Advertisement

Introduction

  • Shlomit Flint Ashery
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Introducing the case study of Whitechapel, this chapter is focusing on the spatial dynamics of social enclaves in an ethnic-traditional enclave and the role of individuals’ preferences and social relations—versus community leadership and government directives—in shaping minority groups’ spaces. The methodological objective is to propose complementary qualitative and quantitative procedures to improve understanding of residential processes: High-resolution examination of these residential activities will describe the rich potential of bottom-up research design and suggest its applicability to other social phenomena as well. The case study of Whitechapel shed light on the ways in which spatial and cultural logics intersect in the urban realm, opening up the possibility of an integrated understanding of the development of the city.

Keywords

Spatial dynamics Social enclaves Individuals’ preferences Vs government directives Shaping groups’ spaces 

References

  1. Abrams D, Hogg MA (2006) Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfasi N (2014) Doomed to informality: familial versus modern planning in Arab towns in Israel. Plan Theor Pract 4(3):170–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson L, O’Dowd J (1999) Borders, border regions and territoriality: contradictory meanings, changing significance. Reg Stud 33(7):593–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bankston CL III, Zhou M (1995) Religious participation, ethnic identification, and adaptation of Vietnamese adolescents in an immigrant community. Sociol Q 36:3Google Scholar
  6. Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benenson I (2004) Agent-based modeling: from individual residential choice to urban residential dynamics. In: Goodchild MF, Janelle DG (eds) Spatially integrated social science: examples in best practice, vol 42, issue 6–7. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 67–95Google Scholar
  8. Benenson I, Omer I, Hatna E (2002) Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics—the case of Yaffo, Tel-Aviv. Environ Plan B 29:491–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumer H (1951) Collective behavior. In: Lee AM (ed) New outline of the principles of sociology. Barnes and Noble, New York, pp 166–222Google Scholar
  10. Boal FW (1978) Ethnic residential segregation. In: Herbert DT, Johnston RJ (eds) Social areas in cities. Wiley, London, pp 57–95Google Scholar
  11. Boal F (1996) Integration and division: sharing and segregating in belfast. Plan Pract Res 11(2):151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd M (1989) Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas. Int Migr Rev, Special Silver Anniversary Issue: International Migration an Assessment for the 90’s (Autumn, 1989) 23(3):638–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown LA, Chung S (2006) Spatial segregation, segregation indices and the geographical perspective. Popul Space Place 12(2):125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell H (2002) Planning: an idea of value (Inaugural Lecture). Town Plan Rev 73(3):271–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castells M (1997) The power of identity. The information age: economy, society and culture (Vol. II.). Blackwell, Cambridge, MA and Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Castles S (2010) Understanding global migration: a social transformation perspective. J Ethnic and Migr Stud 36(10):1565–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chartered Institute of Housing (2010) Impact of housing benefit reformsGoogle Scholar
  18. Coleman D (2008) Time for a fresh start—the case for a UK population register, memorandum to the House of Commons Treasury Committee enquiry on counting the population. In: Written evidence counting the population, Written evidence, 2nd ed, vol II. House of Commons Treasury Committee, London, pp 184–197Google Scholar
  19. Datta A (2009) Making space for Muslims: housing Bangladeshi families in East London. In: Phillips R (ed) Muslim spaces of hope. Zed Books, London. ISBN 9781848133006Google Scholar
  20. Davies AR (2001) Hidden or hiding? Public perceptions of participation in the planning system. Town Plan Rev 72:193–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dench G, Gavron K, Young M (2006) The new East End: kinship, race and conflict. Profile Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Desai R (2011) Producing and contesting the “communalized city”: Hindutva politics and urban space in Ahmedabad. In: AlSayyad N, Massoumi M (eds) The fundamentalist city? Religiosity and the remaking of urban space. Routledge, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Dougherty KD, Huyser RK (2008) Racially diverse congregations: organizational identity and the accommodation of differences. J Sci Stud Relig 47(1):23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dudley SC, Roozen AD (2001) Faith communities today: a report on religion in the United States today. Hartford Institute for Religion Research, Hartford, CTGoogle Scholar
  25. Dustmann C, Theodoropoulos N (2010) Ethnic minority immigrants and their children in Britain. Oxford Economic Papers 62(2):209–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dwyer C, Uberoi V (2013) 11| British Muslims and ‘community cohesion’ debates. In: Muslim spaces of hope: geographies of possibility in Britain and the West. p 99Google Scholar
  27. Eade J, Garbin D (2001) Changing narratives of violence: Bangladeshis and the competition for resources in the global city. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Flint J (2015a) Housing and the realignment of urban socio-spatial contracts. Hous Theory Soc 32(1):39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flint S (2015b) Public welfare or sectarianism: a new challenge for planning. Plan Theory Pract 16(3):299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flint S, Alfasi N, Benenson I (2012) Between friends and strangers: micro-segregation in a Haredi neighbourhood in Jerusalem. City and Community 11(2):171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foner N, Rath J, Duyvendak JW et al (eds) (2014) New York and Amsterdam: immigration and the new urban landscape. NYU Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Gellner E (1990) Tribalism and the state in the Middle East. In: Khoury PS, Kostiner J (eds) Tribalism and the state in the Middle East. University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp 109–126Google Scholar
  33. Giffinger R (1998) Segregation in Vienna: impact of market barriers and rent regulations. Urban Studies 35(10):1791–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glick SN, Çaglar A (eds) (2011) Locating migration: rescaling cities and migrants. Cornell University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Glynn S (2006) How the Bangladeshi War of Independence has haunted Tower Hamlets. Soc Hist J 2:56–75Google Scholar
  36. Gray S, Milton R, Hudson-Smith A (2015) Advances in crowdsourcing: surveys, social media and geospatial analysis: towards a big data toolkit. In: Advances in crowdsourcing. pp 163–180.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18341-1_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greer S (1962) The emerging city: myth and reality. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall SM (2015) Migrant Urbanisms: ordinary cities and everyday resistance. Sociology 49(5):853–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hall M, Stringfield J (2014) Undocumented migration and the residential segregation of Mexicans in new destinations. Soc Sci Res 47:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hammett C (2003) Unequal city: London in the global arena. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Herriott RE, Firestone WA (1983) Multisite qualitative policy research: optimizing description and generalizability. Educational researcher, 12(2), 14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hunter A (1985) Private, parochial and public social orders: the problem of crime and inactivity in urban communities. In: Kasinitz P (ed) Metropolis: center and symbol of our times. New York University Press, New York, pp 204–225Google Scholar
  43. Iceland J (2009) Where we live now: immigration and race in the United States. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  44. Ihlanfeldt K, Scafidi B (2002) Black self segregation as a cause of housing segregation: evidence from the multi-city study of urban inequality. J Urban Econ 51(2):366–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. International Labour Office (2005) Working and employment conditions in New EU Member States. International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  46. Kasarda JD (1978) Urbanization, community, and the metropolitan problem. In: Street D (ed) Handbook of contemporary urban life. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 27–35Google Scholar
  47. Kesteloot C, Meert H (1999) Informal spaces: the geography of informal economic activities. Int J Urban Reg Res 23(2):232–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kintrea K, Bannister J, Pickering J, Reid M, Suzuki N (2008) Young people and territoriality in British cities. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Knox P (1982) Urban social geography: an introduction. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Komarova M (2008) Shared space in belfast and the limits of a shared future. In: Conflict in Cities Working Papers Series, 3 Conflict in cities and the contested state: everyday life and the possibilities for transformation in Belfast, Jerusalem and other divided cities. UK Economic and Social Research Council Large Grants Scheme, RES-060-25-0015, 2007–2012Google Scholar
  51. Kong L (2001) Mapping ‘new’ geographies of religion: politics and in modernity. Prog Hum Geogr 25(2):211–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lacayo C (2016) Latinos need to stay in their place: differential segregation in a multi-ethnic suburb. Societies 6(3):25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee TR (1977) Race and residence. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Lee P, Murie A (1997) Poverty, housing tenure and social exclusion. The Policy Press in association with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, UKGoogle Scholar
  55. Ley D (1996) The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. Lofland HL (2009) The public realm: exploring the city’s quintessential Social territory. Aldine Transaction Publications, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  57. Lofland J, Lofland LH (1984) Analyzing social settingsGoogle Scholar
  58. Lupton R, Power A (2004) Minority ethnic groups in Britain. CASE Brooking Census Briefs No. 2Google Scholar
  59. Macedo S (1995) Liberal civic education and religious fundamentalism: the case of God John Rawls? Ethics 105:468–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcuse P (1997) The enclave, the citadel, and the ghetto: what has changed in the post-Fordist US city. Urban affairs review 33(2):228–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Massey DS (1987) The ethnosurvey in theory and practice. Int Migr Rev 21(4):1498–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Massey DS, Capoferro C (2004) Measuring undocumented migration. Int Migrat Rev 38(3):1075–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McConnell ED (2012) House poor in Los Angeles: examining patterns of housing-induced poverty by race, nativity, and legal status. Hous Policy Debate 22(4):605–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McConnell ED, Marcelli EA (2007) Buying into the American dream? Mexican immigrants, legal status, and homeownership in Los Angeles County. Soc Sci Q 88(1):199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McKay S, Craw M, Chopra D (2006) Migrant workers in England and Wales. An assessment of migrant worker health and safety risks. Crown Copyright: Health and Safety Executive, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Milanovic B (2016) Global inequality: a new approach for the age of globalization United Nations (2015) international migration report. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  67. Office for National Statistics (2011) Migration statistics quarterly. Report No 8. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/mig0211.pdf
  68. Olympic Delivery Authority (2007) Equality and diversity strategy: draft for consultation. ODA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Palmer A (1989) The East End. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Peach C (2006) Islam, ethnicity and South Asian religions in London 2001 census. Trans Institute of British Geographers 31(3):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Phillips D (2015) Claiming spaces: British Muslim negotiations of urban citizenship in an era of new migration. Trans Inst Brit Geogr 40(1):62–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rey SJ, Folch DC (2011) Impact of spatial effects on income segregation indices. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35(6):431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Riesebrodt M (1993) Pious passion: the emergence of modern fundamentalism in the United States and Iran. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  74. Saegert S, Winkel GH (1990) Environment psychology. Annu Rev Psychol 41:441–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scheurich J (2007) Research methods in the postmodern. Falmer Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Sennett R (2012) Together: the rituals, pleasures, and politics of cooperation. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharma M (2012) A geographic perspective on intra-urban racial/ethnic diversity, segregation, and clustering in Knoxville, Tennessee: 1990–2000. Appl Geogr 32(2):310–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sheskin D (2007) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 4th edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  79. Speare A (1974) Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography 11(2):173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Speare A, Goldstein S, Frey HW (1975) Residential mobility, migration, and metropolitan change. Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  81. Stillwell J, Williams O (2005) Ethnic population distribution, immigration and internal migration in Britain. In: BSPS (ed) British Society for Population Studies. University of Kent, CanterburyGoogle Scholar
  82. Tajfel H (1972) Social categorization (English Translation of “La Categorisation Sociale”). In: Moscovici S (ed) Introduction a La Psychologie Sociale, vol 1. Larousse, Paris, pp 272–302Google Scholar
  83. Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, pp 33–47Google Scholar
  84. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) Psychology of intergroup relations, 2nd edn. NelsonHall, Chicago, pp 7–24Google Scholar
  85. Tausch N, Hewstone M, Schmid K, Hughes J, Cairns E (2011) Extended contact effects as a function of closeness of relationship with in group contacts. Group Process Intergroup Relat 14(2):239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tilly C, Brown CH (1967) On uprooting, kinship, and the auspices of migration. Int J Comp Sociol 8(2):139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner CJ, Hogg AM, Oakes JP, Reicher DS, Wetherell SM (1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  88. Valins O (2003) Stubborn identities and the construction of socio-spatial boundaries: ultra-orthodox Jews living in contemporary Britain. Trans Inst Br Geogr 28(2):158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wahlstrom AK (2005) Liberal democracies and encompassing religious communities: a defense of autonomy and accommodation. J Soc Philos 36(1):31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Waterman S, Kosmin AB (1988) Residential patterns and processes: a study of Jews in three London boroughs. Trans Inst Br Geogr 13(1):79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Whyte WF (1993; 2015). Street corner society: the social structure of an Italian slum, 4th edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ISBN 0-226-89545-9Google Scholar
  92. Wirth L (1956) Community life and social policy. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  93. Woodbridge J (2005) Sizing the unauthorised (illegal) migrant population in the United Kingdom in 2001. Home Office Online Report 29/05Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and EnvironmentBar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  2. 2.Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA)University College London (UCL)LondonUK

Personalised recommendations