• Dilek Karal


In this chapter the author summarizes and discusses the major findings and arguments of the study. Combining a set of diverse theoretical and methodological perspectives, the author points out how ethico-political forms of global governmentality are constructed through global policy propositions for Africa in general, and for Ethiopia in particular. This part identifies problematizations of Africa, Ethiopia and migrants in international policy propositions on immigration and asylum. The chapter discusses global governmentality of migration as a systemic regime that has visible, technical aspects as well as identity formative characteristics. The chapter argues that ethico-political governmentality tailor certain identities for region, host country and refugees at differing levels. A responsibilizing approach issues migrants’ problems as issues of morale rather than social problems. This part of the book maintains that ethico-political propositions on Africa, Ethiopia and migrants create double effect and ethnocentric solutions for refugees’ longitudinal problems. The chapter concludes by introducing the book’s prospects for future discussions.


  1. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Diress, A. (2011). The Right to Asylum: A Case Study with Particular Reference to Somali and Eritrean Asylum-Seekers and Refugees in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2009). 1st Annual Report on Immigration and Asylum. Brussels: EU COMM.Google Scholar
  4. Human Rights Watch. (2002). Hidden in Plain View: Refugees Living Without Protection in Nairobi and Kampala. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  5. Inda, J. X. (2006). Border Prophylaxis: Technology, Illegality, and the Government of Immigration. Cultural Dynamics, 18(2), 115–138. Scholar
  6. IOM. (2000). World Migration Report. Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
  7. IOM. (2005). World Migration Report. Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
  8. O’Malley, P. (1996). Risk and Responsibility. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Rationalities of Government (pp. 189–207). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Rose, N. (2006). The Politics of Life Itself Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dilek Karal
    • 1
  1. 1.Bir Dünya Çocuk DerneğiGaziantepTurkey

Personalised recommendations