Advertisement

Drammar: A Comprehensive Ontological Resource on Drama

  • Vincenzo Lombardo
  • Rossana DamianoEmail author
  • Antonio Pizzo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11137)

Abstract

This paper reports about the release of a comprehensive ontological resource on drama, called Drammar. Drama is pervasive across cultures and is realized through disparate media items. Drammar has been designed with the goals to describe and encode the core dramatic qualities and to serve as a knowledge base underlying a number of applications. The impact of the resource is displayed through its direct application in a few tasks and its extension to serve in novel projects in the digital humanities.

Keywords

Drama Wiki Digital humanities 

References

  1. 1.
    Cinderella. animated movie produced by Walt Disney, distributed by RKO Radio Pictures Release (1950)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albert, G., Pizzo, A., Lombardo, V., Damiano, R., Terzulli, C.: Bringing authoritative models to computational drama (encoding knebel’s action analysis). In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 285–297. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, C., Fillmore, C., Lowe, J.: The berkeley framenet project. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1. pp. 86–90. Association for Computational Linguistics (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bazin, A., Gray, H.: What is Cinéma?: Essays Selected and Translated by Hugh Gray. University of California Press, Berkeley (1967)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciotti, F.: Toward a formal ontology for narrative. Matlit Revista do Programa de Doutoramento em Materialidades da Literatura 4(1), 29–44 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elson, D.K.: Dramabank: annotating agency in narrative discourse. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esslin, M.: The Field of Drama. Methuen, London (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferrario, R., Oltramari, A.: Towards a computational ontology of mind. In: Varzi, A.C., Vieu, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference FOIS 2004, Torino, Italy, pp. 287–297 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    François, A.R., Nevatia, R., Hobbs, J., Bolles, R.C.: VERL: an ontology framework for representing and annotating video events. IEEE MultiMed. 5, 76–86 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_18CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology design patterns. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 221–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hatcher, J.: The Art and Craft of Playwriting. Story Press, Cincinnati (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked data: Evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology, pp. 1–136 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jewell, M., et al.: OntoMedia: an ontology for the representation of heterogeneous media. In: Proceedings of SIGIR workshop on Mutlimedia Information Retrieval. ACM SIGIR (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kipper, K., Korhonen, A., Ryant, N., Palmer, M.: Extending VerbNet with novel verb classes. In: Proceedings of LREC, vol. 2006, p. 1 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lavandier, Y.: La dramaturgie. Le clown et l’enfant, Cergy (1994). http://www.clown-enfant.com/leclown/dramaturgie/
  19. 19.
    Lawrence, K.F.: Crowdsourcing linked data from shakespeare to Dr who. In: Web Science International Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lombardo, V., Battaglino, C., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R., Lieto, A.: Coupling conceptual modeling and rules for the annotation of dramatic media. Semant. Web J. 6(5), 503–534 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lombardo, V., Damiano, R., Pizzo, A., Terzulli, C.: The intangible nature of drama documents: an FRBR view. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 173–182. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lombardo, V., et al.: Annotation of metadata for dramatic texts: the POP-ODE initiative. In: NL4AI@AI*IA. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1983, pp. 30–42. CEUR-WS.org (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: Multimedia tool suite for the visualization of drama heritage metadata. Multimed. Tools Appl. 75(7), 3901–3932 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R.: Safeguarding and accessing drama as intangible cultural heritage. ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 9(1), 1–26 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R., Terzulli, C., Albert, G.: Interactive chart of story characters’ intentions. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 415–418. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mamet, D.: Three Uses of the Knife: On the Nature and Purpose of Drama. The Columbia Lectures on American Culture. Columbia University Press (1998). http://books.google.it/books?id=YZRODCVYACsC
  27. 27.
    McCarthy, J.C.: Mental situation calculus. In: Proceedings of the 1986 Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge. pp. 307–307. TARK 1986, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1986). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1029786.1029815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miller, G.: WordNet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mulholland, P., Collins, T.: Using digital narratives to support the collaborative learning and exploration of cultural heritage. In: 2002 Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 527–531. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norling, E., Sonenberg, L.: Creating Interactive Characters with BDI Agents. In: Proceedings of the Australian Workshop on Interactive Entertainment IE 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambrigde University Press, Cambrigde (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pease, A., Niles, I., Li, J.: The suggested upper merged ontology: a large ontology for the semantic web and its applications. In: Working Notes of the AAAI-2002 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web, Edmonton, Canada, vol. 28 (2002)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peinado, F., Cavazza, M., Pizzi, D.: Revisiting character-based affective storytelling under a narrative BDI framework. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 83–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Perrault, C.: Contes, chap. Cendrillon, pp. 274–79. Flammarion, Paris (1989)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pianta, E., Bentivogli, L., Girardi, C.: MultiWordNet: developing an aligned multilingual database. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Global WordNet, January 2002. http://multiwordnet.fbk.eu/paper/MWN-India-published.pdf
  36. 36.
    Rahimtoroghi, E., Corcoran, T., Swanson, R., Walker, M.A., Sagae, K., Gordon, A.: Minimal narrative annotation schemes and their applications. In: Seventh Intelligent Narrative Technologies Workshop. AAAI Publications (2014)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Raimond, Y., Abdallah, S.A., Sandler, M.B., Giasson, F.: The music ontology. In: ISMIR, pp. 417–422. Citeseer (2007)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spencer, S.: The Playwright’s Guidebook: An Insightful Primer on the Art of Dramatic Writing. Faber & Faber (2002). http://books.google.it/books?id=nDrHmckSqi4C
  39. 39.
    Styan, J.L.: The Elements of Drama. University Press, Cambridge (1963)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M.: The NeOn Methodology for ontology engineering. In: Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 9–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Szondi, P.: Theory of the moderna drama parts i-ii. Boundary 2 11(3), 191–230 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Varela, M.E.: Interoperable performance research promises and perils of the semantic web. Drama Rev. 60(3), 136–147 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincenzo Lombardo
    • 1
  • Rossana Damiano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonio Pizzo
    • 2
  1. 1.CIRMA and Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.CIRMA and Dipartimento di Studi UmanisticiUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations