Advertisement

Intact Connectional Morphometricity Learning Using Multi-view Morphological Brain Networks with Application to Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Alaa Bessadok
  • Islem Rekik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11083)

Abstract

The morphology of anatomical brain regions can be affected by neurological disorders, including dementia and schizophrenia, to various degrees. Hence, identifying the morphological signature of a specific brain disorder can improve diagnosis and better explain how neuroanatomical changes associate with function and cognition. To capture this signature, a landmark study introduced, brain morphometricity, a global metric defined as the proportion of phenotypic variation that can be explained by brain morphology derived from structural brain MRI scans. However, this metric is limited to investigating morphological changes using low-order measurements (e.g., regional volumes) and overlooks how these changes can be related to each other (i.e., how morphological changes in region A are influenced by changes in region B). Furthermore, it is derived from a pre-defined anatomical similarity matrix using a Gaussian function, which might not be robust to outliers and constrains the locality of data to a fixed bandwidth. To address these limitations, we propose the intact connectional brain morphometricity (ICBM), a metric that captures the variation of connectional changes in brain morphology. In particular, we use multi-view morphological brain networks estimated from multiple cortical attributes (e.g., cortical thickness) to learn an intact space that first integrates the morphological network views into a unified space. Next, we learn a multi-view morphological similarity matrix in the intact space by adaptively assigning neighbors for each data sample based on local connectivity. The learned similarity capturing the shared traits across morphological brain network views is then used to derive our ICBM via a linear mixed effect model. Our framework shows the potential of the proposed ICBM in capturing the connectional neuroanatomical signature of brain disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder.

References

  1. 1.
    Collin, G.: The connectomic blueprint of Schizophrenia. Ph.D thesis (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finn, E.S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M.D., Huang, J., Chun, M.M., Papademetris, X., Constable, R.T.: Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1664 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Imperiale, F., Agosta, F., Canu, E., Markovic, V., Inuggi, A., Jecmenica-Lukic, M., Tomic, A., Copetti, M., Basaia, S., Kostic, V.: Brain structural and functional signatures of impulsive-compulsive behaviours in Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 459 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sabuncu, M.R., et al.: Morphometricity as a measure of the neuroanatomical signature of a trait. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 113, E5749–E5756 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lisowska, A., Rekik, I., Initiative, A.D.N., et al.: Pairing-based ensemble classifier learning using convolutional brain multiplexes and multi-view brain networks for early dementia diagnosis. In: International Workshop on Connectomics in Neuroimaging, pp. 42–50 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lisowska, A., Rekik, I.: Joint pairing and structured mapping of convolutional brain morphological multiplexes for early dementia diagnosis. Brain connectivity (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soussia, M., Rekik, I.: High-order connectomic manifold learning for autistic brain state identification. In: International Workshop on Connectomics in Neuroimaging, pp. 51–59 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahjoub, I., Mahjoub, M.A., Rekik, I.: Brain multiplexes reveal morphological connectional biomarkers fingerprinting late brain dementia states. Sci. Rep. 8, 4103 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, B., Zhu, J., Pierson, E., Ramazzotti, D., Batzoglou, S.: Visualization and analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning. Nature 70, 869–79 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu, C., Tao, D., Xu, C.: Multi-view intact space learning. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37, 2531–2544 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harville, D.A.: Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 72, 320–338 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BASIRA Lab, CVIP Group, School of Science and Engineering, ComputingUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
  2. 2.National Engineering School of GabesGabesTunisia

Personalised recommendations