‘Good Anthropocene’: The Zeitgeist of the 21st Century

  • Anup DashEmail author
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 26)


As we enter into the Anthropocene, the debate around sustainable community systems assume great significance as a response to the current economic, political, cultural and ecological crises. The Anthropocene isn’t just a new geological epoch; it is a crisis of the EARTH SYSTEM with ‘human agency’ at the centre. Hence, it is a very provocative concept. It challenges us to build a ‘New Global Ethos’ for the ‘Good Anthropocene’ – to bend curves in directions that are good for people and the planet, navigating the threats through a new moral practice and changing the course for the future using our unlimited creativity. But this, as the present chapter argues, involves a much deeper philosophical exercise to question, destabilise, and de-centre the ‘human’ in an anthroposised planet, and to work on theoretical innovations based on alternative ontological foundations (against the hegemonic order of ‘the universal rationalist paradigm’) for an era of post-human evolution. As a system of thought, Anthropocene erodes the very philosophical foundation of ‘Modern’ and ‘modernity’, and inspires the social sciences to build upon new ‘forms of cognition’ for a paradigm shift. This chapter argues that such a paradigm shift is already taking place in the Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE) landscape, with a compulsive pressure on us to rethink the ‘anthropos’, rejecting the notion of the homo economicus as the core ontological assumption and creating opportunities for sustainable futures through a new communitarian revolution sprouting up from epistemic ruptures in anthropocentrism, atomism, positivism and the Cartesian dualisms.


Good Anthropocene Capitalocene Ontological shift Homo economicus Social and solidarity economy (SSE) Sustainability 


  1. Aspers, P., 2011: Markets (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. et al., 1994: Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  3. Biermann, F., 2014: “The Anthropocene: A governance perspective”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 1: 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P., 1997: “Le champ economique”, in: Actes de la recherche´ en sciences socials, 119: 48–66.Google Scholar
  5. Coase, R., 1999: “Interview with Ronald Coase”, in: Newsletter of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, 2: 3–10.Google Scholar
  6. Colander, D. et al., 2009: “Financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics” Working Paper 1489, Kiel, Kiel Institute of the World Economy.Google Scholar
  7. Coyle, D., 2007: The Soulful Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Crouch, C., 2012: “Sustainability, neoliberalism, and the moral quality of capitalism”, in: Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 31: 63–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crutzen, P.J., 2002: “Geology of mankind: the Anthropocene”, in: Nature, 415: 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crutzen, P.J.; Schwägerl, C., 2011: “Living in the Anthropocene: Toward a New Global Ethos”, in: Yale Environment 360, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 24 January; at: (3 January 2019).
  11. Crutzen, P.J.; Stroermer, E.F., 2000: “The Anthropocene”, in: IGBP Newsletter, 41(12): 17–18.Google Scholar
  12. Dash, A., 2013: “Building smart cooperatives for the 21st century”, in: Roelants, Bruno (Ed.), Cooperative Growth for the 21st Century (Brussels: CICOPA/International Cooperative Alliance).Google Scholar
  13. Dash, A., 2016: “An epistemological reflection on social and solidarity economy”, in: Forum for Social Economics, 45(1): 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Lima Costa, C. et al., 2017: “On the Posthuman”, in: Ilha do Desterro, 70(2): 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobson, A., 1990: Green Political Thought: An Introduction (London: Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
  16. England, P., 1993: “The separative self: Androcentric bias in neoclassical assumptions”, in: Ferber, Marianne A.; Nelson, Julie A. (Eds.), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics (Chicago: Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, A., 2009: “The economists of tomorrow”, MPRA Paper No. 15691 (Munich Personal RePEc Archive); at: (16 November 2016).
  18. Friedman, M., 1999: “Conversation with Milton Friedman”, in: Snowden, B.; Vane, H. (Eds.), Conversations with Leading Economists: Interpreting Modern Macroeconomics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  19. Fullbrook, E., (Ed.), 2003: The Crisis in Economics: The Post-autistic Economics Movement–The First 600 Days (London/New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  20. Gandhi, M.K., 1909: Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule (Ahmedabad: Navajivan).Google Scholar
  21. Gintis, H., 2000: “Beyond homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics”, in: Ecological Economics, 5: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Granovetter, M., 1985: “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”, in: American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haraway, D., 2014: “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene: Staying with the Trouble”, Keynote given at the conference on Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. et al., 2016: “Anthropologists Are Talking – About The Anthropocene”, in: Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 81, 3: 535–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirschman, A.O., 1986: Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  26. Homans, G., 1990: “The Rational Choice Theory and Behavioural Psychology”, in: Calhoun, C.; Meyer, M.W.; Scott, W.R. (Eds.), Structures of Power and Constraint. Papers in Honour of Peter M. Blau (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  27. Horton, T.J., 2011: “The coming extinction of homo economicus and the eclipse of the Chicago school of antitrust: Applying evolutionary biology to structural and behavioural antitrust analysis”, in: Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 42: 469–522.Google Scholar
  28. Kant, I., 1963: On History (New York: Bobbs-Merrill).Google Scholar
  29. Kant, I., 1990: Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  30. Latour, B., 2014: “Anthropology at the Time of the Anthropocene. A Personal View of What Is to Be Studied”. Distinguished lecture at the American Anthropologists Association meeting in Washington, December 2014; at: (18 October 2016).
  31. Leff, E., 2009: “Degrowth, or deconstruction of the economy: Towards a sustainable world”, Occasional Paper Series No. 6, in: Contours of Climate Justice, Critical Currents (Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation).Google Scholar
  32. Mäki, U., 2005: “Economic epistemology: Hopes and horrors”, in: Episteme, 1: 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malm, A.; Hornborg, A., 2014: “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 1: 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthaei, J., “Solidarity Economy” page of the Transformation Center web page ; at: (9 November 2016).
  35. Mill, J.S., 2004: “Essay V: On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It”, in: Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy (Pennsylvania State University, Electronic Classic Series): 93–125.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, E., 2009: “Solidarity economy: Key concepts and issues”, in: Kawano, E. et al. (Eds.), Solidarity Economy 1: Building alternatives for people and planet (Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics).Google Scholar
  37. Moore, J.W., 2014a: “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of Our Ecological Crisis” (unpublished), Binghamton University, Fernand Braudel Center.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, J.W., 2014b: “The Capitalocene, Part II: Abstract Social Nature and the Limits to Capital” (unpublished), Binghamton University, Fernand Braudel Center.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, J.W., 2015: Capitalism in the Web of Life: ECOLOGY AND THE ACCUMULATION OF CAPITAL (New York: Verso).Google Scholar
  40. Razeto, L., 1998: “El ‘Factor C’: La Fuerza de la Solidaridad en la Economia. [‘Factor C’: The force of solidarity in the economy’]; at: (December 2016).
  41. Rees, M., 2016: “The Anthropocene epoch could inaugurate even more marvellous eras of evolution”, in: The Guardian, 29 August.Google Scholar
  42. Rockström, J. et al., 2009: “Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity”, in: Ecology and Society [online], 42(2): 32; at: (14 January 2016).
  43. Schumpeter, J.A., 1991: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, Swedberg, Richard (Ed.), (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  44. Sen, A., 1987: On Ethics and Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  45. Seielstad, G.A., 2012: Dawn of the Anthropocene: Humanity’s defining moment (Alexandria, VA: The American Geosciences Institute).Google Scholar
  46. Smith, A., 1759/1790: Theory of Moral Sentiments (London: A. Miller).Google Scholar
  47. Steffen, W. et al., 2004: Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure (The IGBP Book Series, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag).Google Scholar
  48. Steffen, W. et al., 2011: “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives”, in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369: 842–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steffen, W. et al., 2015: “The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 2: 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steffen, W.; Crutzen, P.J.; McNeill Jr., 2007: “The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature?” in: Ambio, 36: 614–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taylor, M., 1988: “Rationality and revolutionary collective action”, in: Taylor, Michael (Ed.), Rationality and Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  52. Thaler, R.H., 2000: “From homo economicus to homo sapiens”, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Volkmann, K., 2012: “Solidarity economy between a focus on the local and a global view”, in: International Journal of Community Currency Research, 16: D-97-105. Theory and Practice (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utkal UniversityBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations