Advertisement

Physicians Beyond Patient Care

  • Matjaž Zwitter
Chapter

Abstract

The last chapter deals with a physician who is not directly involved in patient care. Some physicians will advance to a leading position, either within a healthcare system, in governmental structures or in pharmaceutical industry. Other situations include teaching responsibilities; the role of an expert in the court; medical reports for candidates for driving licenses or use of weapons; expert opinions on investments in medical equipment; and medical counselling in sports, especially those with strong commercial support. In all these situations, physicians are obliged to act honestly, in the best interests of the society as a whole. Numerous cases of misbehavior have been revealed; yet, it is hard to understand those of us who cross the line of professional integrity and beneficence. Whatever a physician is doing outside of his basic profession, honest behavior enables an eventual return to medical practice.

Keywords

Management Politics Expert opinions Teacher Sports medicine Physician as patient 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Ling H, Hardy J, Zetterberg H. Neurological consequences of traumatic brain injuries in sports. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015;66:114–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Purcell L, LeBlanc CM, American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness; Canadian Pediatric Society, Healthy Active Living and Sports Medicine Committee. Policy statement—boxing participation by children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;128:617–23.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White C. Mixed martial arts and boxing should be banned, says BMA. Br Med J. 2007;335:469.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosilj D, Cankar K. Physician as patient. Term paper for Dean’s award. Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, 2017.Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Almirall N. The ethics of engagement with the pharmaceutical industry. Mich Med. 2006;105(1):10–2. PMID: 16555742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Defining professionalism in medical education: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2014;36:47–61.  https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.850154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Braquehais MD, Tresidder A, DuPont RL. Service provision to physicians with mental health and addiction problems. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28:324–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Breitsameter C. How to justify a ban on doping? J Med Ethics. 2017;43:287–92.  https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins J. Professionalism and physician interactions with industry. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:325–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.01.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gould D. Gene doping: gene delivery for olympic victory. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76:292–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jawaid A, Rehman TU. Physician-pharmaceutical interaction: training the doctors of tomorrow. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007;57:380–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirschen MP, Tsou A, Nelson SB, Russell JA, Larriviere D, Ethics, Law, and Humanities Committee, a Joint Committee of the American Academy of Neurology, American Neurological Association, and Child Neurology Society. Legal and ethical implications in the evaluation and management of sports-related concussion. Neurology. 2014;83:352–8.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000613.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Leclerc S, Herrera CD. Sport medicine and the ethics of boxing. Br J Sports Med. 1999;33:426–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marco CA, Moskop JC, Solomon RC, Geiderman JM, Larkin GL. Gifts to physicians from the pharmaceutical industry: an ethical analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:513–21. Epub 2006 Feb 8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mintzker Y, Braunack-Mayer A, Rogers W. General practice ethics: continuing medical education and the pharmaceutical industry. Aust Fam Physician. 2015;44:846–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Myers MF, Gabbard GO. The physician as patient: a clinical handbook for mental health professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2008. ISBN-13: 978-1585623129.Google Scholar
  13. Negro M, Marzullo N, Caso F, Calanni L, D’Antona G. Opinion paper: scientific, philosophical and legal consideration of doping in sports. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118:729–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3821-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Reardon CL, Factor RM. Considerations in the use of stimulants in sport. Sports Med. 2016;46:611–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0456-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schetky DH. Conflicts of interest between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry and special interest groups. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2008;17:113–25, ix–x.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2007.07.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Trestman RL. Ethics, the law, and prisoners: protecting society, changing human behavior, and protecting human rights. J Bioeth Inq. 2014;11:311–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9560-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tucker AM. Conflicts of interest in sports medicine. Clin Sports Med. 2016;35:217–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2015.10.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matjaž Zwitter
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Institute of OncologyLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations