Advertisement

Producer Collectives: What Are We Missing Out?

  • Sankar DattaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 26)

Abstract

It is widely recognised that small disaggregated producers need to come together and work as a collective enterprise. The performance of these organisations has been mired in a variety of constraints. This chapter argues that these collective enterprises work within some (i) Economic Conditions defining the business model; (ii) Organisational Design Conditions for efficient functioning and balancing governance; (iii) Socio-Economic Conditions and (iv) Institutional Conditions. An appropriate balance of all these conditions is necessary for these collective enterprises to function.

Emphasising the need for local entrepreneurs to take charge of these organisations, this chapter argues that leading a producer collective requires the ability to strike commercial deals rapidly and lead diverse producer groups. The chapter argues that this requires entrepreneurial ability in addition to leadership. Often in the process of ‘promoting’ FPOs, the ability of the local leader-entrepreneur is not allowed to flourish.

Keywords

Co-operative Entrepreneurship Dynamic commercial world Small and large farmers 

References

  1. Arrow, K.J., 1950: “A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare”, in: Journal of Political Economy, 58: 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attwood, D.W., 1988: “Socio-Political Preconditions for Successful Co-operatives: The Co-operative Sugar Factories of Western India”, in: Attwood; Baviskar (Ed.): Who Shares (Delhi: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Attwood, D.W.; Baviskar, B.S., 1987: “Why do some Co-operatives Work but Not Others? A Comparative Analysis of the Sugar Co-operatives in India”, in: Economic and Political Weekly, 22, 26: A-38–A-56.Google Scholar
  4. Bonnstetter, B.J., 2012: “New Research: The Skills That Make an Entrepreneur“, in: Harvard Business Review, 90, 12 (7 December 2012); at: https://hbr.org/2012/12/New-Research-The-Skills-That-Makes-an-Entrepreneur (16 April 2017).
  5. Bromley, D.W., 1989: Economic Interests and Institutions: the conceptual foundations of public policy (New York: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  6. Datta, S., 1992: “Economics of Co-operativization: A Comparative Analysis of Milk and Oilseeds”; Paper presented at the Symposium on Management of Rural Co-operatives, 7–11 December 1992, IRMA, Anand.Google Scholar
  7. Datta, S., 1994: “Management of Development Organisations” (IRMA: Anand).Google Scholar
  8. Datta, S., 1994: Doctoral Dissertation: Factors Affecting Performance of Village Level Organizations: Oilseed Growers’ Co-operatives in Madhya Pradesh’, Ballabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat: Sardar Patel University.Google Scholar
  9. Datta, S., 1997: “Factors Affecting Performance of Village Level Organisations”, in: Finance India, XI, 1: 79–81.Google Scholar
  10. Davda, A., 2016: “Workplace Doctor: Entrepreneurs can make their own rules”, in: The National Business (22 April); at: http://www.thenational.ae/business/the-life/workplace-doctor-entrepreneurs-can-make-their-own-rules (10 August 2017).
  11. Desai, S.T.; Phansalkar, S.J., 1992: “Role of Information Sharing in the Functioning of Board of Directors: Experience in co-operatives”, Paper presented at Symposium on Management of Rural Co-operatives, 7–11 December 1992 (Anand, Irma).Google Scholar
  12. Doharty, V.S.; Jodha, N.S., 1971: ‘Conditions for Group Action Among Farmers’, Occasional Paper 19 (Hyderabad: ICRISAT).Google Scholar
  13. Ganesh, S.R.; Joshi, P., 1985: “Institution building: Lessons from Vikrarn Sarabhai’s leadership”, in: Vikalpa, 10, 4 (1 October): 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gillinson, S., 2004: Why Cooperate? A Multi-Disciplinary Study of Collective Action (London: Overseas Development Institute, February).Google Scholar
  15. Government of India, 2012: “Evolution of Co-operatives in India” (New Delhi: Government of India); at: http://pib.nic.in/feature/fe0299/f1202992.html (25 October 2013).
  16. Gunn, C.E., 2004: Third-Sector Development: Making Up for the Market (Ithaca: ILR Press Books).Google Scholar
  17. Hansmann, H., 1987: “Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations”, in: Powel, Walter (Eds.), The Non-Profit Sector: A Research Handbook (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  18. International Cooperative Alliance, 1995: “Statement of the co-operative identity”; at: http://www.wisc.edu/uwcc/icic/issues/prin/21-cent/identity.html (5 January 2011).
  19. Menard, C. (Ed.), 2000: Institutions, Contracts and Organizations (London: E. Elger Pub.); at: http://web.missouri.edu/~cookml/CV/MENARD.PDF (17 May 2014).
  20. Misra, B., 2010: Credit Cooperatives in India: Past, Present and Future (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Myers, S.C.; Majluf, N.S., 1984: “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have that year”, in: Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 2: 187–221; at:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0 (15 April 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, R.; Krashinsky, M., 1973: “The Major Issues of Public Policy: Public Policy and Organization of Supply”, in: Nelson, Richard; Young, Dennis (Eds.): In Public Subsidy for Day Care of Young Children (Lexington, Mass: D.C. Health and Co.).Google Scholar
  23. North, D.C., 1990: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  24. Novkovic, S., 2008: “Defining the co-operative difference”, in: The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37: 2,168–2,177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olson, M., 1971: The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  26. Ostrom, E., 1991: “Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Towards Complementarity”, in: The American Political Science Review, 85, 1: 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pan African Christian AIDS Network: “Training for Community Mobilization”; at: http://teampata.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Training-for-Community-Mobilisation-for-ART-in-resource-limited-settings.pdf.
  28. Pestoff, V.A., 1992: “Third sector and co-operative services—An alternative to privatization”, in: Journal of Consumer Policy, 15, 1: 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rakesh, M., 2004: “Agricultural Credit in India: Status, Issues and Future Agenda”, in: Reserve Bank of India Bulletin (November).Google Scholar
  30. Seetharaman, S.P.; Mohanan, N., 1986: Framework for Studying Co-operative Organization: A Study of NAFED (Delhi, Oxford and IBH).Google Scholar
  31. Seibel, H.D., 2013: “Financial Cooperatives—What Role for Government? The rise and fall of the credit cooperative system in India”, in: Oluyombo, Onafowokan O. (Ed.), Cooperative and Microfinance Revolution (Lagos: Soma Prints Ltd.): 93–105.Google Scholar
  32. Sen, A., 1986 “Foundations of Social Choice Theory: An Epilogue”, in: Elster, Jon; Hylland, Aanund (eds.), Foundations of Social Choice Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 213–248.Google Scholar
  33. Shah, T., 1995: Making Farmers’ Co-Operatives Work: Design, Governance and Management (New Delhi-Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage).Google Scholar
  34. Sternberg, R.J., 2003: “Successful intelligence as a basis for entrepreneurship” (New Haven, CT: Yale University, Center for the Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise); at:  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(03)00006-5 (2 April 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wasserman, N., 2008: “The Founder’s Dilemma”, in: Harvard Business Review, (February); at: https://hbr.org/2008/02/the-founders-dilemma.
  36. Williamson, O.E., 1975: Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  37. Zuidervaart, L., n.d.: “Short Circuits and Market Failure: Theories of the Civic Sector”; at: https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Chapters/Soci/SociZuid.htm (15 May 2015).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Livelihood InitiativesAzim Premji UniversityBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations