Advertisement

A Holistic Approach for Soundness Verification of Decision-Aware Process Models

  • Massimiliano de Leoni
  • Paolo FelliEmail author
  • Marco Montali
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11157)

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed an increasing transformation in the design, engineering, and mining of processes, moving from a pure control-flow perspective to more integrated models where also data and decisions are explicitly considered. This calls for methods and techniques able to ascertain the correctness of such integrated models. Differently from previous approaches, which mainly focused on the local interplay between decisions and their corresponding outgoing branches, we introduce a holistic approach to verify the end-to-end soundness of a Petri net-based process model, enriched with case data and decisions. In addition, we present an effective, implemented technique that verifies soundness by translating the input net into a colored Petri net with bounded color sets, on which standard state space analysis techniques are subsequently applied. Experiments on real life illustrate the relevance and applicability in real settings.

References

  1. 1.
    Decision model and notation (DMN) v1.1 (2016). http://www.omg.org/spec/DMN/1.1/
  2. 2.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The application of petri nets to workflow management. J. Circ. Syst. Comput. 8(1), 21–66 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batoulis, K., Haarmann, S., Weske, M.: Various notions of soundness for decision-aware business processes. In: Mayr, H.C., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2017. LNCS, vol. 10650, pp. 403–418. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batoulis, K., Weske, M.: Soundness of decision-aware business processes. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 297, pp. 106–124. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65015-9_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Montali, M.: Foundations of data aware process analysis: a database theory perspective. In: Proceedings of PODS 2013. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calvanese, D., Dumas, M., Laurson, Ü., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Teinemaa, I.: Semantics and analysis of DMN decision tables. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9850, pp. 217–233. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Long, D.E.: Model checking and abstraction. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 16(5), 1512–1542 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Leoni, M., Felli, P., Montali, M.: A holistic approach for soundness verification of decision-aware process models. CoRR Technical report arXiv:1804.02316, arXiv.org e-Print archive (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02316
  9. 9.
    Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jensen, K., Kristensen, L.M.: Coloured Petri Nets: Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalenkova, A.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Lomazova, I.A., Rubin, V.A.: Process mining using BPMN: relating event logs and process models. Softw. Syst. Model. 16(4), 1019–1048 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knuplesch, D., Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Pfeifer, H., Dadam, P.: On enabling data-aware compliance checking of business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 332–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mannhardt, F.: Multi-perspective process mining. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (2018). https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/90463927
  14. 14.
    Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Decision mining revisited - discovering overlapping rules. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Montali, M., Calvanese, D.: Soundness of data-aware, case-centric processes. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 18(5), 535–558 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ratzer, A.V., et al.: CPN tools for editing, simulating, and analysing coloured petri nets. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Best, E. (eds.) ICATPN 2003. LNCS, vol. 2679, pp. 450–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44919-1_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sidorova, N., Stahl, C., Trčka, N.: Soundness verification for conceptual workflow nets with data: early detection of errors with the most precision possible. Inf. Syst. 36(7), 1026–1043 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimiliano de Leoni
    • 1
  • Paolo Felli
    • 2
    Email author
  • Marco Montali
    • 2
  1. 1.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Free University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations