Advertisement

Genetics

  • Matjaž Zwitter
Chapter

Abstract

Three characteristics make testing for genetic abnormalities different from all other medical diagnostics: life-long validity for the tested person; implications for a broader circle of blood-related family members; and the possible emergence of genetic information that was not solicited but may nevertheless influence the life of the person and his/her family. For these reasons, professional counselling prior to testing is an essential requirement. In prenatal diagnostics, genetic testing is ethically acceptable for the elimination of embryos with genetically determined diseases, but not for selection regarding gender or personal characteristics. For children, testing for adult-onset diseases should not be performed, and genetic testing should be reserved for conditions for which an immediate intervention may benefit the child. Great caution and consent prior to testing are recommended in dealing with unsolicited information. Unsolicited information regarding paternity should not be communicated, with the exception of clear proof of incest involving a minor.

Keywords

The spectrum of genetic information Preimplantation genetic diagnostics Genetic testing in childhood Genetic counselling Accidental findings 

Suggested Reading

  1. Anderson JA, Hayeems RZ, Shuman C, Szego MJ, Monfared N, Bowdin S, et al. Predictive genetic testing for adult-onset disorders in minors: a critical analysis of the arguments for and against the 2013 ACMG guidelines. Clin Genet. 2015;87:301–10.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird S. Genetic testing: medico-legal issues. Aust Fam Physician. 2014;43:481–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boniolo G, Sanchini V. Ethical counselling and medical decision-making in the era of personalised medicine: a practice-oriented guide. Berlin: Springer; 2016. ISBN-13: 978-3319276885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS, Berkman BE, Bombard Y, Holm IA, et al. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:6–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chadwick R, Levitt M, Shickle D, editors. The right to know and the right not to know: genetic privacy and responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. ISBN-13: 978-1107076075.Google Scholar
  6. Chiò A, Battistini S, Calvo A, Caponnetto C, Conforti FL, Corbo M, et al. Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:478–85.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-305546.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke AJ, Wallgren-Pettersson C. Ethics in genetic counselling. J Community Genet. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0371-7.
  8. DeLisi LE. Ethical issues in the use of genetic testing of patients with schizophrenia and their families. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27:191–6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kornyo EA. A guide to bioethics (pocket guides to biomedical sciences). Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2017. ISBN: 9781138631984.Google Scholar
  10. Dheensa S, Fenwick A, Shkedi-Rafid S, Crawford G, Lucassen A. Health-care professionals’ responsibility to patients’ relatives in genetic medicine: a systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Genet Med. 2016;18:290–301.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall MJ, Forman AD, Pilarski R, Wiesner G, Giri VN. Gene panel testing for inherited cancer risk. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12:1339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindor NM, Thibodeau SN, Burke W. Whole-genome sequencing in healthy people. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:159–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Parker M. Ethical problems and genetics practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. ISBN-13: 978-1107697799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rafiq M, Ianuale C, Ricciardi W, Boccia S. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of european guidelines, recommendations, and position statements. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2015;19:535–47.  https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2015.0051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Surbone A. Ethical implications of genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Crit Rev. Oncol Hematol. 2001;40:149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Surbone A. Social and ethical implications of BRCA testing. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(Suppl 1):i60–6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Than NG, Papp Z. Ethical issues in genetic counseling. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;43:32–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.01.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vehmas S. Just ignore it? Parents and genetic information. Theor Med Bioeth. 2001;22:473–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matjaž Zwitter
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Institute of OncologyLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations