Advertisement

Approaching Correctional Treatment from a Programmatic Standpoint: Risk-Need-Responsivity and Beyond

  • Ashley B. BatastiniEmail author
  • Joshua B. Hill
  • Alexandra Repke
  • Laura M. Gulledge
  • Zoe K. Livengood
Chapter

Abstract

As jails and prisons have become de facto psychiatric facilities, there is a dire need to discuss best practices across the broad spectrum of correctional psychological care while also accounting for larger institutional and policy issues that can affect the implementation of such practices. Previous chapters in this volume have summarized the literature on preferred assessment and treatment options for specific offender subpopulations and/or diagnostic concerns. This concluding chapter discusses best practices in correctional psychology using a more programmatic perspective that expands on, but also encompasses, each of the topics presented in earlier chapters. That is, this chapter provides an overall structure and set of general guidelines for improving outcomes associated with mental health services in correctional settings, regardless of the presenting issue at hand. The discussion is centered largely on the atheoretical and empirically-supported Risk-Needs-Responsivity (R-N-R) model; however, we argue that several additional considerations—namely the treatment of severe mental illness, incorporating advances in technology, and working within inherent systematic constraints—are necessary for developing more comprehensive and ultimately more effective correctional psychology interventions. The chapter begins by highlighting the continuum of psychological services needed in correctional institutions ranging from the treatment of acute mental illness to long-standing, serious criminal behavior. The R-N-R prongs and a bi-adaptive approach for treating offenders with serious mental illness are reviewed, followed by a brief summary of existing off-the-shelf programs for addressing individual risk factors within these models (note: substance abuse and mental illness interventions are discussed more thoroughly elsewhere in this volume). The chapter then presents several technological innovations that appear promising in creating more efficiency within, and greater continuity between, correctional psychology programs, such as the use of videoconferencing and mobile SmartPhones apps. Next, we offer several recommendations for successfully implementing programmatic change and sustaining progress. These include individualizing treatment planning by conducting a proper assessment of risk level and need, and subsequently targeting all that apply to a particular offender; adopting longer-term interventions that adhere to a cognitive-behavioral framework; maintaining adequate training for all staff involved in psychological services from referral to delivery; developing collaborations with researchers and practitioners at local universities; remaining open to novel and emerging ideas; and implementing a standardized process of learning across programs whenever feasible. Finally, we acknowledge common policy and legislative challenges that correctional psychologists may face, and encourage clinicians and administrators to find creative ways to navigate these constraints and demands.

Keywords

The Risk-Need-Responsivity model Criminogenic needs The Central 8 The bi-adaptive approach Telepsychology Program implementation Criminal justice policy 

References

  1. Adams, K., Bennett, K. J., Flanagan, T. J., Marquart, J. W., Cuvelier, S. J., Fritsch, E., … Burton, V. S., Jr. (1994). A large-scale multidimensional test of the effect of prison education programs on offenders’ behavior. The Prison Journal, 74(4), 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. V. (1995). Evaluation of the impact of correctional education programs on recidivism. Columbus, OH: Office of Management Information Systems Bureau of Planning and Evaluation, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The level of service inventory—Revised (LSI-R). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2012). Viewing offender assessment and rehabilitation through the lens of the risk-needs-responsivity model. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 19–40). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Apel, R., Blokland, A., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Schellen, M. V. (2010). The impact of first-time imprisonment on marriage and divorce: A risk set matching approach. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(2), 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ax, R. K., Fagan, T. J., Magaletta, P. R., Morgan, R. D., Nussbaum, D., & White, T. W. (2007). Innovations in correctional assessment and treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 893–905.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807301555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Batastini, A. B., King, C. M., Morgan, R. D., & McDaniel, B. (2016). Telepsychological services with criminal justice and substance abuse clients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Services, 13(1), 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batastini, A. B., & Morgan, R. D. (2016). Connecting the disconnected: Preliminary results and lessons learned from a telepsychology initiative with special management inmates. Psychological Services, 13(3), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Batastini, A. B., Morgan, R. D., Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2016). Stepping Up, Stepping Out: A Mental Health Treatment Program for Inmates Detained in Restrictive Housing. Under contract with Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  11. Batiuk, M. E., Lahm, K. F., McKeever, M., Wilcox, N., & Wilcox, P. (2005). Disentanglinmg the effects of correctional education: Are current policies misguided? An event history analysis. Criminal Justice, 5(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bewley, M. T., & Morgan, R. D. (2011). A national survey of mental health services available to offenders with mental illness: Who is doing what? Law and Human Behavior, 35(5), 351–363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9242-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourke, M. L., & Van Hasselt, V. B. (2001). Social problem-solving skills training for incarcerated offenders: A treatment manual. Behavior Modification, 25(2), 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brazell, D., Crayton, A., Mukamal, D. A., Solomon, A. L., & Lindahl, N. (2009). From the classroom to the community: Exploring the role of education during incarceration and reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute: Justice Policy Center.Google Scholar
  15. Brewster, D. R., & Sharp, S. F. (2002). Educational programs and recidivism in Oklahoma: Another look. The Prison Journal, 82(3), 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burdon, W. M., Messina, N. P., & Prendergast, M. L. (2004). The california treatment expansion initiative: Aftercare participation, recidivism, and predictors of outcomes. The Prison Journal, 84(1), 61–80. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0032885503262455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burke, L. O., & Vivian, J. E. (2001). The effect of college programming on recidivism rates at the Hampton County House of Correction: A 5-year study. Journal of Correctional Education, 52(4), 160–162.Google Scholar
  18. Bush, J., Glick, B., & Taymans, J. (1997). Thinking for a change: Integrated cognitive behavior change program. National Institute of Corrections. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2012). Emerging findings from research on adolescent development and juvenile justice. Victims and Offenders, 7(4), 428–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chappell, C. (2004). Post-secondary correctional education and recidivism: A meta-analysis of research conducted 1990–1999. The Journal of Correctional Education, 55(2), 148–169.Google Scholar
  21. Cherney, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2016). Finding and keeping a job: The value and meaning of employment for parolees. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(1), 21–37.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14548858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, P. M. (2011). An evidence-based intervention for offenders. Corrections Today, 73(1), 62–64.Google Scholar
  23. Cobbina, J. E., Huebner, B. M., & Berg, M. T. (2012). Men, women, and postrelease offending: An examination of the nature of the link between relational ties and recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cressey, D. R. (1955). Changing criminals: The application of the theory of differential association. American Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DeMatteo, D., Hunt, E., Batastini, A., & LaDuke, C. (2010). The disconnect between assessment and intervention in the risk management of criminal offenders. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 59–74.Google Scholar
  26. Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk of violence—User guide. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  27. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review. NCCD News, 45(4), 438–452.Google Scholar
  28. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449–467.Google Scholar
  29. Draper, C. E., Errington, S., Omar, S., & Makhita, S. (2013). The therapeutic benefits of sport in the rehabilitation of young sexual offenders: A qualitative evaluation of the Fight with Insight programme. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(4), 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Einhorn, L., Williams, T., Stanley, S., Wunderlin, N., Markman, H., & Eason, J. (2008). PREP inside and out: Marriage education for inmates. Family Process, 47(3), 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fagan, T. J., & Ax, R. K. (Eds.). (2011). Correctional mental health: From theory to best practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Fazel, S., Bains, P., & Doll, H. (2006). Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: A systematic review. Addiction, 101(2), 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferguson, L. M., & Wormith, J. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of Moral Reconation Therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(9), 1076–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallant, D., Sherry, E., & Nicholson, M. (2015). Recreation or rehabilitation? Managing sport for development programs with prison populations. Sport Management Review, 18(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. (2013). Practicing psychology in correctional settings. In I. B. Weiner & R. K. Otto (Eds.), Handbook of forensic psychology (4th ed., pp. 759–794). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Gerber, J., & Fritsch, E. J. (1995). Adult academic and vocational correctional education programs: A review of recent research. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22(1/2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goldstein, A. P., Nensen, R., Daleflod, B., & Kalt, M. (Eds.). (2004). New perspectives on aggression replacement training: Practice, research, and application. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Hallundbaek, H. (2017). Art for a change: Innovative reentry program shows off practical implications. Corrections Today, 79(1), 56–61.Google Scholar
  39. Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809338545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., & Simpson, D. D. (2006). Recidivism following mandated residential substance abuse treatment for felony probationers. The Prison Journal, 86(2), 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hull, K., Forrester, S., Brown, J., Jobe, D., & McCullen, C. (2000). Analysis of recidivism rates for participants of the academic/vocational/transition education programs offered by the Virginia Department of Correctional Education. Journal of Correctional Education, 51(2), 256–261.Google Scholar
  42. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., & Butzin, C. A. (2004). Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime and Delinquency, 50(1), 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jackson, M. A., & Verdino, J. R. (2012). Vocational psychology. Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories, 1157–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jancic, M. (1998). Does correctional education have an effect on recidivism? The Journal of Correctional Education, 49(4), 152–161.Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, K. F. (2013). Preparing ex-offenders for work: Applying self-determination theory to social cognitive career counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 50, 83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14548858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kennedy, R. B., & Kennedy, D. A. (2004). Using the myers-briggs type indicator® in career counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 41(1), 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Knight, K., Garner, B. R., Simpson, D. D., Morey, J. T., & Flynn, P. M. (2006). An assessment for criminal thinking. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lamb, H. R., & Weinberger, L. E. (1998). Persons with severe mental illness in jails and prisons: A review. Psychiatric Services, 49(4), 483–492.  https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.49.4.483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Latessa, E., Lovins, B., & Lux, J. (2014). The Ohio risk Assessment System, Misdemeanor Assessment Tool (ORAS-MAT) and Misdemeanor Screening Tool (ORAS-MST). Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research.Google Scholar
  51. Lipsey, M. W., Chapman, G. L., & Landenberger, N. A. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. The Annals of the American Academy, 578, 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, S. J. (2007). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Oslo: The Campbell Collaboration.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Little, G. L. (2005). Meta-analysis of Moral Reconation Therapy: Recidivism results from probation and parole implementations. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 14(1/2), 14–16.Google Scholar
  54. Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1988). Moral Reconation Therapy: A systematic step-by-step treatment system for treatment resistant clients. Psychological Reports, 62(1), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lopoo, L. M., & Western, B. (2005). Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lowenkamp, C. T., Hubbard, D., Makarios, M. D., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). A quasi-experimental evaluation of Thinking for a Change: A “real world” application. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(2), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lowes, R. (2001). Telemedicine. Medical Economics, 78, 24.Google Scholar
  58. Luzzo, D. A., & Day, M. A. (1999). Effects of Strong Interest Inventory feedback on career decision-making self-efficacy and social cognitive career beliefs. Journal of Career Assessment, 7(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Magaletta, P. R., Fagan, T. J., & Peyrot, M. F. (2000). Telehealth in the federal bureau of prisons: Inmates’ perceptions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 497–502.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.31.5.497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mandracchia, J. T. (2017). Measure of Criminogenic Thinking Styles (MOCTS) manual. Unpublished manual and user guide.Google Scholar
  61. McGuire, J., Bilby, C. A. L., Hatcher, R. M., Hollin, C. R., Hounsome, J., & Palmer, E. J. (2008). Evaluation of structured cognitive-behavioral treatment programmes in reducing criminal recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McMay, D., & Cotronea, M. (2015). Developing a leisure time management program to aid successful transition to community: A program template with recommendations for practitioners. The Prison Journal, 95(2), 264–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morgan, R. D., Flora, D. B., Kroner, D. G., Mills, J. F., Varghese, F., & Steffan, J. S. (2012). Treating offenders with mental illness: A research synthesis. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1), 37–50.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093964CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Morgan, R. D., Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2018). A treatment manual for justice involved persons with mental illness: Changing lives and changing outcomes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. National Institute of Justice. (1999, March). Telemedicine can reduce correctional health care costs: An evaluation of a prison telemedicine network. Retrieved February 10, 2011 from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/175040.pdf
  66. Nesmith, A., & Ruhland, E. (2008). Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and resiliency, in their own words. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(10), 1119–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nicholls, T. L., Butler, A., Kendrick-Koch, L., Brink, J., Jones, R., & Simpson, A. I. F. (2018). Assessing and treating offenders with mental illness. In M. W. Patry, M. Ternes, & P. Magaletta (Eds.), The practice of correctional psychology. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Norcross, J. C., Pfund, R. A., & Prochaska, J. O. (2013). Psychotherapy in 2022: A Delphi poll on its future. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44(5), 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parker, A., Meek, R., & Lewis, G. (2014). Sport in a youth prison: Male young offenders’ experiences of a sporting intervention. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., … Gowing, M. K. (2001). Understanding work using the Occupational Information Network (O* NET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 451–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peterson, J., Skeem, J. L., Hart, E., Vidal, S., & Keith, F. (2010). Analyzing offense patterns as a function of mental illness to test the criminalization hypothesis. Psychiatric Services, 61(12), 1217–1222.  https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2010.61.12.1217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative. (2015). Legislating evidence-based policymaking: A look at state laws that support data-driven decision-making. Issue Brief. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2015/03/legislationresultsfirstbriefmarch2015.pdf
  73. Prins, S. J. (2014). Prevalence of mental illnesses in U.S. state prisons: A systematic review. Psychiatric Services, 65(7), 862–872.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Romani, C. J., Morgan, R. D., Gross, N. R., & McDonald, B. R. (2012). Treating criminal behavior: Is the bang worth the buck? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(1), 14165. http://dx.doi.org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1037/a0024714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross, R. R., Fabiano, E. A., & Diemer-Ewles, C. (1988). Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schlossman, S., & Spillane, J. (1995). Bright hopes, dim realities: Vocational innovation in American correctional education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
  77. Shamblen, S. R., Arnold, B. B., McKiernan, P., Collins, D. A., & Strader, T. N. (2013). Applying the Creating Lasting Family Connections Marriage Enhancement Program to marriages affected by prison reentry. Family Process, 52(3), 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Skeem, J. L., Steadman, H. J., & Manchak, S. M. (2015). Applicability of the risk-need responsivity model to persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Psychiatric Services, 66(9), 916–922.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Steurer, S., Smith, L., & Tracy, A. (2001). OCE/OCA Three state recidivism study. Lanham, MD: Correctional Education Association.Google Scholar
  80. Stevenson, D. R. (1992). Rehabilitation effects of earning a general education development (GED) while in total jail confinement as measured by recidivism activity. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  81. Stewart, L. A., Gabora, N., Kropp, P. R., & Lee, Z. (2014). Effectiveness of risk-needs responsivity-based family violence programs with male offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 29(2), 151–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9575-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ternes, M., Goodwin, S., & Hyland, K. (2018). Substance use disorders in correctional population. In M. W. Patry, M. Ternes, & P. Magaletta (Eds.), The practice of correctional psychology (pp. 39–60). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Timko, C., Midboe, A. M., Maisel, N. C., Blodgett, J. C., Asch, S. M., Rosenthal, J., & Blonigen, D. M. (2014). Treatments for recidivism risk among justice-involved veterans. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(8), 620–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tong, L. S. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). How effective is the “Reasoning and Rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 12(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Torrey, E. F., Kennard, A. D., Eslinger, D., Lamb, R., & Pavle, J. (2010). More mentally ill persons are in jails and prisons than hospitals: A survey of the states. Arlington, VA: Treatment Advocacy Center. Retrieved from http://tulare.networkofcare.org/library/final_jails_v_hospitals_study1.pdf
  86. Vacca, J. S. (2004). Educated prisoners are less likely to return to prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 55(4), 297–305.Google Scholar
  87. Varghese, F. P. (2012). Vocational interventions with offenders. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(7), 1011–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012462369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Walters, G. D. (2013). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) professional manual. Allentown, PA: Center for Lifestyle Studies.Google Scholar
  89. Wilson, P. R. (1994). Recidivism and vocational education. Journal of Correctional Education, 45(4), 158–163.Google Scholar
  90. Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, L. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(2), 172–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilson, D. B., Gallager, C. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adults offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(4), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson, K., Gonzalez, P., Romero, T., Henry, K., & Cerbana, C. (2010). The effectiveness of parent education for incarcerated parents: An evaluation of Parenting from Prison. Journal of Correctional Education, 61(2), 114–132.Google Scholar
  93. Wolff, N., Morgan, R. D., Shi, J., Fisher, W., & Huening, J. (2011). Comparative analysis of thinking styles and emotional states of male and female inmates with and without mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 62, 1485–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woods, D., Breslin, G., & Hassan, D. (2017). A systematic review of the impact of sport-based interventions on the psychological well-being of people in prison. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 12, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. E. (1976). The criminal personality: Volume I: A profile for change (1st ed.). New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley B. Batastini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joshua B. Hill
    • 2
  • Alexandra Repke
    • 1
  • Laura M. Gulledge
    • 2
  • Zoe K. Livengood
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations