Advertisement

Party to Contracts

  • Roberto CippitaniEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Within traditional private law, contracts are the main legal instruments to exchange patrimonial elements, mainly obligations and property rights, from one subject to another.

The position of the parties within the contract is characterised by at least three features: each party is expected to have interests different from those of the other party; the opposing interests of the parties must lead to a patrimonial balance, as a result of the exchange; the parties to a contract are considered to be formally equal, although they have different functions within the same contract.

During the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the social and ideological context of private law changed substantially. Particularly after the first half of the twentieth century, the construction of the traditional private law was put into crisis as a result of two phenomena: constitutionalisation and European integration. Those processes are affecting the traditional ideas concerning the parties to the contracts.

References

  1. Alpa, G. (1996). Autodisciplina e codice di condotta. In P. Zatti (Ed.), Le fonti di autodisciplina (p. 3 ff). Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, H. W. (1995). Convergence among regions of the European Union 1950–1990. Papers in Regional Science, 74(2), 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 107–182.Google Scholar
  4. Bobbio, N. (1984). Il problema della guerra e le vie della pace. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  5. Caprioli, S. (2008). Il Codice civile. Struttura e vicende. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
  6. Carbonnier, J. (2004). Droit civil (Vol. I). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  7. Cardone, A. (2011). Diritti fondamentali (tutela multilivello dei). In Enciclopedia del diritto. Annali, IV. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
  8. Cédras, M. J. (2003). Le solidarisme contractuel en doctrine et devant la Cour de cassation. In www.courdecassation.fr
  9. Cherednychenko, O. (2010). Fundamental rights, policy issues and the draft common frame of reference for European private law. European Review of Contract Law, 6(1), 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cippitani, R., & Gatt, S. (2009). Legal developments and problems of the Bologna process within the European Higher Education Area and European Integration. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clive, E. (2008). An introduction to the academic draft common frame of reference. Era Forum, 9, S13–S31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colombi Ciacchi, A. (2006). The constitutionalization of European contract law: Judicial convergence and social justice. European Review of Contract Law, 2(2). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2013063
  13. De La Fuente, A., & Domenéch, R. (1999). The redistributive effects of the EU budget: An analysis and some reflections on the Agenda 2000 negotiations. CERP Discussion Paper, 2113.Google Scholar
  14. Espinoza de los Monteros Sánchez, J. E. (2010). Contitucionalismo global. In Diccionario Histórico Judicial de México, Ideas e Instituciones (Vol. I). México: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación de México.Google Scholar
  15. Fuchs, A. (2008). A plea a Europe-wide discussion of draft common frame of reference. Era Forum, 9, S1–S6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galgano, F. (2001). Lex mercatoria. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  17. Häberle, P. (2002). Dallo Stato nazionale all’Unione europea: evoluzioni dello Stato costituzionale. Diritto pubblico comparato europeo, 460 ff.Google Scholar
  18. Halperin, J. L. (1992). L’impossible Code Civil. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  19. Hesselink, M. (2003). The horizontal effect of social rights in European contract law. In M. Hesselink et al. (Eds.), Privaatrecht tussen autonomie en solidariteit. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  20. Irti, N. (2003). L’ordine giuridico del mercato. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  21. Jhering, R. (1972). Lo scopo del diritto (M. G. Losano, Trans.). Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, J. (2012). Human dignity in the EU charter of fundamental rights and its interpretation before the European Court of Justice. Liverpool Law Review, 33, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lipari, N. (1987). La formazione negoziale del diritto. Rivista di diritto civile, 307 ff.Google Scholar
  24. López-Bazo, E., Vayá, E., Mora, A. J., & Suriñac, J. (1999). Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Annals of Regional Science, 33, 257–370.Google Scholar
  25. Millns, S. (1996). Dwarf-throwing and human dignity: A French perspective. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 18(3), 375 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pérez Luño, A. E. (1991). Los derechos fundamentals. Madrid: Tecnos.Google Scholar
  27. Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross border regions in Europe. Significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perlingeri, P. (1983). Depatrimonializzazione e diritto civile. Rassegna diritto civile, 1 ff.Google Scholar
  29. Pernice, I. (1999). Multilevel constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European constitution-making revisited? Common Market Law Review, 36(4), 703–750.Google Scholar
  30. Rawls, J. (1980). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
  31. Sanz Caballero, S. (2013). Obligaciones positivas del Estado. In M. I. Álvarez Ledesma & R. Cippitani (Eds.), Diccionario analítico de Derechos humanos e integración juridical (pp. 466–474). Roma-Perugia-México: ISEG.Google Scholar
  32. Savigny, F. K. (1886). Il sistema del diritto romano attuale (Scialoja, Trans.) (Vol. I). Turin: UTET.Google Scholar
  33. Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  34. Wilkinson, S. (2003). Bodies for sale: Ethics and exploitation in the human body trade. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Zagreblesky, G. (1992). Il diritto mite. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations