Advertisement

Towards Effective Functional Connectome Fingerprinting

  • Kendrick Li
  • Gowtham Atluri
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11083)

Abstract

The ability to uniquely characterize individual subjects based on their functional connectome (FC) is a key requirement for progress towards precision neuroscience. The recent availability of dense scans from individuals has enabled the neuroscience community to investigate the possibility of individual characterization. FC fingerprinting is a new and emerging problem where the goal is to uniquely characterize individual subjects based on FC. Recent studies reported near 100% accuracy suggesting that unique characterization of individuals is an accomplished task. However, there are multiple key aspects of the problem that are yet to be investigated. Specifically, (i) the impact of the number of subjects on fingerprinting performance needs to be studied, (ii) the impact of granularity of parcellation used to construct FC needs to be quantified, (iii) approaches to separate subject-specific information from generic information in the FC are yet to be explored. In this study, we investigated these three directions using publicly available resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the Human Connectome Project. Our results suggest that fingerprinting performance deteriorates with increase in the number of subjects and with the decrease in the granularity of parcellation. We also found that FC profiles of a small number of regions at high granularity capture subject-specific information needed for effective fingerprinting.

Keywords

Functional connectivity Fingerprinting Parcellation Precision neuroscience 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Amico, E., Goñi, J.: The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 8254 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atluri, G., et al.: The brain-network paradigm: using functional imaging data to study how the brain works. IEEE Computer 49(10), 65–71 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandettini, P.A.: Twenty years of functional MRI: the science and the stories. Neuroimage 62(2), 575–588 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finn, E.S., et al.: Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 18(11), 1664 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gordon, E.M., et al.: Precision functional mapping of individual human brains. Neuron 95(4), 791–807 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laumann, T.O., et al.: Functional system and areal organization of a highly sampled individual human brain. Neuron 87(3), 657–670 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miranda-Dominguez, O., et al.: Connectotyping: model based fingerprinting of the functional connectome. PloS one 9(11), e111048 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poldrack, R.A.: Precision neuroscience: dense sampling of individual brains. Neuron 95(4), 727–729 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shehzad, Z., et al.: The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. C.Cortex (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith, S.M.: Resting-state fMRI in the human connectome project. Neuroimage 80, 144–168 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tan, P.N., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V.: Introduction to Data Mining (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wig, G.S.: An approach for parcellating human cortical areas using resting-state correlations. Neuroimage 93, 276–291 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, T.: Assessing variations in areal organization for the intrinsic brain: from fingerprints to reliability. Cereb. Cortex 26(11), 4192–4211 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohio Supercomputer Center (1987). http://osc.edu/ark:/19495/f5s1ph73

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EECSUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations