Advertisement

The Influence of MNEs on CSR in Poland

  • Bożena Dancewicz
  • Franziska Struve
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

The historical and economic development of Poland had an immense influence on its civic awareness which therefore differs compared to other countries. Due to its late connection to global markets and trade, the influence of MNEs in terms of regulations and responsible business practices is relatively high. The characteristics of MNEs lead to governance gaps regarding their local e.g. polish branches. Based on their assumed power, MNEs get criticized because of their possible negative impact on the society. Therefor this article examines factors which foster MNEs towards a CSR oriented behaviour.

The evolution of CSR in Poland is shown based on the example of the food retail industry. It shows similarities between the development stages of a country and the stages of CSR of local branches of MNEs from immoral management to societal marketing. Further the current status of CSR in MNEs in Poland gets observed. Comparing the concepts of CSR and societal marketing some external influence factors for MNEs will be defined besides the well-known stakeholder approach. As a special stakeholder NGOs and their role as a watchdog in Poland will be shown, as well as the change of their self-perception and especially the role of the RBF.

References

  1. Batko-Tołuć, K., & Izdebski, K. (2012). Organizacje strażnicze w Polsce. Stan obecny, wyzwania, perpektywy. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.Google Scholar
  2. Damali, J. (2008). A stakeholer approach to corporate social responsibility. A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dancewicz, B. (2012). Ethics and social responsibility across cultures (chapter 7). In M. Rozkwitalska (Ed.), Intercultural management issues. Warszawa: Difin.Google Scholar
  4. Dancewicz, B. (2016). Zachowania etyczne w przedsiębiorstwach międzynarodowych a społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu. Łódź: SAN.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, K. (1977). Business horizon 1975 – Five propositions for social responsibility. In A. B. Carroll (Ed.), Managing corporate social responsibility. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  6. Domagała-Korona, B., & Herman, A. (Eds.). (2006). Współczesne źródła wartości przedsiębiorstwa. Warszawa: Difin.Google Scholar
  7. Dyduch, J., & Krasodomska, J. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An empirical study of polish listed companies. Sustainability, 9, 1934.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. (2010). Stockholders and stakeholders. A new perspective on corporate governance. In B. De Wit & R. Meyer (Eds.), Strategy, process, content, context. London: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  9. Gallup Inc. (2016). Global engagement report. Washington. Accessed June 25, 2018, from http://www.shqiperiajone.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2016%20Global%20Civic%20Engagement%20Report.pdf
  10. Global Finance Magazine. (2017). The world’s richest and poorest countries. Data collected from international monetary fund, world economic outlook database. Accessed June 25, 2018, from https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/economic-data/worlds-richest-and-poorest-countries
  11. Hąbek, P. (2017). CSR reporting practices in Visegrad group countries and the quality of disclosure. Sustainability, 9, 2322.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jędraszewski, M. (1984) Emmanuela Lévinasa filozofia Drugiego, Przegląd Powszechny, nr 12, s. 370.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, I. W., Nyland, C. M., & Pollitt, M. G. (2004). Multinationals in developing communities: How EU multinationals build social capital in Poland. WP 285 March 2004, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (1996). Principles of marketing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Krzysztofek, A. (2015). Rozważania o pojęciu odpowiedzialności. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. ISSN 1899–3192 nr 401.Google Scholar
  16. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2011). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. OECD Publishing, Paris. Accessed June 25, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf
  17. Piasecki, R., & Gudowski, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility: The challenges and constraints. Comparative Economic Research, 20(4).  https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rok, B. (2012). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu. In W. Gasparski (Ed.), Biznes, etyka, odpowiedzialność. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Profesjonalne PWN.Google Scholar
  19. Roszyk-Kowalska, G. (2006). Reputacja jako kluczowa kompetencja przedsiębiorstwa. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, nr 1141.Google Scholar
  20. Ruggie, J. G. (2017). Multinationals as global institution: Power, authority and relative autonomy. In Regulation and governance. Milton, QLD: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Smigielska, G., & Oczkowska, R. (2017). Retailers’ responsibility towards consumers and key drivers of their development in Poland. Administrative Sciences, 7(3).  https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7010003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Szczepankiewicz, E. I., & Mućko, P. (2016). CSR reporting practices of polish energy and mining companies. Sustainability, 8, 126.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Szustek, A. (2008). Polski sektor społeczny. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.Google Scholar
  24. The Guardian. (2011). Poland’s steady economic progress matched by growth in social inequality. Accessed June 26, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/06/poland-economic-progress-social-inequality

Electronic References

  1. Avon. (2015). Corporate responsibility report. Accessed July 2, 2018, from http://www.avoncompany.com/corporate-responsibility/about-cr/reporting/reports/2015-avon-cr-report.pdf
  2. Avon. (2017). Form 10-K report. Accessed July 2, 2018, from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/8868/000000886818000013/a2017form10-k.htm
  3. Avon. (2018a). Avon’s history. Accessed July 2, 2018, from http://rep.avon.de/PRSuite/history.page
  4. Avon. (2018b). About Avon. Accessed July 2, 2018, from https://www.avon.de/uber-Avon/
  5. Avon Poland. (2018c). Accessed August 22, 2017, from http://www.kariera.avonpolska.pl/pl/about
  6. Avon Poland. (2018d). Code of conduct. Accessed July 2, 2018, from http://www.avoncompany.com/documents/ethics_and_compliance/Code_of_Conduct_Polish.pdf
  7. FOB. (2016). Raport „Odpowiedzialny biznes w Polsce 2016. Dobre praktyki”. Accessed July 2, 2018, from http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/publikacje/raport-2016/
  8. Forum Odpowiedzialnego Biznesu FOB. (2015). Początki FOB – grupa entuzjastów i trzy firmy. Accessed July 2, 2018, from http://odpowiedzialnybiznes.pl/aktualno%C5%9Bci/poczatki-fob-grupa-entuzjastow-i-trzy-firmy/
  9. Mars. (2018a). Quality. Accessed July 2, 2018, from http://www.mars.com/global/about-us/five-principles/quality
  10. Mars. (2018b). Kim jesteśmy. Accessed July 2, 2018, from http://www.mars.com/poland/pl/about.aspx
  11. Mars. (2018c). Principles in Action. Accessed July 2, 2018, from https://www.mars.com/global/doing-our-part/principles-in-action
  12. Polska Agencja Inwestycji i Handlu. (2016). List of major foreign investors in Poland – 2016/2017. Accessed July 2, 2018, from https://www.paih.gov.pl/files/?id_plik=30926

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bożena Dancewicz
    • 1
  • Franziska Struve
    • 2
  1. 1.Nowy Dwór MazowieckiPoland
  2. 2.German Graduate School of Management & Law (GGS)HeilbronnGermany

Personalised recommendations