Legal and Financial Aspects of Eco-efficiency Investments in Poland

  • Tomasz SłońskiEmail author
  • Magdalena Ligus
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


Implementing CSR is multi-faceted and triggers a multi-dimensional decision. Researchers often group those different dimensions into three main pillars: environmental, social and corporate governance (so-called ESG factors). In previous findings of Daszyńska-Żygadło et al. (Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 27:230–238, 2016) a special attention was focused on an environmental performance and its impact on firm’s value. The aim of this chapter is to analyze the impact of Polish government regulations on the future development of renewable energy sector. We used the methodology of Regulation Impact Assessment Guidelines introduced by the EU Commission (Impact Assessment Guidelines SEC 791. Brussels, 2005) to analyze the consequences not only for sector participants but indirectly for economy and society as a whole. Since renewable energy has direct positive impact on the environment it limits the cost to the society; and since many companies report the renewable energy purchase/production as a part of their CSR policy it has indirect impact on other sectors in terms of their CSR actions. The main group of risk factors discussed in this chapter are related to the revenue stream. As a result of our analysis we suppose energy prices might increase in the auctioning system (adjusted to the reference prices), and this risk might grow over time. The other group of risk factors impacts the sales volume. Here the risks are tied to the auction mechanism. The auction characteristic (technological preferences, production volume, announcement date etc.) is in the hand of government bodies and plan for auctions in subsequent years is not scheduled. Furthermore, to fix the sales volume the investor needs to win an auction and carry operational risks.


  1. ALTRAN, Arthur D. Little. (2011). Risk quantification and risk management in renewable energy projects. International Energy Agency – Renewable Energy Technology Deployment. Retrieved from
  2. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CFA Institute. (2017). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) survey. Retrieved from
  4. Criscuolo, C., & Menon, C. (2015). Environmental policies and risk finance in the green sector: Cross-country evidence. Energy Policy, 83, 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daszyńska-Żygadło, K., & Ligus, M. (2017). Impact of risk factors on market value of companies from Polish renewable energy sector in changing regulatory environment. In S. Kapunek, & V. Krutilova (Eds.), 20th Annual International Conference “Enterprise and Competitive Environment”, Conference proceedings (pp. 195–205). Brno. Available via DIALOG. Retrieved from
  6. Daszyńska-Żygadło, K., Słoński, T., & Zawadzki, B. (2016). The market value of CSR performance across sectors. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 27(2), 230–238.Google Scholar
  7. Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., et al. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EIU. (2011). Managing the risk in renewable energy. The Economist Intelligent Unit. Available via DIALOG. Retrieved from
  9. European Commission. (2001). Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2005). Impact Assessment Guidelines SEC 791, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. Financial Times Lexicon. Retrieved from
  12. Fraunhofer ISI. (2016). The impact of risks in renewable energy investments and the role of smart policies. Final report WP3, DIACORE.Google Scholar
  13. IRE President. (2016). Energy auctions will support co-firing of biomass with coal. This can lead to loss of energy independence (interview). Available via DIALOG. Retrieved from,p945083350
  14. Kasiewicz, S., & Rogowski, W. (2009). Hybrid investments – Towards new assessment of effectiveness [in Polish]. Warsaw: WSE.Google Scholar
  15. Kayser, D. (2016). Solar photovoltaic projects in China: High investment risks and the need for institutional response. Applied Energy, 174, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loper, T., & Crittenden, V. L. (2017). Energy security: Shaping the consumer decision making process in emerging economies. Organization and Markets in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 8–32.Google Scholar
  17. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: Theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. OECD. (2011). Guidelines for multinational corporation. Retrieved from
  19. Padgett, R. C., & Galan, J. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 407–418., Available via DIALOG. Scholar
  20. Semenova, N., & Hassel, L. (2008). Industry risk moderates the relation between environmental and financial performance. Sustainable Investment Research Platform (Working Papers 08–02). Available via DIALOG. Retrieved from 2008-02%20Semenova%20and%20Hassel.pdf
  21. Terlecka, K., & Leśniak, K. (2016, July 4). Act on windfarms and amendments to the act on renewable energy sources. Mondaq Business Briefing.Google Scholar
  22. The Ministry of Economy. (2006, October). Guidelines to Regulatory Impact Assassment [in Polish] Warsaw.Google Scholar
  23. The Ministry of Finance. (2003). Administration barriers – The analysis of the problem [in Polish], Haga.Google Scholar
  24. Wiśniewski, G. (2016). Unclear role of co-firing biomass with coal. Clean Energy, 12(185), 22–28.Google Scholar
  25. Wood, I., & Broom, R. (2016, August 26). Reforming Poland’s renewable industry, renewable energy focus. Retrieved from

Legal Acts

  1. Ordinance of the Minister of Economy of 18 October 2012 regarding detailed obligations to obtain and redeem certificates of origin, substitution fee payment, purchase of electricity and heat 2012, it. 1229.Google Scholar
  2. Ordinance of the Minister of Energy of 11 August 2017 on the change in the volume of the share of the total amount of electricity resulting from the redeemed certificates of origin confirming the generation of electricity from renewable energy sources in 2018-2019. Gov. Journal of 2017, it. 1559.Google Scholar
  3. Ordinance of the Minister of Energy of 16 March 2017 on the reference price of electricity from renewable energy sources in 2017 and the periods of obligatory generators who won the auctions in 2017. Gov. Journal of 2017, it. 634.Google Scholar
  4. Ordinance of the Minister of Energy of 17 October 2016 on the change in the volume of the share of the total amount of electricity resulting from the redeemed certificates of origin confirming the generation of electricity from renewable energy sources in 2017. Gov. Journal of 2016, it. 1753.Google Scholar
  5. The Act of 10 April 1997 on energy law. Gov. Journal of 2006 no. 89 it. 625 and no. 104 it. 708.Google Scholar
  6. The Act of 20 February 2015 on renewable energy sources. Gov. Journal of 2015 it. 478.Google Scholar
  7. The Act of 20 July 2017 amending the Act on renewable energy sources. Gov. Journal of 2017, it. 1593.Google Scholar
  8. The Act of 20 May 2016 on investments in wind power plants. Gov. Journal of 2016, it. 961.Google Scholar
  9. The Act of 22 June 2016 amending the Act on renewable energy sources and certain other acts. Gov. Journal of 2016, it. 925.Google Scholar
  10. The Act of 29 December 2015 amending the Act on renewable energy sources and the Act on energy law. Gov. Journal of 2015, it. 2365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Katedra Finansów Przedsiębiorstw i Finansów Publicznych (KFP)Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we WrocławiuWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations