Advertisement

Understanding Livelihood Diversification: A Case Study of Mushroom Farming in Bihar

  • Surya BhushanEmail author
  • Piyush Kumar Singh
  • Sridhar Telidevara
  • Santosh Kumar
Chapter
Part of the The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science book series (APESS, volume 26)

Abstract

Mushroom cultivation has been identified as an important livelihood strategy that fits in very well with sustainable farming. This has several advantages, for example, it uses agricultural waste products, it works like a quick cash crop with no use of land, a high production per surface area can be obtained, and after picking, the spent substrate is still a good soil conditioner. The study also delineates the production economics of mushroom cultivation among the poorest of the poor.

A study was also conducted in three villages of Nalanda district in the state of Bihar to identify the determinants and constraints to livelihood diversification. The study has shown that educational level, asset position, access to credit, and rural infrastructure are some important driving forces towards livelihood diversification in the region. The resource-poor are particularly vulnerable and unable to diversify because of the entry barriers imposed by their weak asset base.

Keywords

Sustainable livelihood farming Livelihood diversification Mushroom cultivation 

References

  1. Ackerly, B.A., 1995: “Testing the tools of development: credit programmes, loan involvement and women’s empowerment”, in: IDS Bulletin, 26(3): 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, B.A.de; Morduch, J., 2005: The Economics of Microfinance (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
  3. DFID, 1999: Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets (London: Department for International Development).Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, F.; Biggs, S., 2001: “Evolving themes in rural development 1950s–2000s”, in: Development Policy Review, 19(4): 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, F., 1998: “Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification”, in: The Journal of Development Studies, 35(1): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO; World Bank, 2001: Farming Systems and Poverty—Improving Farmer’s Livelihoods in a Changing World (Rome: Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
  7. Garikipati, S., 2008: “The impact of lending to women on household vulnerability and women’s empowerment: Evidence from India”, in: World Development, 36(12): 2,620–2,642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hussein, K.; Nelson, J., 1998: Sustainable Livelihoods and Livelihood Diversification, IDS Working Paper 69 (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies).Google Scholar
  9. Marshall, Elaine; N.G. (Tan) Nair, 2009: Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division, (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations).Google Scholar
  10. Nair, T.S., 2005: “The transforming world of Indian microfinance”, in: Economic and Political Weekly, 23 April: 1,695–1,698.Google Scholar
  11. Sander, T., 2015: “About Social Capital”, Saguaro Seminar: Civic Engagement in America, John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.Google Scholar
  12. Shiyani, R.L.; Pandya, H.R., 1998: “Diversification of agriculture in Gujarat: A spatio-temporal analysis”, in: Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53: 627–639.Google Scholar
  13. UN, 2009: Woman’s Control over Economic Resources and Access to Financial Resources, Including Microfinance (Washington DC: World Survey on the Role of Women in Development).Google Scholar
  14. Wooldridge, J., 2016: Introductory Econometrics (Boston: Cengage Learning).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Surya Bhushan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Piyush Kumar Singh
    • 2
  • Sridhar Telidevara
    • 3
  • Santosh Kumar
    • 4
  1. 1.Development Management Institute (DMI)PatnaIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)KharagpurIndia
  3. 3.Great Lakes Institute of ManagementGurgaonIndia
  4. 4.Bihar Rural Livelihoods Programme Society (BRLPS)NalandaIndia

Personalised recommendations