Advertisement

Audio Commons Ontology: A Data Model for an Audio Content Ecosystem

  • Miguel CerianiEmail author
  • György FazekasEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11137)

Abstract

Multiple online services host repositories of audio clips of different kinds, ranging from music tracks, albums, playlists, to instrument samples and loops, to a variety of recorded or synthesized sounds. Programmatic access to these resources maybe used by client applications for tasks ranging from customized musical listening and exploration, to music/sounds creation from existing sounds and samples, to audio-based user interaction in apps and games. We designed an ontology to facilitate interoperability between repositories and clients in this domain. There was no previous comprehensive data model for our domain, however the new ontology relates to existing ontologies, such as the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records for the authoring and publication process of creative works, the Music Ontology for the authoring and publication of music, the EBU Core ontology to describe media files and formats and the Creative Commons Licensing ontology to describe licences. This paper documents the design of the ontology and its evaluation with respect to specific requirements gathered from stakeholders.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the European Commission H2020 research and innovation grant AudioCommons under grant agreement number 688382.

References

  1. 1.
    Fazekas, G., Raimond, Y., Jakobson, K., Sandler, M.: An overview of Semantic Web activities in the OMRAS2 Project. J. New Music Res. Spec. Issue Music Inf. OMRAS2 Project 39(4), 295–311 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: METHONTOLOGY: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the Ontological Engineering AAAI-97 Spring Symposium Series. American Asociation for Artificial Intelligence (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Font, F., et al.: Audio commons: Bringing creative commons audio content to the creative industries. In: Audio Engineering Society Conference: 61st International Conference: Audio for Games, February 2016. http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=18093
  4. 4.
    Gemmeke, J.F., et al.: Audio Set: an ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: a Java API for working with OWL 2 ontologies. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2009, vol. 529, pp. 49–58. CEUR-WS.org (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matentzoglu, N., Malone, J., Mungall, C., Stevens, R.: Miro: guidelines for minimum information for the reporting of an ontology. J. Biomed. Semant. 9(1), 6 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-017-0172-7
  7. 7.
    McBride, B.: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Final Report. UBCIM Publications, New Series 19 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miles, A., Bechhofer, S.: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System - Reference. https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  9. 9.
    Motik, B., et al.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax, 2nd edn. W3C REC 11 December 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Musen, M.A., the ProtégéTeam: The Protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matt. 1(4), 4–12 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakatani, T., Okuno, H.G.: Sound ontology for computational auditory scence analysis. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 1004–1010 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poveda-Villalón, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C.: Oops!(ontology pitfall scanner!): an on-line tool for ontology evaluation. Int. J. Semant. Web Inform. Syst. (IJSWIS) 10(2), 7–34 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raimond, Y., Abdallah, S.: The event ontology. Technical report (2007). http://motools.sourceforge.net/event (2007)
  14. 14.
    Raimond, Y., Abdallah, S.A., Sandler, M.B., Giasson, F.: The music ontology. In: ISMIR, vol. 422, Vienna, Austria (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shearer, R., Motik, B., Horrocks, I.: HermiT: A Highly-Efficient OWL Reasoner. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2008, vol. 432, p. 91 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sporny, M., Longley, D., Kellogg, G., Lanthaler, M., Lindström, N.: JSON-LD 1.0: a JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data. W3C Recommendation 16 January 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I.: Fact++ description logic reasoner: System description. Automated reasoning, pp. 292–297 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Digital MusicQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations