Advertisement

Mortgage Origination

  • Pelma RajapakseEmail author
  • Shanuka Senarath
Chapter

Abstract

The main focus of this chapter is on the mortgage origination process. As part of the examination, this chapter extends its discussion towards capital adequacy guidelines set by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority and the consequences of such guidelines on originators (banks and Independent Mortgage Originators), initial borrowers, providers of credit enhancement, investors of residential mortgage-backed security (RMBS), and in general, their effects on asset securitisation in an Australian context. The latter part of the chapter looks into capital adequacy guidelines provided by Basel II. Finally, an international comparison of capital adequacy requirements is made towards the end of the discussion.

Keywords

Mortgage origination Capital adequacy Prudential regulation Basel II 

Bibliography

Books and Book Chapters

  1. Frankel, T., Securitization: Structured Financing, Financial Asset Pools, and Asset-Backed Securities, Boston: Little Brown & Co, 1991, v I and v II.Google Scholar
  2. Gillooly, M. (ed.), Securities over Personality, Sydney: The Federation Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. Salmond, J. W., Jurisprudence, 12th edition, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. Sykes, E. I. and Walker, S., The Law of Securities, 5th edition, Sydney: Law Book Company, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Wood, P. R., Title Finance, Derivatives, Set-Off, and Netting, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Journal Articles

  1. Hodgkin, A. M., ‘Bank and Thrift Regulatory Considerations’, in R. S. Borod (ed.), Securitization: Asset-Backed and Mortgage-Backed Securities, Boston: Brown, Rudnick, Freed & Gesmer, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Kanda, H., ‘Securitization in Japan’ (1998) (8) (2) Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 359.Google Scholar
  3. Marc, G. S., ‘French Securitisation Law and Practice’ (1998) 1 The Securitisation Conduit 10.Google Scholar
  4. Park, E. J., ‘Allowing Japanese Banks to Engage in Securitization: Potential Benefits, Regulatory Obstacles, and Theories for Reform’ (1996) 17 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 723.Google Scholar
  5. Railton, B., Kinami, N. and Lawden, J., ‘Securitisation Legislation in Japan and Thailand’ (2002) 17 (1) Journal of International Banking Law 12.Google Scholar
  6. Senarath, S., ‘Securitisation and the global financial crisis: can risk retention prevent another crisis?’ (2017) 18 International Journal of Business and Globalisation 153.Google Scholar
  7. Shimada, Y. and Itoh, S., ‘Japanese Asset Securitization: A Guide for Practitioners’ (1997) 38 Harvard International Law Journal 171.Google Scholar
  8. Stuart, L. and Old, G., ‘The FSA Rules for Securitisation and Loan Transfers – A User’s Guide’ (2000) 15 (9) Journal of International Banking Law 211.Google Scholar
  9. Thompson, F. G., ‘An Overview of Current Issues and Trends in the Canadian Securitization Market’ (1994) 37 Private Investments Abroad 81.Google Scholar

Working Papers, Magazines, Newspapers and Reports

  1. Standard and Poor’s, ‘Credit Ratings on Mortgage-Backed Securities’, Structured Finance Australia and New Zealand, Melbourne, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Prudential Standard APS 112 – Capital Adequacy: Standardised Approach to Credit Risk, July 2019, https://www.apra.gov.au (11 November 2019).
  3. Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Prudential Standard APS 111 – Capital Adequacy: Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital, January 2018, https://www.apra.gov.au (11 November 2019).
  4. BIS, Basel Accord II New Framework (1988) Annex 2, http://www.bis.org (15 October 2004).
  5. BIS, Basel Accord II Consultative Paper 3 (April 2003), http://www.bis.org (15 October 2004).
  6. Senarath, S. ‘The Dodd-Frank Act doesn’t solve the principal-agent problem in asset securitisation’ (2017) blogs.lse.ac.uk (11 November 2018). http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2017/04/21/the-dodd-frank-act-doesnt-solve-the-principal-agent-problem-in-asset-securitisation/
  7. Senarath, S., Not so “Bankruptcy-Remote’: An insight into Sri Lankan Securitization Practices in a Post_GFC Context’ (Paper presented at the MAC-MME conference 2016, Prague, Czech Republic).Google Scholar

Web Sites

  1. BIS Home Page, http://www.bis.org
  2. APRA Home Page, http://www.apra.gov.au
  3. Financial Services Authority Home Page, http://www.fsa.gov.uk
  4. Government of Canada The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions home page, http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.University of ColomboColomboSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations