Enhancement of Optical Coherence Tomography Images: An Iterative Approach Using Various Filters

  • M. Saya Nandini Devi
  • S. SanthiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics book series (LNCVB, volume 30)


Speckle is an important noise in the optical coherence tomography (OCT) images that play a vital role in the degradation of the visual quality of images and makes it difficult to assess the quality of the images. In order to improve the quality, filtering is essential which removes the noises and reproduce the OCT images. This proposed work addresses various filters like Mean, Median, Adaptive Median, Gaussian, and Wiener in order to enhance the OCT image. This paper gives estimate of various filtering techniques on the basis of the performance indices calculated from the experimental results. The results of this research work suggest the filter suitable for OCT images depending on the Cross-Correlation, Mean Square Error-(MSE) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio-(PSNR) which are very much used as performance indices in medical image applications and its analysis. Initially, the filter is tested with standard medical image and performance measures are calculated. Next, noise-corrupted OCT image is applied as an input to the filter for the purpose of denoising and finally, a comparative analysis was performed.


Biomedical image processing Image quality assessment Optical coherence tomography Speckle 



We would like to thank Dr. M. Ravishankar, director of the Nethralayam and Senior Consultant of the Rajan Eye Care Hospital, Chennai for providing the Optical Coherence Tomography Images.


  1. 1.
    Gocławski J, Sekulska-Nalewajko J (2016) A new idea of fast three-dimensional median filtering for despeckling of optical coherence tomography images. Image Process Commun 20(3):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zaki F, Wang Y, Su H, Yuan X, Liu X (2017) Noise adaptive wavelet thresholding for speckle noise removal in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 8(5):2720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gómez-Valverde JJ, Ortuño JE, Guerra P, Hermann B (2015) Evaluation of speckle reduction with denoising filtering in optical coherence tomography for dermatology. IEEE, vol 2, No 1, pp 494–497Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Padmasini N, Abbiraime KS, Yacin SM (2014) Speckle noise reduction in spectral domain optical coherence tomography retinal images using anisotropic diffusion filtering. IEEE, vol 1, No 3, pp 244–248Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bian L, Suo J, Chen F, Dai Q (2015) Multiframe denoising of high-speed optical coherence tomography data using interframe and intraframe priors. J Biomed 20(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avanaki MR, Cernat R, Tadrous PJ, Tatla T, Podoleanu AG, Hojjatoleslami S (2013) Spatial compounding algorithm for speckle reduction of dynamic focus OCT images. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 25(15):1439–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vermeer K, Mo J, Weda J, Lemij H, de Boer J (2014) Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 5(1):322–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer MA, Borsdorf A, Wagner M, Hornegger J, Mardin CY, Tornow RP (2012) Wavelet denoising of multiframe optical coherence tomography data. Biomed Opt Express 3(3):572–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aum J, Kim J, Jeong J (2015) Effective speckle noise suppression in optical coherence tomography images using nonlocal means denoising filter with double Gaussian anisotropic kernels. Appl Opt 54(13):D43–D50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rajabi H, Zirak A (2016) Speckle noise reduction and motion artifact correction based on modified statistical parameters estimation in OCT images. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mittal A (2013) Automatic noise identification using GLCM properties. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng 3:943–947Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alex A, Weingast J et al (2013) Three dimensional multiphoton/optical coherence tomography for diagnostic applications in dermatology. J Biophotonics 6(4):352–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srinivasan PP et al (2014) Automatic segmentation of up to ten layer boundaries in SD-OCT images of the mouse retina with and without missing layers due to pathology. J Biomed Opt Express 5(2):348–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sudeep PV, Niwas SI, Palanisamy P, Rajan J, Xiaojun Y, Wang X, Luo Y, Liu L (2016) Enhancement and bias removal of optical coherence tomography images: an iterative approach with adaptive bilateral filtering. Comput Biol Med 71:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fang L, Li S, McNabb RP, Nie Q, Kuo AN, Toth CA, Izatt JA, Farsiu S (2013) Fast acquisition and reconstruction of optical coherence tomography images via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(11):2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Instrumentation EngineeringAnnamalai UniversityChidambaramIndia

Personalised recommendations