The Conundrum of Commercial Space

  • Carlos Manuel Entrena UtrillaEmail author
Part of the Space and Society book series (SPSO)


Commercialization is probably one of the most commonly heard words in the space industry. The topic is cause for one of the largest divisions in the industry, between the proposers of commerce, who often pose it as the only realistic approach, and the defenders of the traditional governmental approach, who see commerce as a utopian model that will never become a reality in space. Several commercialization attempts in the past failed to yield a fully commercial space sector (i.e. funded fully by private individuals). However, the various flaws of the various government space programs worldwide make a good case for the development of a commercially sustained space sector, especially for the development of large projects such as the MMB. Recent approaches to commercialization through private-public partnerships have shown promising results and could be imitated for the MMB. This chapter reviews past efforts towards commercialization and their main issues, and proposes how to solve them based on current experience with public-private partnerships.


Space development Space commercialization Cislunar economy Public-private partnerships 


  1. Allen-Ebrahimian, B. How SpaceX Launched a Chinese Experiment Into Space, Despite U.S. Ban., Foreign Policy (2017).Google Scholar
  2. Berger, E. (2017, January). Technical troubles likely to delay commercial crew flights until 2019. Ars Technica.Google Scholar
  3. China’s Space Activities in 2016. (2016). Beijing.Google Scholar
  4. Costello, K. (2017, January). Optical Fiber Production in Microgravity (Made In Space Fiber Optics).Google Scholar
  5. de Lama, G. (1986, August). Commercial Use Of Shuttle Draws Fire. The Chicago Tribune.Google Scholar
  6. Launius, R. D. (2012). Planning the post-Apollo space program: Are there lessons for the present? Space Policy, 28(1), 38–44. Scholar
  7. NanoRacks, Boeing to Build First Commercial ISS Airlock Module. (2017, February).
  8. Nonreimbursable Space Act Agreement between NanoRacks LLC and NASA for Operation of the NanoRacks System aboard the International Space Station National Laboratory. (2009, September).Google Scholar
  9. Pike, J. (n.d.). EELV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle.
  10. Portree, D. S. F. (2012, August). Before the Fire: Saturn-Apollo Applications (1966). WIRED.Google Scholar
  11. Portree, D. S. F. (2013, November). Moonbase Apollo (1968). WIRED.Google Scholar
  12. Shear, E. Bigelow Aerospace B330 space hab to get ride on ULA Atlas V 552 in 2020. , SpaceFlight Insider (2016).Google Scholar
  13. Simberg, R. (2013). Safe is not an Option. Jackson, Wyoming: Interglobal Media LLC.Google Scholar
  14. Space Shuttle Missions Summary (No. NASA/TM–2011–216142). (2011).Google Scholar
  15. Spudis, P. (2012, July). The Tale of Falcon 1. Air and Space Magazine.Google Scholar
  16. Utrilla, C. M.E. (2017). Asteroid-COTS: Developing the cislunar economy with private-public partnerships. Space Policy, 3940, 14–19. Scholar
  17. Winkler, R., & Pasztor, A. (2017, January). Exclusive Peek at SpaceX Data Shows Loss in 2015, Heavy Expectations for Nascent Internet Service. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  18. Zimmerman, R. (2003). Leaving earth: space stations, rival superpowers, and the quest for interplanetary travel. Washington, D.C: J. Henry Press.Google Scholar
  19. Zuniga, A. F., Rasky, D., & Pittman, R. B. (2015). Lunar COTS: An Economical and Sustainable Approach to Reaching Mars. AIAA Space 2015 Conference and Exposition, 1–24.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ResearcherMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations