Advertisement

Managing Complex Patient Journeys in Healthcare

  • Ragnhild Halvorsrud
  • Annette Lund Lillegaard
  • Mette Røhne
  • Andreas Momme Jensen
Chapter

Abstract

Healthcare services are increasingly being digitized for greater flexibility and efficient sharing of information. There is also increased awareness among healthcare providers that they must consider their services from the perspective of the patient. To offer a coherent patient journey and efficient treatment, healthcare providers need a structured overview of their service processes and how these affect the patient journey. This chapter introduces customer journey modeling language (CJML) to support the design, management, and analysis of complex patient journeys. Through two case studies, we describe how CJML has been utilized for a shared overview of patient journeys, improvement work, internal training, and knowledge sharing. The first case study was carried out with DIPS, a supplier of eHealth systems to Norwegian hospitals. Here, CJML was used to support the documentation and rollout of a new generation of tools for surgery planning, a complex and resource-intensive process during which critical information is exchanged over time among a range of actors. The second case study was conducted at Oslo University Hospital. Cross-functional teams used CJML to document the patient journey associated with cervical cancer as the basis for improvement work. The two case studies demonstrate how CJML supports healthcare service design through a common understanding of the patient journeys among stakeholders and by visualizing the workflows and actors involved. Although several weaknesses in CJML remain to be resolved, the case studies suggest the benefit of a model-based approach in two regards: first, as an effective communication tool to unite medical, technical, and administrative expertise and second to enhance the patient focus throughout the improvement and digitization of health services.

References

  1. Ash, J. S., Berg, M., & Coiera, E. (2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(2), 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausen, D., Austad, H. O., Svagård, I., Landmark, A. D., Tjønnås, M. S., Rohde, T, et al. (2017). Development and implementation of digital cooperation and support at KAD/Oslo Municipality (2017:00881). Oslo: SINTEF. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/sintef-teknologi-og-samfunn/prosjektwebber/velferdsteknologi/sluttrapport-samkad_sintef-2017-00881.pdf
  3. Bayliss, E. A., Edwards, A. E., Steiner, J. F., & Main, D. S. (2008). Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities. Family Practice, 25(4), 287–293.  https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759–769.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brattheim, B. J., Hellesø, R., & Melby, L. (2015). Planning for post-hospital care-local challenges to general benefits of e-messages: Hospital staff’s perspectives. In CEUR workshop proceedings (Vol. 1574, pp. 43–52).Google Scholar
  6. Bygstad, B., Hanseth, O., Siebenherz, A., & Øvrelid, E. (2017). Process innovation meets digital infrastructure in a high-tech hospital. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (pp. 801–814), 5–10 June 2017, Guimarães, Portugal.Google Scholar
  7. de Bruin, S. R., Versnel, N., Lemmens, L. C., Molema, C. C., Schellevis, F. G., Nijpels, G., et al. (2012). Comprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions: A systematic literature review. Health Policy, 107(2–3), 108–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EPA. (2018). Care pathways. European Pathway Association. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from http://e-p-a.org/care-pathways/
  9. France, D. J., Levin, S., Hemphill, R., Chen, K., Rickard, D., Makowski, R., et al. (2005). Emergency physicians’ behaviors and workload in the presence of an electronic whiteboard. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(10), 827–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halvorsrud, R., Haugstveit, I. M., & Pultier, A. (2016). Evaluation of a modelling language for customer journeys. In A. Blackwell, B. Plimmer, & G. Stapleton (Eds.), Proceedings from the 2016 I.E. Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 40–48), Cambridge, UK, 5–7 September 2016.Google Scholar
  11. Halvorsrud, R., Kvale, K., & Følstad, A. (2016). Improving service quality through customer journey analysis. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(6), 840–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hertzum, M., & Simonsen, J. (2013). Work-practice changes associated with an electronic emergency department whiteboard. Health Informatics Journal, 19(1), 46–60.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458212454024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haugstveit, I.M., Halvorsrud, R., & Karahasanovic, A. (2016). Supporting redesign of C2C services through customer journey mapping. In N. Morelli, A. de Götzen, & F. Grani (Eds.), ServDes. 2016 Service Design Geographies. Proceedings of the fifth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference (pp. 215–227). Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark, 24–26 May, 2016. Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kaplan, K. (2016). Journey mapping in real life: A survey of UX practitioners. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/journey-mapping-ux-practitioners/
  15. Løvlie, L., Polaine, A., & Reason, B. (2013). Service design: From insight to implementation. New York: Rosenfeld Media.Google Scholar
  16. Melby, L., Brattheim, B. J., & Helleso, R. (2015). Patients in transition: Improving hospital-home care collaboration through electronic messaging: Providers’ perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(23–24), 3389–3399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meld.St.9. (2012–2013). One citizen – one patient record. Digital services in the health and care sector. 11/2012. Report 9 (2012–2013) from Ministry of Health and Care Services (in Norwegian). Accessed October 18, 2018, from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld-st-9-20122013/id708609/
  18. Meld.St.47. (2008–2009). The coordination reform: Proper treatment – at the right place and right time. Report 47 (2008–2009) from Ministry of Health and Care Services. Accessed October 18, 2018, from https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/report.no.-47-to-the-storting-2008-2009/id567201/
  19. NDH. (2014). One citizenone journal. ICT challenges in the health care sector. Report Norwegian Directorate of Health. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/355890dd2872413b838066702dcdad88/ikt_utfordringsbilde_helse_omsorgssektoren.pdf
  20. NDH. (2016). Administration of patient journeys across treatment institutions. Report from Norwegian Directorate of Health (IS-2393), Version 1.0, 04/2016. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://ehelse.no/Documents/E-helsekunnskap/Administrasjon%20av%20pasientforløp%20på%20tvers%20av%20behandlingssteder_pdf
  21. NDH. (2018). National guidelines for patient pathway given by Norwegian Directorate of Health. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/rehabilitering-habilitering-individuell-plan-og-koordinator/seksjon?Tittel=pasientforlop-i-habilitering-og-6901
  22. NDeH. (Ed.). (2017). National eHealth strategy for 2017–2022. Norwegian Directorate of eHealth. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://ehelse.no/Documents/Nasjonal%20e-helsestrategi%20og%20handlingsplan/Nasjonal%20e-helsestrategi%202017-2022%20%28PDF%29.pdf
  23. OMG. (2011). Business process model and notation. In version 2.0: Object Management Group (OMG). Retrieved from https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/About-BPMN/
  24. Øvrelid, E., & Halvorsen, M. (2016). Improving patient flow through lightweight technology. In NOKOBIT, Norwegian Conference for Organizations’ Use of IT, 24(1). ISSN 1892-0748.Google Scholar
  25. Øvrelid, E., Sanner, T., & Siebenherz, A. (2017). From admission to discharge: Informating patient flow with “lightweight IT”. In NOKOBIT, Norwegian Conference for Organizations’ Use of IT, 25(1). ISSN 1892-0748.Google Scholar
  26. Scott, I. A., Shohag, H., & Ahmed, M. (2014). Quality of care factors associated with unplanned readmissions of older medical patients: A case-control study. Internal Medicine Journal, 44(2), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1963). Mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  28. Shostack, G. L. (1982). How to design a service. European Journal of Marketing, 16(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stickdorn, M., Schneider, J., Andrews, K., & Lawrence, A. (2011). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases (Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Svagård, I., Boysen, E. S., Fensli, R., & Vatnøy, T. (2016). Response center services in health care services: Needs and future scenarios (A27689). Oslo: SINTEF. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/sintef-teknologi-og-samfunn/prosjektwebber/velferdsteknologi/sintef-a27689.pdf
  31. Syal, R. (2013). Abandoned NHS IT system has cost £10bn so far. The Guardian. Accessed October 18, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/sep/18/nhsrecords-system-10bn
  32. Tax, S. S., McCutcheon, D., & Wilkinson, I. F. (2013). The service delivery network (SDN): A customer-centric perspective of the customer journey. Journal of Service Research, 16(4), 454–470.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513481108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vogeli, C., Shields, A. E., Lee, T. A., Gibson, T. B., Marder, W. D., Weiss, K. B., et al. (2007). Multiple chronic conditions: Prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 391–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ragnhild Halvorsrud
    • 1
  • Annette Lund Lillegaard
    • 2
  • Mette Røhne
    • 1
  • Andreas Momme Jensen
    • 3
  1. 1.SINTEF DigitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.DIPS ASBodøNorway
  3. 3.Sykehuspartner HFOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations