Advertisement

The Retention Effect of Learning Grammatical Patterns Implicitly Using Joining-in-Type Robot-Assisted Language-Learning System

  • AlBara Khalifa
  • Tsuneo Kato
  • Seiichi Yamamoto
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11107)

Abstract

Conducting a multiparty conversation among two robots and a human learner for the purpose of language learning is a novel idea. It can help in conveying grammatical information to the human learner in an implicit manner. The main focus in this paper is the quantification of the level of retention of what was learned implicitly over a period of four weeks. We had evaluated the utterances of the human learners on the level of similarity of n-grams with a reference answer, and on the basis of grammatical correctness of use. The experiments revealed effect of repletion of implicit learning for learning corrective use of grammatical patterns.

Keywords

Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) Robot Assisted Language Learning (RALL) Implicit learning 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (No. 15K02738).

References

  1. 1.
    Pickering, M.J., Garrod, S.: Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27(2), 169–190 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reber, A.S.: Implicit learning of artificial grammars. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 77, 317–327 (1967)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fandrianto, A., Eskenazi, M.: Prosodic entrainment in an information-driven dialog system. In INTERSPEECH, pp. 342–345 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro, H.: Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19(1), 61–84 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee, S.: On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning. ReCALL 23(01), 25–58 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belpaeme, T., et al.: L2TOR-second language tutoring using social robots. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Educational Robots (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., Ghazisaedy, M.: Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. Int. J. Hum. Robot. 11(3), 4–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Long, M.H.: Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 379(1), 259–278 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bloom, B.S.: The 2 sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Res. 13(6), 4–16 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khalifa, A., Kato, T., Yamamoto, S.: Measuring effect of repetitive queries and implicit learning with joining-in type robot assisted language learning system. In: Proceedings of 7th ISCA Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education, pp. 13–17 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Science and EngineeringDoshisha UniversityKyotanabe-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations