Advertisement

Reuse and Reengineering of Non-ontological Resources in the Legal Domain

  • Cristiana SantosEmail author
  • Pompeu Casanovas
  • Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
  • Leendert van der Torre
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10791)

Abstract

Instead of custom-building a new ontology from scratch, knowledge resources can be elicited, reused and engineered to develop legal ontologies with the goal of promoting the application of good practices and speeding up the ontology development process. This paper focuses on the specificities of non-ontological resources in the legal domain, and provides some guidelines of how these can be reused and engineered to enable heterogeneous resources integration within a legal ontology. The paper presents some examples of these processes using a case-study in the consumer law domain.

Keywords

Ontology engineering Non-ontological resources Legal ontology MeLOn methodology NeOn methodology 

References

  1. 1.
    Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.): Ontology Engineering in a Networked World. Springer, Dordrecht (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breuker, J., Valente, A., Winkels, R.: Use and reuse of legal ontologies in knowledge engineering and information management. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 36–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gangemi, A., Sagri, M.-T., Tiscornia, D.: A constructive framework for legal ontologies. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 97–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Francesconi, E.: Semantic model for legal resources: Annotation and reasoning over normative provisions. Semant. Web Leg. Domain Semant. Web 7(3), 255–265 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casanovas, P.: Semantic web regulatory models. Philos. Technol. 28(1), 33–55 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mockus, M., Palmirani, M.: Legal ontology for open government data mashups, pp. 113–124 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2017.25
  7. 7.
    van Opijnen, M., Santos, C.: On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval. Artif. Intell. Law 2017(25), 65–87 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Villazón-Terrazas, B., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A.: A pattern-based method for re-engineering nonontological resources into ontologies. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 6(4), 27–63 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Villazon-Terrazas, B.M.: Method for reusing and re-engineering non-ontological resources for building ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, UPC (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suárez-Figueroa, M.-C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M.: The NeOn methodology framework: a scenario-based methodology for ontology development. Appl. Ontol. 10, 107–145 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santos, C., Rodriguez-Doncel, V., Casanovas, P., van der Torre, L.: Modeling relevant legal information for consumer disputes. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9831, pp. 150–165. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44159-7_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gianmaria, A., Boella, G., et al.: European legal taxonomy syllabus: a multi-lingual, multi-level ontology framework to untangle the web of European legal terminology. Appl. Ontol. 11(4), 325–375 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Hert, P., Papakonstantinou, V.: The proposed data protection regulation replacing directive 95/46/EC: a sound system for the protection of individuals. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 28(2), 130–142 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hunter, D., Thomas, J.: Lego and the system of intellectual property, 1955–2015, 7 March 2016. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2743140
  15. 15.
    Rahman, M.: Legal ontology for nexus: water, energy and food in EU regulations. Dissertation thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna. Dottorato di ricerca in Law, science and technology, 28 Ciclo (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santos, C.: Ontologies for legal relevance and consumer complaints. A case study in the air transport passenger domain. Dissertation thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna. Dottorato di ricerca in Law, science and technology, 29 Ciclo (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Opijnen, M.: A model for automated rating of case law. In: 2013 ICAIL, NY, pp. 140–149 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramakrishna, S., Górski, Ł., Paschke, A.: A dialogue between a lawyer and computer scientist: the evaluation of knowledge transformation from legal text to computer-readable format. Appl. Artif. Intell. 30(3), 216–232 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Casanovas, P., Casellas, N., Tempich, C., Vrandečić, D., Benjamins, R.: OPJK and DILIGENT: ontology modeling in a distributed environment. Artif. Intell. Law 15(2), 171–186 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGuinness, D.: Ontologies come of age. In: Fensel, D., Hendler, J., Lieberman, H., Wahlster, W. (eds.) Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gahegan, M., Luo, J., et al.: Comput. Geosci. 35, 836–854 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D.: Integrating a bottom–up and top–down methodology for building semantic resources for the multilingual legal domain. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 95–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Athan, T., et al.: OASIS LegalRuleML. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barabucci, G., Cervone, L., Di Iorio, A., Palmirani, M., Peroni, S., Vitali, F.: Managing semantics in XML vocabularies: an experience in the legal and legislative domain. In: 2009 Proceedings of Balisage (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristiana Santos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pompeu Casanovas
    • 1
    • 4
  • Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
    • 2
  • Leendert van der Torre
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Law and Technology (IDT-UAB)BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Ontology Engineering GroupUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.University of LuxembourgLuxembourg CityLuxembourg
  4. 4.Data to Decisions Cooperative Research Centre, La Trobe Law SchoolMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations