  20. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Zaitsev, A. V. (2011). Defense against Asteroid-Comet Nucleus Dangers – A Real Task of Today. In R. Ragaini (Ed.), International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies. 43rd Session. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations