Advertisement

Introduction: Welcome to the Neoliberal Life Cycle!

  • Beverley ClackEmail author
  • Michele Paule
Chapter

Abstract

To present an interdisciplinary collection with ‘neoliberal’ in the title is, in the twenty-first century academy, a risky business. The risk lies in the term’s ubiquity. Writers across social, cultural and economic fields seem to agree that the use of ‘neoliberal’ has become too lazy, too vague and too readily used to denounce (Peck in Territ, Polit, GovAnce 1: 132–157, 2013); too frequently undefined and unevenly employed (Boas and Gans-Morse in Stud Comp Int Dev 44, 2009); too ‘overblown’ and in need of being ‘severely circumscribed’ (Dean in Governmentality: Power and Rile in Modern Society, Sage, London 2014, p. 150). We have organised the essays in this collection around its banner precisely because of, rather than in spite of, this tendency to ubiquity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The papers in this volume came out of an interdisciplinary seminar series held at Oxford Brookes University 2014–2015, and an accompanying extended social media discussion. We are grateful to the contributors, from the research group at Brookes, and those that brought their papers and perspectives to the conversation from other institutions, professional fields, nations and continents. Thanks to Heather Mendick and Kate Reynolds and also to the University for supporting this project.

References

  1. BBC News. (2002). Blair’s University Targets Spelt Out. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/1789500.stm.
  2. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boas, T. C., & Gans-Morse, J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From New Liberal Philosophy to Anti-liberal Slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(2), 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, W. (2014). The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rile in Modern Society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Dean, M. (2014). Rethinking Neoliberalism. Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (2008). “The Birth of Biopolitics” Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978 (A. I. Davidson, Ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Frank, T. (2018). Striking Teachers Show That Cutting Education to Fix It Is a Neoliberal Myth. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/21/teacher-strikes-schools-neoliberal-fantasy-debunking.
  13. Fukuyama, F. (2012). The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2011). New Femininities: Post-feminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, S. (2011). The Neo-liberal Revolution. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, A. & Dobson, A. S. (2015). Theorizing Agency in Post-girlpower Times. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 29(2), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hillman, N. (2017). Higher Education and Apprenticeships: As Important as Each Other? In I. Anderson & B. Roback (Eds.), A New Blue Book: Big Ideas from the Centre-Right (pp. 65–76). https://www.newbluebook.com/blue-book.
  19. Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lemke, T. (2001). ‘The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-liberal Governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirowski, P. (2014). Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Oksala, J. (2013). Neoliberalism and Biopolitical Governmentality. In J. Nilsson & S.-O. Wallenstein (Eds.), Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality. Södertörn Philosophical Studies 14. Huddinge: Södertörn University. eprint: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:615362/FULLTEXT03.
  23. Peck, J. (2013). Explaining (with) Neoliberalism. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(2), 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Read, J. (2009). A Genealogy of Homo Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ringrose, J. (2012). Postfeminist Education? Girls and the Sexual Politics of Schooling. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robinson, N. J. (2018). How Neoliberalism Worms Its Way into Your Brain. https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/04/how-neoliberalism-worms-its-way-into-your-brain.
  27. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association.Google Scholar
  28. Rottenberg, C. (2013). The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism. Cultural Studies, 28(3), 418–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scharff, C. (2016). The Psychic Life of Neoliberalism: Mapping the Contours of Entrepreneurial Subjectivity. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(6), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2016). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  32. Standing, G. (2014). A Precariat Charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  33. The Independent. (2013). Something for the ‘Slackers’ to Focus On: A 2:1 Degree Is Worth Around £80k More to You Than a 2:2. Accessed from https://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/something-for-the-slackers-to-focus-on-a-21-degree-is-worth-around-80k-more-to-you-than-a-22-8764130.html.
  34. The Progressive. (2015). The New Spanish Inquisition. December 18. http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2015/12/18/the-new-spanish-inquisition/.
  35. Walker, R. (2014). The Shame of Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Humanities and Social ScienceOxford Brookes University, Harcourt Hill CampusOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations