Advertisement

Consumer

  • Joaquín Sarrión EsteveEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In the present chapter, we propose to analyse the category of consumer and how this individual status is being conditioned by European Union (EU) law. After a brief reference to the methodology used, the analysis begins with a consideration about the foundations of consumer protection in EU law and how it developed from an instrument to develop the EU internal market to a relevant one to define the Status of EU citizens and residents as consumers and players in the market under modern EU law. We will consider consumer protection configuration, the notion of consumer, and the development of a consumer legal framework in the EU, with references to national legislation that can reinforce consumer status. We also consider the European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law, not only regarding its important role in the definition of the notion of a consumer but also in the development of a consumer constitutional procedural for Status, consolidating the consumer position in the national judicial process.

References

  1. Arzoz Santiesteban, X. (2013). La autonomía institucional y procedimental de los Estados miembros en la Unión Europea: Mito y realidad. Revista de Administración Pública, 191, 159–197.Google Scholar
  2. Barnard, C. (2010). The substantive law of the EU (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benöhr, I. (2013). EU consumer law and human rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chalmers, D., Davies, G., & Monti, G. (2014). European Union law (3rd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vries, S. (2012). Consumer protection and the EU single market rules – The search for the ‘paradigm consumer. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 5(4), 228–242.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2017a). Consumer rights and law. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_rights/index_en.htm
  7. European Commission. (2017b). An evaluation study of national procedural laws and practices in terms of their impact on the free circulation of judgements and on the equivalence and effectiveness of the procedural protection of consumers under EU consumer law. JUST/2014/RCON/PR/CIVI/0082. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/item-detail.cfm?item_id=612847
  8. Galetta, D.-U. (2011). Procedural autonomy of EU member states: Paradise lost? Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Giliker, P. (2018). The Consumer Rights Act 2015 – a bastion of European consumer rights? Legal Studies, 37(1), 78–102.  https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gómez Sánchez, Y. (2011). Constitucionalismo multinivel: Derechos Fundamentales. Madrid, Spain: Sanz y Torres.Google Scholar
  11. Hedegaard, J. S., & Wrbka, S. (2016). The notion of consumer under EU legislation and EU case law: Between the poles of legal certainty and flexibility. In M. Fenwick & S. Wrbka (Eds.), Legal certainty in a contemporary context: Private and criminal law perspectives (pp. 69–88). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howes, G., Twigg-Flesner, C., & Wilhelmsson, T. (2017). Rethinking EU consumer law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kunnecke, A. (2014). New standards in EU consumer rights protection? The new directive 2011/83/EU. European Scientific Journal, 1, 426–437.Google Scholar
  14. Lazíková, J. (2016). The consumer policy in the EU law. EU Agrarian Law, 5(1), 21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1515/eual-2016-0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lazíková, J., & Rumanovská, L. (2016). The notion of consumer in the EU law. EU Agrarian Law, 5(2), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1515/eual-2016-0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leczykiewicz, D., & Weatherill, S. (2016). The images of the consumer in EU law. In D. Leczykiewicz & S. Weatherill (Eds.), The images of the consumer in EU law: Legislation, free movement and competition law. Oxford, England: Hart Publishing. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper 9/2016. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2743283
  17. Luif, P. (2014). The division of powers/competences between the EU and the member states: What can we learn from pre-emption in the United States. In L. S. Rossi & F. Casorali (Eds.), The EU after Lisbon. Amending or coping with the existing treaties (pp. 37–56). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.Google Scholar
  18. Mańko, R. (2013, May 6). The notion of ‘consumer’ in EU law. Library Briefing. Library of the European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2013/130477/LDM_BRI130477_REV1_EN.pdf
  19. Martínez Velencoso, L. M. (2017). The impact of harmonized European private law and the Aquis Communautaire on national law around Europe. In A. Solanes Corella & E. M. Górriz Royo (dir). Legal challenges of the XXI century (pp. 247–298). Valencia, Spain: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
  20. Menendez, J. A. (2003). Rights to solidarity’: Balancing solidarity and economic freedoms. In E. Eriksen, J. Fossum, & J. Menéndez (Eds.), Chartering of Europe, the European charter of fundamental rights and its constitutional implications (pp. 179–198). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Mbh & Co.Google Scholar
  21. Mickilitz, H. W. (2013). Mohamed Aziz-sympathetic and activist, but did the court get it wrong? In ECLN Conference Florence When the ECJ gets it wrong. Retrieved from http://www.ecln.net/tl_files/ECLN/Florence%202013/Micklitz%20-%20The%20ECJ%20gets%20it%20wrong%20Aziz-30-11-14.pdf
  22. Micossi, S. (2016). Thirty years of the single European market (CEPS Special Report, No. 148). Retrieved from https://www.ceps.eu/publications/thirty-years-single-european-market
  23. Rossi, L. S. (2012). Does the Lisbon treaty provide a clear separation of competences between EU and member states? In A. Biondi, P. Eeckhout, & S. Ripley (Eds.), EU after Lisbon (pp. 85–106). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rott, P. (2014). The low-income consumer in European private law. In K. Purnhagen & P. Rott (Eds.), Varieties of European economic law and regulation. Studies in European economic law and regulation (Vol. 3, pp. 675–691). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.Google Scholar
  25. Sarrión, J. (2010). Social rights protection problems in conflicting situations with market freedoms in European Union Law. Revista Universitaria Europea, 13, 85–102.Google Scholar
  26. Sarrión, J. (2011). El nuevo horizonte constitucional para la Unión Europea: A propósito de la entrada en vigor del Tratado de Lisboa y la Carta de Derechos Fundamentales. CEFLegal: Revista Práctica del Derecho, 162, 53–111.Google Scholar
  27. Sarrión, J. (2014a). Effective judicial protection in consumer protection in the ECJ’s Case Law. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2526709
  28. Sarrión, J. (2014b). Sobre la necesaria reforma de la legislación española a la luz de la STJUE de 14 de marzo de 2013, Aziz c. CatalunyaCaixa, C-415/11. In Il diritto patrimoniale di fronte alla crisi economica in Italia e in Spagna (pp. 437–448). Milano, Italy: CEDAM.Google Scholar
  29. Sarrión, J. (2015). Actual trends and challenges of the constitutional fundamental rights and principles in the ECJ case law from the perspective of multilevel constitutionalism. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2656394
  30. Sarrión, J. (2018). The configuration of an EU constitutional procedural status for consumer protection. In A. Bartolini & D. Zammit (Eds.), European dimensions of individual status. Perugia: ISEG. (in press).Google Scholar
  31. Schueller, B. (2012). The definition of consumers in EU consumer law. In J. Devenney & M. Kenny (Eds.), European consumer protection: Theory and practice (pp. 123–142). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schütze, R. (2006). Supremacy without pre-emption? The very slowly emergent doctrine of community pre-emption. Common Market Law Review, 43(4), 1023–1048.Google Scholar
  33. Stuyck, J. (2010). Setting the scene. In H.-W. Micklitz, J. Stuck, & E. Terryn (Eds.), Cases, materials and text on consumer law (pp. 1–69). Oxford, England: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Tridimas, T. (2012). Competence after Lisbon. The elusive search for bright lines. In D. Ashiagbor, N. Countouris, & I. Lianos (Eds.), The European Union after the Lisbon treaty (pp. 47–77). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trstenjak, V., & Beysen, E. (2011). European consumer protection law: Curia semper dabit remedium? Common Market Law Review, 48(1), 95–124.Google Scholar
  36. Weatherill, S. (2002). Pre-emption, harmonisation and distribution of competences to regulate the internal market. In C. Barnard & J. Scott (Eds.), The law of the single market: Unpacking the premises (pp. 41–74). Oxford, England: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Weatherill, S. (2013). EU consumer law and policy. Cheltenham, England: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ramón y Cajal Programme, Departamento de Derecho ConstitucionalUniversidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations